Studies on Operational Frequencies of Controls on Self-propelled Combine Harvesters in India

Authors

  • Prabhakar Shukla Author
  • C. R. Mehta Author
  • K. N. Agrawal Author
  • R. R. Potdar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2021581.1738

Keywords:

Combine harvester, controls, operational frequency, operator, reach zone

Abstract

A study was conducted to measure the operational frequencies of various controls on self-propelled combine harvesters and to categorize them into frequently and infrequently operated controls. The operational frequency of controls on 10 combine harvesters of different makes and models were measured during harvesting of wheat crop. The frequency of use of frequently operated controls viz. header assembly control lever, ground speed control lever, gear shift lever, brake pedal, and clutch pedal ranged 232-484, 43-170, 41- 135, 42-140, and 66-162 action.h-1, respectively. The percent time distributions of operation of controls were 44.84, 13.40, 12.21, 13.10, and 16.42%, respectively. The controls on the combine harvesters used repetitively that require high level of human effort. Therefore, to accommodate 90% of user population, the most frequently operated controls should preferably be placed in the optimum reach zone, and infrequently used controls can be conveniently placed within maximum reach zone of operators’ reach envelope.

References

Anon. 2020. India Combine Harvester Market - Growth, Trends, COVID-19 Impact, and Forecast (2021-2026). Industry Report, Mordor Intelligence, Hyderabad, Telangana, www.mordorintelligence.com.

Anon. 2021. Grain gain: Punjab beats MP, regains top wheat producing state tag. Hindustan Times (Chandigarh edition), E-paper, 29 May, 2021. https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/chandigarh-news/grain-gain-punjab-beats-mp-regains-top-wheatproducing-state-tag-101622230045277.html.

Arude V G; Pacharne D T; Tiwari V K. 1999.Locating of controls and operators activities in Indian tractors. Agric. Mech. Asia Afr. Latin Am., 30, 19-22.

Barber T S. 1979. Tractor driver observations:(a) division of time between looking forwards and backwards, (b) frequency of turning round in the seat. National Insitute of Agricultural Engineering, Silsoe (unpubl), File note 18/79/02005.

Donati P M; Boldero A G; Whyte R T; Stayner R M. 1984. The postural support of seats: a study of driver preferences during simulated tractor operation. Appl. Ergon., 15, 2-10.

Dupuis H. 1959. Effect of tractor operation on human stress. Agric. Eng., 40, 510-519,525.

Fallahi H; Abbaspour-Fard M H; Azhari A; Khojastehpour M; Nikkhah A. 2016.Ergonomic assessment of drivers in MF285 and MF399 tractors during clutching using algometer. Inf. Process. Agric., 3(1), 54-60.

Gabriele C. 2016. Ergonomic Work Allowance (EWA) for cyclical industrial work. Antropometria e Biomeccanica (UNI/CT 015/GL06), International MTM Directorate , http://mtm-international.org.

Garg A; Saxena U. 1982. Maximum frequency acceptable to female workers for one-handed lifts in the horizontal plane. Ergon., 25(9), 839-853.

Ghaderi E; Maleki A; Dianat I. 2014. Design of combine harvester seat based on anthropometric data of Iranian operators. Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 44, 810-816.

Gite L P; Agrawal K N; Mehta C R; Potdar R R; Narwariya B S. 2020. Hand Book of Ergonomical Design of Agricultural Tools Equipment and Work Places. Jain Brothers, New Delhi, pp: 23-26.

ISO. 2016. Road Vehicles- Transport Information and Control Systems- Detection-response Task (DRT) for Assessing Attentional Effects of Cognitive Load in Driving. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, ISO 17488, pp: 4.

ISO/TS 15077. 2002. Tractors and Self-propelled Machinery for Agriculture and Forestry-operator Controls- Actuating Forces, Displacement, Location and Method of Operation. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, , pp: 8.

Kumar S. 2007. Biomechanics in Ergonomics.Second edition, CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, pp:742.

Madan V; Dhingra H S; Singh S. 2008. Ergonomic studies on the location and operational frequency of controls in Indian farm tractors. Agric. Mech. Asia Afr. Lat. Am., 39(1), 56-60.

Mehta C R; Tewari V K. 2000. Seating discomfort for tractor operators-A critical review. Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 25, 661-674.

Mehta C R; Gite L P; Pharade S C; Majumder J; Pandey M M. 2008. Review of anthropometric considerations for tractor seat design. Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 38, 546-554.

Mehta C R; Chandel N S; Senthilkumar T; Singh K K. 2014.Trends of agricultural mechanization in India. CSAM Policy Brief, 2, 1-13.

Mehta C R; Chandel N S; Jena P S; Jha A. 2019. Indian agriculture counting on farm mechanization. Agric. Mech. Asia Afr. Latin Am., 50(1), 84-89.

Modi Rajesh U; Manjunatha K; Gautam Prem Veer; Nagesh kumar T; Sanodiya R; Chaudhary V; Murthy G R K; Srinivas I; Rao Srinivasa Ch. 2020. Climate-smart Technology Based Farm Mechanization for Enhanced Input Use Efficiency. In: Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies, ICAR-National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad, Telangana, India, 325-357. ISBN No. : 978-81-943090-7-9

Patel A; Singh R; Shukla P; Moses S C. 2018. Performance evaluation of self propelled reaper binder for harvesting of wheat crop. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 7(12), 896-906. doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.712.112

Potdar R R. 2020. Gender neutral workplace design for Indian tractor. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.

Shukla P; Nandi S; Shau P; Patel A; Tripathi H. 2020. Field test analysis of straw reaper combine for optimized operating condition to improve the performance. Curr. J. Appl. Sci. Technol., 39(8), 77-86.

Shukla S; Yadav R. 2017. Compatibility analysis of control arrangement for some Indian tractors. J. Agric. Eng., 54(4), 16-27.

Victor V M; Nath S; Verma A. 2002. Anthropometric survey of Indian farm workers to approach ergonomics in agricultural machinery design. Appl. Ergon., 33, 579-581.

Yadav Rajvir. 1995. Some ergonomic investigations on tractor operator workplace design. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur (W.B.), India.

Zander J. 1972. Ergonomic in Machine Design: A Case Study of the Self Propelled Combine Harvester. H. Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen, Promotor(en) Moens A – Wageningen, Veenman, 23-29, 95.

Published

2022-11-07

Issue

Section

Regular Issue

How to Cite

Prabhakar Shukla, C. R. Mehta, K. N. Agrawal, & R. R. Potdar. (2022). Studies on Operational Frequencies of Controls on Self-propelled Combine Harvesters in India. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 58(2). https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2021581.1738