Development and Performance Evaluation of a Low-cost Winnower for Dry Coffee Cherry

Authors

  • T. N. Sandeep Central Coffee Research Institute, Coffee Research Station, Chikkamagaluru -577 117, Karnataka, India Author
  • B. B. Channabasamma Central Coffee Research Institute, Coffee Research Station, Chikkamagaluru -577 117, Karnataka, India Author
  • T. N. Gopinandhan Central Coffee Research Institute, Coffee Research Station, Chikkamagaluru -577 117, Karnataka, India Author
  • J. S. Nagaraja Central Coffee Research Institute, Coffee Research Station, Chikkamagaluru -577 117, Karnataka, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2022594.1787

Keywords:

Air velocity, Coffea arabica L, Coffea canephora, cleaning efficiency, dry cherry coffee, winnower

Abstract

The normal practice of coffee planters for cleaning dried cherry is time consuming, labourious, and totally depends on natural wind conditions. A low-cost power-operated dry cherry winnower was, therefore, developed at Central Coffee Research Institute, Karnataka. The dry cherry winnower consisted of a hopper, blower unit (exhaust fan), cherry outlet, and frame with an overall dimension of 1.28 (L) x 0.7 (W) x 1.63 (H) m. Arabica (Coffea arabica L) and robusta (Coffea canephora) cherry coffees were used for testing. During evaluation, cherry sample from main outlet, dried leaves and twigs from foreign materials outlet were collected to determine various parameters viz., percentage of blown cherry, cleaning efficiency, and output capacity. Air velocity of 4 m.s-1 was effective with lower percentage of blown cherry. Cleaning efficiency of arabica cherry was 99.85%, 99.73%, and 98.85% at 20, 25, and 30 kg.min-1 feed rate, respectively. Similarly, the cleaning efficiency of robusta cherry was 99.74%, 99.11%, and 98.53% at 20, 25, and 30 kg.min-1 feed rates. The output capacity ranged from 1,200 kg.h-1 to 1,807 kg.h-1 for arabica cherry, and 1,220 kg.h-1 to 1,821 kg.h-1 for robusta cherry. Higher cleaning efficiency of 99.85% and 99.74% were recorded for arabica and robusta cherry, respectively, at 20 kg.min-1 feed rate and 4 m.s-1 air velocity. The average power consumption was 0.375 kW.h. The cost of operation of the winnower was 105 `.h-1. The estimated cost of the winnower was `.16,000 per unit. The operational cost and time of winnowing could be reduced by 67% and 72%, respectively, by using the winnower when compared to conventional winnowing.

Author Biographies

  • T. N. Sandeep, Central Coffee Research Institute, Coffee Research Station, Chikkamagaluru -577 117, Karnataka, India

    Agricultural Engineer

  • B. B. Channabasamma, Central Coffee Research Institute, Coffee Research Station, Chikkamagaluru -577 117, Karnataka, India

    Research Assistant

  • T. N. Gopinandhan, Central Coffee Research Institute, Coffee Research Station, Chikkamagaluru -577 117, Karnataka, India

    Divisional Head

  • J. S. Nagaraja, Central Coffee Research Institute, Coffee Research Station, Chikkamagaluru -577 117, Karnataka, India

    Joint Director (Research)

References

Ajayi A B; Olasunkanmi L K. 2013. Development of groundnut chaff removing machine. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Invent., 2, 45-51.

Afonso J P C; Correa P C; Pinto F A C; Queiroz D M. 2007. Aerodynamic properties of coffee cherries and beans. Biosyst. Eng., 98(1), 39-46.

Anon. 1983. Green coffee - Determination of loss in mass at 105o C. International Organization Standardization, 6673, Geneva, pp: 17.

Anon. 2014. Coffee Guide: A Manual of Coffee Cultivation. Central Coffee Research Institute, Government of India, Coffee Research Station, Chikkamagaluru district, Karnataka, India, 141-151.

Anon. 2022. Database on Coffee. Coffee Board of India, pp:1-6. https:// www.indiacoffee.org/databasecoffee.html. Viewed on 30th March 2021. Anup B; Arjya U S; Jyoti R S; Suprava K; Markandeya M. 2020. Development and evaluation of a hand operated double chain-sprocket winnower for cereal crops. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., 9(3), 871-879.

Bhupendra G; Kunal K; Uma C; Shweta Y. 2019. Development and testing of solar operated paddy winnower. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem., 8(5), 1368- 1370.

Chandrasekar V; Viswanathan R. 1999. Physical and thermal properties of coffee. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 73, 227-234.

Channabasamma B B; Sandeep T N; Gopinandhan T N; Nagaraja J S. 2022. Post-harvest evaluation of arabica and robusta coffee for physical, mechanical and aerodynamic properties. J. Plant Crops (manuscript accepted for publication)

Ganga K; Rajkumar P; Sudha P; Deepa J; Subramanian P; John K. 2022. Engineering properties of neem (Azadirachta indica) fruit and seed for the development of depulper and decorticator. Emer Life Sci Res, 8(1), 207-223.

Gelgelo K; Gizachotafara; Merga W; Melesetaresa. 2018. Adaptation and evaluation of Japan model engine operated winnower. Int. J. Eng. Res., 6(2), 23-27.

Hunt D R. 2001. Farm Power and Machinery Management. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, 10th Edition.

Krishna P S; Pradeep P; Bivek B; Bim P S. 2017. Mathematical modelling simulation and analysis of rice grain movement for design and fabrication of low-cost winnowing machine. J. Mech. Eng. Res., 9(1),1-14.

Kuala S I; Hidayat D D; Anggara C E W; Saparita R. 2019. Characterization and evaluation of physical and mechanical properties of unhulled arabica coffee bean. Earth Environ. Sci., 251(1),1-8.

Mahdi M; Asghar M; Mohammad R A; Shamsollah A. 2020. Effect of awn on aerodynamic properties of paddy grains (Oryza Sativa L.). Agric. Eng. Int., 22(2), 208-216.

Mohsenin N N. 1986. Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials. Gordon and Breach Publishers, New York.

Rahul G K; Dhande K G. 2016. Performance evaluation of power operated paddy winnower. Int. J. Agric. Eng., 9 (1), 47-52.

Samreen M; Madhava; Rama Rao A. 2017. Performance evaluation of solar power operated paddy winnower. Int. J. Eng. Technol. Sci. Res., 4(8),1088- 1094.

Singh Y; Prasad K. 2013. Physical characteristics of some of the paddy varieties as affected by shelling and milling operations. Oryza, 50(2),174-180.

Published

2022-12-12

Issue

Section

Regular Issue

How to Cite

T. N. Sandeep, B. B. Channabasamma, T. N. Gopinandhan, & J. S. Nagaraja. (2022). Development and Performance Evaluation of a Low-cost Winnower for Dry Coffee Cherry. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 59(4). https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2022594.1787