Ergonomic Assessment of Walk-behind Battery-powered Two-wheel Weeder
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2024612.1842Abstract
Various types of manual weeders are developed for mechanical weeding in line sown crops to reduce the potential losses in the crop production system. Forces required for an operation of weeder is up to 384 N. An ergonomic study was conducted on a walk-behind type battery-powered two-wheel weeder for physiological aspects, discomfort, rapid entire body assessment (REBA) and postural parameters to assess discomfort/ drudgery on operator. The battery-powered weeder was studied with two attachments: three-tine shovel type and sweep type cultivators. The average heart rate of subjects was recorded at 120 and 114 beats.min-1 with shovel type and sweep type cultivators, respectively. It was found that energy expenditure of subjects reduced by 28.5% to 37.5% in battery-powered two-wheel weeder as compared to manual weeder. The average body parts discomfort score (BPDS) was 26.54 with shovel type cultivator and 23.35 with a sweep type cultivator. The average twisting velocity, sagittal flexion and maximum lateral velocity of subjects during operation of battery-powered weeder with sweep type and shovel type cultivators were 4.33 to 4.55degrees s-1, 24.47 to 24.97degrees and 65.55 to 67.63 degreess-1. The REBA score indicates need for possible modification in design of handle as per anthropometric dimensions in existing battery powered unit/weeder. The field capacity of the battery-powered two-wheel weeder was 0.0515 and 0.0434 ha h-1 with a shovel type cultivator and sweep type cultivator, respectively.
Downloads
References
Biswas H S. 1990. Soil tool interactions for mechanical control of weeds in black soils. Unpublished Docotral dissertation, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India.
Chethan C R; Ananthakrishnan D. 2017. Dynamic push–pull strength data generation for agricultural workers to develop manual dryland weeders. Curr. Sci., 113, 1601-1605.
Corlett E N; Bishop R P. 1976. A technique for assessing postural discomfort. Ergon., 19, 175-182.
Gite L P ; Yadav B G. 1985. Anthropometric data for farm equipment design. Silver Jublee Convention of ISAE at Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal, 29-31 October.
Gite L P; Yadav BG. 1990. Optimum handle height for a push-pull type manually operated dryland weeder. Ergon., 33, 1487-1494.
Hignett S; McAtamney L. 2000. Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). Appl. Ergon., 31, 201–205.
IARI Annual Report. 2021. Two-wheel battery-assisted (Electrical) power unit. ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 104p.
Kiran Uday M. 2022. Studies on ergonomical evaluation of battery-assisted weeder. Unpublished M Tech dissertation, Division of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.
Kumar A; Tandon S K; Saxena J P. 2002. Ergonomic evaluation of weeders. Jour. of Agri. Engin., 39 (4), 17-22.
Mohanty S K; Jena Prerana Priydarsini; Mishra J N. 2016. Development of dry land weeders with ergonomic principles for higher efficiency. Int. Jour. of Inno. Sci., Engin. & Tech., 3 (3), 340-348.
Nag P K. 1981. Predicting maximal oxygen uptake of workers engaged in agricultural tasks, J Human Ergol., 10, 25-33.
Nag P K; Datt P. 1979. Effectiveness of some simple agricultural weeders with reference to physiological responses. J. Human Ecology, 8, 13-21.
Nag P K; Sebastian N C; Malvanker M G. 1980. Occupational workload of Indian agricultural workers. Ergon., 23 (2), 91-102.
Singh S; Dave A K; Padhee D; Kulhariya S K; Yadav N K. 2020. Performance evaluation of manually operated weeder. Jour. of Pharma. and Phytochem., 9, 1370-1374.
Singh S P. 2013. Ergonomical evaluation of hand operated maize dehusker-sheller with farm women. Agric. Engg. Int., 15 (2), 1-8.
Singh S P; Kumar Adarsh. 2022. Ergonomics and safety in agricultural operations. E-training Manual (TB-ICN:287/2022), Division of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 1- 239p.
Singh S P; Singh M K; Solanki R C. 2016. Design and development of four-wheel weeder for wide-row crops. Ind. Jour. of Agri. Sci., 86 ( 1), 42-49.
Sinha J; Singh J K; Kumar A. 2018. Ergonomic assessment of wheel hoe and design compliance for women farm worker. Ind. Jour. of Agri. Sci., 88 (3), 447–452.
Tewari V K; Datta R K; Murthy A S R. 1991. Evaluation of three manually operated weeding devices. App. Ergo., 22 (2), 111-116.
Yadav R; Pund S. 2007. Development and ergonomic evaluation of manual weeder. Agric. Engg. Int.. 9, October 1-9.
Windle W F. 1980. The spinal cord and its reaction to traumatic injury: Anatomy, physiology, pharmacology, therapeutics. New York, NY: M Dekker, xi, 384.
