Geo-informatics based Morphometric Analysis of a Reservoir Catchment in Shivalik Foothills of North-West India

Mahesh Chand Singh; Rohit Singh; Abrar Yousuf; Vishnu Prasad

doi:10.52151/jae2021581.1752

Authors

Mahesh Chand Singh Department of Soil and Water Engineering, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004, India Author
Rohit Singh U.G. Student, Department of Soil and Water Engineering, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004, India Author
Abrar Yousuf Scientist, Department of Soil and Water Engineering, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004, India Author
Vishnu Prasad P. G. Student, Department of Soil and Water Engineering, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2021581.1752

Keywords:

Catchment, Geo-informatics, morphometric, relief, Shivalik foothills

Abstract

The present study examined 35 morphometric parameters related to stream/drainage network, catchment geometry, and relief aspects for hydrological characterization of the Thana Dam catchment using geospatial tools and techniques. The dam catchment was delineated using the high-resolution Advanced Land Observing Satellite Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (ALOS PALSAR) Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data in ArcGIS 10.4.1 software using the Arc Hydro tools. The catchment is comprised of 4th order stream, obtained using a stream threshold value of 100 m length. The lower values of elongation ratio (0.61), circularity ratio (0.22), and form factor (0.29) indicated higher soil erosion potential, mainly due to their inverse relationship with land erodibility. Moreover, the higher values of stream frequency (15.7), drainage density (>5.0), drainage texture (7.48 km-1), and mean bifurcation ratio (4.08-6.33) indicated higher runoff potential, which would intensify the soil erosion, mainly due to their direct relationship with erodibility. Bifurcation ratio, elongation ratio, circulatory ratio, form factor, altogether indicated an elongated shape of the catchment with a fine drainage texture. The higher values of bifurcation ratio and texture ratio of the catchment also indicated severe overland flow (low infiltration rate) with a limited scope for groundwater recharge in the area, which in turn might significantly encourage the soil erosion. Overall, it was concluded that the catchment has a huge runoff potential resulting in high soil erosion due to its fine texture, impermeable subsurface material, steep slope, low infiltration rate, limited vegetation, longer duration of overland flow, and higher surface runoff. The morphometric analysis was found to be suitable for identifying catchment shape and the factors affecting hydrologic conditions and erodibility of the catchment. Thus, Geo-informatics based morphometric analysis of a reservoir catchment can be useful to study the erosion potential in relation to hydrologic (rainfall-runoff relationship) and other related land characteristics (e.g., relief, slope, infiltration rate, etc.).

References

Agarwal C S. 1998. Study of drainage pattern through aerial data in Nagar area of Varanasi district. J. Indian Soc. Rem. Sens., 26, 169-175.

Ahmed S A; Chandrashekarappa K N; Raj S K; Nischitha V; Kavitha G. 2010. Evaluation of morphometric parameters derived from ASTER and SRTM DEM: A study on Bandihole sub-catchment basin in Karnataka. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens., 38, 227-238.

Arabameri A; Tiefenbacher J P; Blaschke T; Pradhan B; Tien Bui D. 2020. Morphometric analysis for soil erosion susceptibility mapping using novel GIS-based ensemble model. Remote Sens., 12(5), 874. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12050874

Bhardwaj A; Kaushal M P. 2009. Two-dimensional physically based finite element runoff model for small agricultural catchment: I. Model development. Hydrol. Process, 23, 397-407.

Chandrashekar H; Lokesh K V; Sameena M; Roopa J; Ranganna G. 2015. GIS –based morphometric analysis of two reservoir catchments of Arkavati river, Ramanagaram district, Karnataka. In: Proc. Dwarakish G S (Ed.), Int. Conf. on Water Resources, Coastal and Ocean Engineering (ICWRCOE’15), Mangalore, India Aquatic Procedia, Elsevier B. V, The Netherlands, 4, 1345-1353.

Chitra C; Alaguraja P; Ganeshkumari K; Yuvaraj D; Manivel M. 2011. Watershed characteristics of Kundah subbasin using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Int. J. Geomatics Geosci., 2(1), 311–335.

Chorley R J; Malm D E; Pogorzelski H A. 1957. A new standard for estimating drainage basin shape. Am. J. Sci., 255, 138-141.

Faniran A. 1968. The index of drainage intensity- A provisional new drainage factor. Aust. J. Sci., 31, 328- 330.

Forest Survey of India. 2019. Stat of Forest Report. Available at https://fsi.nic.in/isfr19/vol2/isfr-2019-vol-ii-punjab.pdf.

Gajbhiye S; Mishra S K; Pandey A. 2014. Prioritizing erosion-prone area through morphometric analysis: an RS and GIS perspective. Appl. Water Sci., 4, 51-56.

Gupta R; Misra A K; Sahu V. 2019. Identification of catchment preference management areas under water quality and scarcity constraints. Appl. Water Sci., 9(27), 2-22.

Horton R E. 1932. Drainage-basin characteristics. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 13(1), 350-361.

Horton R E. 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 56 (3), 275-370.

IPRI. 2008. A Report on Sedimentation Survey of Saleran Dam Reservoir in Kandi Area of Punjab. Irrigation and Power Research Institute (IPRI), Amritsar, Punjab, 1-6.

Jenson S K; Domingue J O. 1988. Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information system analysis. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 54, 1593-1600.

Kanth T A; Hassan Z. 2012. Morphometric analysis and prioritization of catchments for soil and water resource management in Wular catchment using geo-spatial tools. Int. J. Geol. Earth Environ. Sci., 2, 30-41.

Kushwaha N L; Bhardwaj A. 2017. Remote Sensing and GIS based morphometric analysis for micro-watershed prioritization in Takarla-Ballowal Watershed. J. Agric. Eng., 54 (3), 48-56.

Mangan P; Haq M A; Baral P. 2019. Morphometric analysis of watershed using remote sensing and GIS- A case study of Nanganji river basin in Tamil Nadu, India. Arabian J. Geosci., 12(6), 1-14.

McCullagh P. 1978. Modern Concepts in Geomorphology. Oxford University Press, USA, No. 6, pp: 128.

Melton M A. 1957. An Analysis of the Relations Among Elements of Climate, Surface Properties and Geomorphology. Columbia University, New York, NY, Project NR 389042, Tech. Rep. 11, pp: 102.

Melton M A. 1965. The geomorphic and paleo-climatic significance of alluvial deposits in Southern Arizona. J. Geol., 73, 1-3.

Obeidat M; Awawdeh M; Al‐Hantouli F. 2021. Morphometric analysis and prioritisation of watersheds for flood risk management in Wadi Easal basin (WEB), Jordan, using geospatial technologies. J. Flood Risk Manage., 14(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12711

O’Callaghan J F; Mark D M. 1984. The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data. Comput. Gr. Image Process., 28, 323-344.

Pareta K; Pareta U. 2011. Hydromorphogeological study of Karawan catchment using GIS and remote sensing techniques. Int. Sci. Res. J., 3, 243-268.

Patton P C. 1988. Drainage basin morphometry and floods. In: Baker V R; Kochel R C; Patton P C (Eds.) Flood Geomorphology, Wiley, New York, 51-65.

Prasad V; Yousuf A; Sharma N. 2020. GIS based morphometric analysis of a forest watershed in lower Shivaliks of Punjab using high resolution satellite data. J. Soil Water Conserv., 19 (3), 292-299.

Prasad V; Bhardwaj A. 2021. Temporal land use change analysis of Saleran dam catchment in Shivalik foot-hills of Punjab using Geospatial Techniques. J. Agric. Eng., 58(2), 167-176.

Rai P K; Mohan K; Mishra S; Ahmad A; Mishra V N. 2014. A GIS-based approach in drainage morphometric analysis of Kanhar river basin, India. Appl. Water Sci., 7(1), 217-232.

Rai P K; Mohan K; Mishra S; Ahmad A; Mishra V N. 2017. A GIS-based approach in drainage morphometric analysis of Kanhar River basin, India. Appl. Water Sci., 7, 217-232.

Rai P K; Chandel R S; Mishra V N; Singh P. 2018. Hydrological inferences through morphometric analysis of lower Kosi river basin of India for water resource management based on remote sensing data. Appl. Water Sci., 8(15), 2-16.

Reddy G P O; Patil N G; Chaturvedi A. 2017. Sustainable Management of Land Resources: An Indian Perspective. Apple Academic Press, New York, pp: 822.

Sadeghi S H R. 2020. Watershed management in the 21st Century. In: Yousuf A; Singh M (Eds.) Catchment Hydrology, Management and Modeling, Taylor and Francis, Vol. 1 (Chapter 9), 152-162.

Schumm S A. 1956. Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 67, 597-646.

Sharma D D; Thakur B R. 2016. Prioritization of micro catchments in Giri catchment for conservation and planning. Trans. Inst. Indian Geo., 38 (2), 267-280.

Singh M C. 2019. Gully erosion and its control. In: Yousuf A; Singh M (Eds.) Catchment Hydrology, Management and Modeling, Taylor and Francis, Vol. 1 (Chapter 6), 98-114.

Singh S; Bhardwaj A; Verma V K. 2016. Hydrological characterization of Dholbaha watershed in Shivalik foothills using RS and GIS. J. Agric. Eng., 53 (2), 1-11.

Smith K G. 1950. Standards for grading textures of erosional topography. Am. J. Sci., 248, 655-668.

Sreedevi P D; Owais S; Khan H H; Ahmed S. 2009. Morphometric analysis of a catchment of south India using SRTM data and GIS. J. Geol. Soc. India, 73, 543-552.

Strahler A N. 1952. Hypsometric analysis of erosional topography. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 63, 1117-1142.

Strahler A N. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans .Am. Geophys. Union, 38 (6), 913-920.

Strahler A N. 1964. Quantitative Geomorphology of Drainage Basins and Channel Networks. Handbook of Applied Hydrology. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, 4-76.

Strahler A N. 1968. Quantitative Geomorphology. In: Fairbridge R W (Ed.) The Encyclopedia of Geomorphology. Reinhold Book Corporation, New York, 439-476.

Sudheer A S. 1986. Hydrogeology of the upper Araniar river basin, Chittor district, Andhra Predesh, India. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Sri Venkateswara Univ., Tirupati.

Umrikar B N. 2017. Morphometric analysis of Andhale watershed, Taluka Mulshi, District Pune, India. Appl. Water Sci., 7, 2231–2243.

Venkatesan A. 2014. Geoinformatics in fluvial geomorphological study of Thoppaiyar sub- basin in Tamil Nadu, India. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Geology, Periyar University, Salem – 636 011, India.

Verstappen H Th. 1983. Applied Geomorphology (Geomorphological Surveys for Environmental Development). Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co., Amsterdam, New York, pp: 437.

Vijith H; Satheesh R. 2006. GIS based morphometric analysis of two major upland sub-catchments of Meenachil river in Kerala. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens., 34, 181-185.

Vittala S S; Govindaiah S; Gowda H H. 2004. Morphometric analysis of sub-watersheds in the Pavagada area of Tumkur District, South India using remote sensing and GIS technique. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens., 32 (4), 351–362.

Waikar M; Nilawar A P. 2014. Morphometric analysis of a drainage basin using Geographical Information System: A case study. Int. J. Multidis. Curr. Res., 2, 179-184.

Yousuf A; Bhardwaj A; Prasad V. 2021. Simulating impact of conservation interventions on runoff and sediment yield in a degraded watershed using WEPP model. ECOPERSIA, 9 (3), 191-205.