Determination of Crop Coefficient of Okra Crop Using Lysimeter for Semi-arid Climatic Condition of Parbhani, Maharashtra

Authors

  • H. W. Awari Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, Maharashtra Author
  • V. K. Ingle Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, MaharashtraV. K. Ingle Author
  • U. M. Khodke 3ADP, College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, Maharashtra Author
  • K. A. Balore Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, Maharashtra Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2023603.1816

Keywords:

Crop coefficient, FAO-56 Penman Monteith method, lysimeter, okra, reference evapotranspiration

Abstract

Water being a limited resource, its judicious and efficient uses for irrigation is important, especially in summer seasons to meet challenges of water scarcity. Summer okra is an important vegetable crop of India, which requires timely irrigation to achieve higher production. Information on crop coefficient (KC) of okra crop is vital for proper irrigation scheduling. A field experiment was conducted using weighing-type lysimeter at Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth (VNMKV), Parbhani, in Marathwada region (semi-arid climatic condition) of Maharashtra, India, during the summer of 2022. Crop coefficient values for okra crop ranged from 0.61 to 1.41 upto 70 days after dibbling, and then declined to 0.64. The peak value of Kc was 1.41 in the 10th week after dibbling of seeds. The mean value of Kc for initial, development, mid, and late stages were 0.64, 1.07, 1.33, and 0.86, respectively. Estimated Kc values would help in better estimation of irrigation water requirement, proper planning, and utilisation of water resources in the Marathwada region of Maharashtra state.

References

Anon. 2021. Cultivation Practices of Vegetables. Krishi Dainandini, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth (VNMKV), Parbhani, 194-195.

Anon. 2022. Agresco Report of AICRP on Irrigation Water Management, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth (VNMKV), Parbhani, 63-64.

Abedinpour M. 2015. Evaluation of growth-stage-specific crop coefficients of maize using weighing lysimeter. Soil Water Res., 10, 99-104. doi: 10.17221/63/2014-SWR

Allen G R; Pereira S L; Raes D; Smith M. 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration- Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirement. FAO Irrigation and Drainage. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, FAO Irrigation and Drainage. Paper 56, 104-106.

Amayreh J; Al-Abed N. 2005. Developing crop coeff icients for field-grown tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum Mill.) under drip irrigation with black plastic mulch. Agric. Water Manage., 73(3), 247-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.10.008

Awari H W; Khodke U M. 2018. Development of modified crop coefficients based on weather parameters of Parbhani for Kharif crops. Trends Biosci., 11(4), 495-499.

Awari H W; Khodke U M; Ingle V K; Vikhe S D. 2019. Development of modified crop coefficients based on weather parameters of Aurangabad for rabi crop. J. Agric. Res. Technol., 44(1), 029-033.

Bandyopadhyaya A; Bhadra A; Swarnakar R K; Raghuwanshi N S; Singh R. 2012. Estimation of reference evapotranspiration using a user-friendly decision support system: DSS ET. Agric. For. Meteorol., 154–155, 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.10.013

Dabhi P V; Lakkad A P; Patel R; Shrivastava P K. 2020. Application of dual crop coefficient approach for estimation of crop water requirement for summer sesame using SIMDualKc Model. J. Agric. Eng., 57 (4), 364-376. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2018551.1728

Dakhore K K; Kadam Y E; Kumar P V. 2020. Study of the rainfall variability and impact of El Nino episode on rainfall and crop productivity at Parbhani. Mausam, 71(2), 285-290. https://doi.org/10.54302/mausam.v71i2.26

Doorenbos J; Pruitt W O. 1977. Guidelines for Prediction of Crop Water Requirements. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No.24 (rev), pp:144.

Fisher D K. 2012. Simple weighing lysimeters for measuring evapotranspiration and developing crop coefficients. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 5 (3), 35-43.

George B A; Reddy B R S; Raghuwanshi N S; Wallender W W. 2002. Decision support system for estimating reference evapotranspiration. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 128 (1), 1-10.

Holsambare D G. 1988. Thibak Sinchan Tantra. Continental Prakashan, Vijay Nagar, Pune, 1-61.

Jensen M E. 1968. Water Consumption by Agricultural Plants. In: Kozlowski TT (Ed.), Plant Water Consumption and Response- Water Deficit and Plants Growth, Academic Press, New York, USA, Vol. II, 1-22.

Ko J; Piccinni G; Marek T; Howell T. 2009. Determination of growth-stage-specific crop coefficients (Kc) of cotton and wheat. Agric. Water Manage., 96(12), 1691-1697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.06.023

Liu Y; Luo Y A. 2010. Consolidated evaluation of the FAO-56 dual crop coefficient approach using the lysimeter data in the North China Plain. Agric. Water Manage., 97(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.07.003

Pandey P; Pandey V. 2011. Lysimeter based crop coefficients for estimation of crop evapotranspiration of black gram (Vigna mungo L.) in sub-humid region. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 4, 50-58.

Patil A; Tiwari K N. 2018. Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of okra under subsurface drip with and without plastic mulch. Curr. Sci., 115(12), 2249-2258.

Patil C S. 2010. Crop coefficient and water requirement of okra (Abelmoschus Esculentus L. Moench). Mausam, 61(1), 121-124.

Ramachandran J; Lalitha R; Vallal K S. 2021. Estimation of site-specific crop coefficients for major crops of Lalgudi Block in Tamil Nadu using remote sensing-based algorithms. J. Agric. Eng., 58 (1), 62-72. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2021581.1735

Sagar A; Hasan M; Singh D K; Al-Ansari N; Chakraborty D; Singh M C; Iquebal M A; Kumar A; Malkani P; Vishwakarma D K; Elbeltagi A. 2022. Development of smart weighing lysimeter for measuring evapotranspiration and developing crop coefficient for greenhouse Chrysanthemum. Sensors (Basel), 22(16), 6239. https://doi:10.3390/s22166239

Schmidt C D S; Pereira F A C; Oliveira A S de; Júnior J F G; Vellame LM. 2013. Design, installation and calibration of a weighing lysimeter for crop evapotranspiration studies. Water Resour. Irrig. Manage., 2(2), 77-85.

Sharma V; Singh P K; Bhakar S R; Yadav K K; Lakhawat S S; Singh M. 2021. Pan evaporation and sensor based approaches of irrigation scheduling for crop water requirement, growth and yield of okra. J. Agrometeorol., 23(4), 389-395.

Thokal R T; Sanap P B; Thorat T N; Thaware B G; Chavan S A. 2020. Influence of irrigation regimes, crop spacing and fertilization methods on growth and yield of okrain coastal region of Maharashtra. J. Agric. Eng., 57 (4), 349-363. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2018551.1727

Tyagi N K; Sharma D K; Luthra S K. 2000. Determination of evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of rice and sunflower with lysimeter. Agric. Water Manage., 45, 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(99)00071-2

Varughese A; Menon J S; Mathew E K. 2014. Effect of fertigation levels and drip system layout on performance of okra under plastic mulch. J. Agric. Eng., 51(4), 28-32.

Vu S H; Watanabe H; Takagi K. 2005. Application of FAO-56 for evaluating evapotranspiration in simulation of pollutant runoff from paddy rice field in Japan. Agric. Water Manage., 76(3), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.01.012

Wheeler A J; Ganji A R. 2010. Introduction to Engineering Experimentation. Prentice Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Third edition, pp: 480.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-09

Issue

Section

Regular Issue

How to Cite

H. W. Awari, V. K. Ingle, U. M. Khodke, & K. A. Balore. (2023). Determination of Crop Coefficient of Okra Crop Using Lysimeter for Semi-arid Climatic Condition of Parbhani, Maharashtra. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 60(3), 311-319. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2023603.1816