Effect of Bioengineering Measures on Runoff, Soil and Nutrient Losses under Cashew Plantations in Western Ghat Region

S. Manivannan; A. K. Sikka; B. L. Manjunath; S. Priya Devi; J. Ashok Kumar

doi:10.52151/jae2007444.1294

Authors

S. Manivannan ICAR Research Complex for Goa, Ela, Old Goa 403 402, Goa Author
A. K. Sikka ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Walmi Complex, Patna 801 505. Author
B. L. Manjunath ICAR Research Complex for Goa, Ela, Old Goa 403 402, Goa Author
S. Priya Devi ICAR Research Complex for Goa, Ela, Old Goa 403 402, Goa Author
J. Ashok Kumar ICAR Research Complex for Goa, Ela, Old Goa 403 402, Goa Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2007444.1294

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted on lateritic soil of Western Ghat region in Goa State to study the effect of bioengineering measures viz. Half Moon Terraces + Vetiveria zizanioides + Stylosanthes scabra, continuous contour trench + Vetiveria zizanioides + Stylosanthes scabra, graded trench + Vetiveria zizanioides + Stylosanthes scabra, staggered contour trench + Vetiveria zizanioides + Stylosanthes scabra and semi elliptical trench + Vetiveria zizanioides + Stylosanthes scabra on runoff, soil and nutrient loss and growth of cashew. The study revealed that the bioengineering measures influenced the runoff, soil and nutrient losses and growth parameters of cashew. The reduction of runoff varied from 3.2 to 7.6% of the annual rainfall under different conservation treatments. Minimum runoff(3.5%) and soil loss (3.7 t/ha/year) were recorded under the treatment viz. continuous contour trench + Vetiveria zizanioides + Stylosanthes scabra. Minimum Nitrogen (13.95 kg/ha) and phosphorous (16.53 kg/ha) losses were recorded ill the treatment of continuous contour trenches with Stylosanthes scabra and Vetiveria zizanioides. Growth performance ofcashew was better under the combination of vegetative barriers with continuous contour trenches, graded trenches and staggered contour trenches. Overall, continuous contour trenches with Stylosanthes scabra and Vetiveria zizanioides was found to be the best soil and water conservation treatment among all other bioengineering measures for cashew plantations in Western Ghat region.

References

Anonymous. 1990. Effect of watershed development on runoff, soil and nutrient loss in high rainfall area of Konkan, Maharashtra State. In: Proc. of symposium on Role of soil and water conservation for increasing agricultural production held at K.K.V., Dapoli.

Anonymous. 1998.Anote on Western Ghat development programme. Union planning commission, Government of India, New Delhi.

Badhe V T; Magar S S. 2004. Influence of different conservation measures on runoff, soil and nutrient loss under cashewnut in lateritic soils of South Konkan region. Indian J. Soil. Cons., 32(2), 143-147.

Chinnamani S. 1989. Effectiveness ofsoil conservation measures. J. Agric. Engng., 24,148-154.

Hadda M S; Sur H S; Sandhu B S. 2001. Runoff and soil loss in foot hills of Shiwaliks. Indian J. Soil. Cons., 29(1), 14-17.

Kale S R; Ramteke J R; Kadrekar S B. 1988. Effect of land development on run off retardance under lateritic soil. Indian J. Soil Cons., 16(1), 55-51.

Madhu M; Sikka A K; Tripathi K P; Ragupathy R; Singh DV. 200 I. Contour staggered trenching and cover crop for soil and water conservation in new tea plantations in the Nilgiris. Indian 1. Soil Cons., 29(1), 1-6.

Mukesh Chand; Suraj Bhan. 2000. Effect of vegetative barriers on Erosion loss, soil properties andyield of sorghum. Indian J. Soil Cons., 28 (3), 250-252.

Rai R N; Singh A. 1986. Effect of hill slopes on runoff, soil loss and nutrient loss and rice yield. Indian J. Soil Cons., 14(2), 1-6.

Sikka A K; Singh D V; Samra J S. 200 I. Characteristic features, zonation and problems of Western Ghats for natural resource management. Indian 1. Soil Cons., 29(2), 107-117.

Vinod V R; Syed Anwarulla M; Vishwanath DP. 2003. Runoff and soil loss under different land use systems in the Western Ghats of Karnataka. Indian J. Soil Cons., 31(2),131-138.