Development and Performance Evaluation of Three Row Floating Type Weeder for Small Rice Farms

Authors

  • P. Dhananchezhiyan Dept. of Farm Machinery & Power Engineering, Agricultural Engineering College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India Author
  • Pravitha P. Nair Agricultural Engineering College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India Author
  • R. Kavitha Dept. of Farm Machinery & Power Engineering, Agricultural Engineering College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India Author
  • R. Madhumitha Agricultural Engineering College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India Author
  • T. Murugananthini Agricultural Engineering College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India Author
  • P. Ishwarya Agricultural Engineering College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2025624.1972

Keywords:

coulter weeder, floating weeder, power weeder, wetland weeder, weeding efficiency

Abstract

Weed management is one of the major challenges in agriculture practices. Mechanical weed control has emerged as an efficient and cost-effective alternative to the labour-intensive practice of manual weeding. However, the evolving demands of the agricultural sector, particularly in terms of food safety and consumer preferences have led to the need for more efficient weed control methods. A power-operated three-row floating type weeder for rice field was designed and developed. The machine was powered by 1.3 kW petrol engine and consisted of a power transmission system, handle assembly, two drive weeding rollers, one driven weeding roller and coulters. Field evaluations were conducted at three forward speeds (1.0, 1.2, and 1.4 km h⁻¹) and three water levels (10, 20, and 30 mm) to assess operational performance. Results revealed that the maximum weeding efficiency (92%) was achieved at forward speed of 1.0 km h⁻¹ with a water level of 30 mm, while the highest field capacity (0.085 ha h⁻¹) was recorded at 1.4 km h⁻¹ under the same condition. The lowest plant damage (1.5%) occurred at 1.4 km h⁻¹ and water level of 10 mm. However, when all three performance indicators of weeding efficiency, field capacity and plant damage were considered together, the combination of 1.2 km h⁻¹ forward speed and 30 mm water level was found to provide the best overall operational performance with weeding efficiency of 91%, field capacity of 0.082 ha h⁻¹ and plant damage of 1.15%. Therefore, this combination is recommended as the optimum operating condition for the developed floating weeder. Overall, the developed weeder exhibited efficient performance, minimum operator drudgery, and proved suitable for small- and medium-scale wetland paddy cultivation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

DA&FW. (2024). Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2024. Economics, Statistics & Evaluation Division, Department of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare (DA&FW). Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi. https://desagri.gov.in/document-report-category/agriculture-statistics-at-a-glance/.

Dhananchezhiyan, P., Parveen, S., Karpoora Sundara Pandian, N., & Rangasamy, K. (2013). Development and comparative study of cast iron rasp bar and nylon rasp bar threshing cylinders for paddy threshing. Scientific Journal Agricultural Engineering, 38(4), 45-54.

ESCAP. (1983). RNAM test codes and procedures for farm machinery. Technical Series No. 12, Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12870/8242 (accessed on 30 November 2025).

Gatkal, N. R., Nalawade, S. M., Shelke, M. S., Sahni, R. K., Walunj, A. A., Kadam, P. B., & Ali, M. (2025). Review of cutting-edge weed management strategy in agricultural systems. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 18(1), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20251801.9583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20251801.9583

IBM Corp. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 20.0) [Computer software]. IBM Corp., Armonk, NY

Imran, S. S., Senthilkumar, T., Manikandan, G., & Krishnapriyan, M. S. (2025). Development of a smart remote-controlled system for four-wheel paddy transplanter with anti-collision safety system and vision-assistance system for precision agriculture. Results in Engineering, 28, 107520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107520

Jat, D., Imran, S. S., & Chethan, C. R. (2023). Tractor-drawn weeder to manage weeds in garlic grown on raised beds. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 55(1), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2023.00014.X DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2023.00014.X

Kumar, A. A., Haribabu, B., Rao, A. S., & Someswararao, C. (2013). Ergonomical evaluation of manually operated weeder under wet land condition. Scientific Research and Essays, 8(6), 249-255. https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE2012.0752

Madhusudan, B. S., Dhananchezhiyan, P., Chowdhury, M., & Anand, R. (2025). Design, development and evaluation of a power-operated cono weeder for wetland rice farming. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 62(3), 551-563. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2025623.1946 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2025623.1946

Mahilang, K. K. S., Choudhary, S., Victor, V. M., Naresh, & Sonboier, K. K. (2017). Design and development of power operated rotary weeder for rice. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 24(5), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.9734/CJAST/2017/37844 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/CJAST/2017/37844

Mohanty, D. K., & Mohanty, M. K. (2010). Assessment of yield using cono weeder in SRI method of paddy cultivation. Agricultural Engineering Today. 34(1), 21-24.

Mohapatra, P. K., Sarkar, R. K., Panda, D., & Kariali, E. (2025). Tillering Behaviour of Rice Plant. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981 97-5235-5

Monira, S, Ali, M. I., Sarker, U. K., Islam, M. S., Zaman, F., Begum, M., & Uddin, M. R. (2022). Efficacy and economics of different weed control practices in boro rice under high Ganges River floodplain of Bangladesh. Journal of Agriculture, Food and Environment, 3(3), 32-39. ttps://doi.org/10.47440/JAFE.2022.3307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47440/JAFE.2022.3307

Olaoye, J. O., & Adekanye, T. A. (2011). Analysis of the motion of weeding tools and development of a rotary power weeder. Journal of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, 19(2), 9-25.

Paul, S., Nath, B. C., Huda, M. D., Bhuiyan, M. G. K., & Paul, H. (2025). Assessment of mechanical weeders in paddy fields: A study on operational effectiveness in Bangladesh. Heliyon, 11(4), e42639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42639 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42639

Remesan, R., Roopesh, M. S., Remya, N., & Preman, P. S. (2007). Wetland paddy weeding: A comprehensive comparative study from South India. Agricultural Engineering International: The CIGR Ejournal, 9(2), 07-11.

Rodenburg, J., Saito, K., Irakiza, R., Makokha, D. W., Onyuka, E. A., & Senthilkumar, K. (2015). Labor saving weed technologies for lowland rice farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. Weed Technology, 29(4), 751-757. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-15-00016.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-15-00016.1

Sebastian, S. & Kalita, K. (2022). Study on comparative performances of selected paddy weeders developed in India. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 59(4), 333-345. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2022594.1786 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2022594.1786

Tang, H., Xu, C., Wang, Q., Zhou, W., Wang, J., Xu, Y., & Wang, J. (2021). Analysis of the mechanism and performance optimization of burying weeding with a self-propelled inter row weeder for paddy field environments. Applied Sciences, 11(21), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11219798 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11219798

Terzaghi, K., Peck, R. B., & Mesri, G. (1996). Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. 512 pp.

Vencill, W. K., Nichols, R. L., Webster, T. M., Soteres, J. K., Mallory Smith, C., Burgos, N. R., Johnson, W.G., & McClelland, M.R. (2012). Herbicide resistance: toward an understanding of resistance development and the impact of herbicide-resistant crops. Weed Science, 60(SP1), 2-30. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-11-00206.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-11-00206.1

Vijayakumar, M., Sundar Singh, S. D., Prabhakaran, N. K., & Thiyagarajan, T. M. (2005). Effect of SRI (System of Rice Intensification) practices on the yield attributes, yield and water productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Agronomica Hungarica, 52(4), 399-408. https://doi.org/10.1556/AAgr.52.2004.4.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/AAgr.52.2004.4.9

Published

2025-12-08

How to Cite

Dhananchezhiyan, P., Nair, P. P., Kavitha, R., Madhumitha, R., Murugananthini, T., & Ishwarya, P. (2025). Development and Performance Evaluation of Three Row Floating Type Weeder for Small Rice Farms. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 62(4), 853-862. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2025624.1972