Effect of Moisture Conservation Measures on Runoff, Soil Loss and Yield of Upland Rice

B. Panigrahi

doi:10.52151/jae2007443.1284

Authors

B. Panigrahi Professor (Soil & Water Cons. Engg.). WMP, RRTTS, (OUAT), Chiplima, Sambalpur 768025, Orissa. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2007443.1284

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during 2002 and 2003 in light textured eroded sloping land to study the effect of moisture conservation measures on runoff, soil loss and yield of upland rainfed rice in Balijorenala watershed, Orissa. Total six treatments Le. (i) T₁, - fallow without any crop and conservation measures (control), (ii) T2 crops grown without any conservation measures, (iii) T3 - vetiver grass planted in paired rows, (iv) T4, miniature bund with vetiver grass, (v) Tj - miniature bund with natural grass and (vi) T6 - V-ditch with vetiver grass were taken for the study. The treatment T6 was found to be superior to other treatments since it produced lowest average seasonal runoff and soil loss of 18.2% and 1.71 t/ha, respectively. On the other hand, the treatment T, was observed to generate highest amount of average seasonal runoff and soil loss with values of 28.0% and 6.13t/ha, respectively. The yield of rice was found to be maximum with treatment T6 with a mean value of 19.1 q/ha whereas that for treatment T2' it was the lowest (13.1 q/ha). Thus, there was 45.8% increase in rice yield due to the maximum utilization of stored soil moisture in treatment T6 compared to treatment T2 • Considering the effectiveness in reducing runoff, soil loss and enhancing the crop yield, treatment T6 is recommended as the best in-situ moisture conservation measures for rainfed upland farming system in sloppy land of Orissa.

References

Anonymus. 1995. Booklet on Upland Rice Research Achievement and Perspective. Central Rainfed Upland Rice Research Station, Hazaribagh, India.

Chanappa T C. 1994. In situ moisture conservation in arid and semi-arid tropics. Indian J. Soil Cons., 22 (I &2), 27-41.

Greb B W; Smika D E; Black A L. 1967. Effect of straw mulch rates on soil water storage during summer fallow in great plains. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 31, 536559.

Hadda M S; Sur H S. 1987. Effect of land modifying measures on erosion, nutrient, water storage and yield of pearl-millet fodder. J. Indian Soil Sci., 35, 480-436.

Narayana V V D. 1979. Rainwater management for low land rice cultivation in India. J. Irrig. and Drain. Div., Proc., (ASCE), 105(1), 87-98.

Pisharoty P R. 1990. Indian rainfall and water conservation. Proceedings of all India Seminar on Modern Techniques of Rainwater Harvesting, Water Conservation and Artificial Recharge for Drinking Water, Directorate of Groundwater Surveys and Development Agency, Government of Maharashtra.

Pujhari D K. 1994. Effect of vegetative filters and cropping systems on runoff, soil loss and productivity. Unpublished M. Tech. Thesis, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar.

Radder G D; Itnal C J; Surkod V S; Biradar B M. 1991. Compartment bunding-an effective in situ moisture conservation practice on medium deep black soil. Indian J. Soil Cons., 19 (1&2), 1-5.

Ranade D H; Jain L K; Gupta R K; McCool D K. 1997. Comparative performance of mechanical and vegetative soil conservation measures in vertisols. Indian 1. Soil Cons., 25(3), 182-185.

Subbaiah R. 1991. Decision support for managing rainwater-a case study. J. Agric. Engng., 1(1), 59-65.

Subudhi C R; Senapat P C. 1996. Runoff and soil loss under different vegetative measures in Kalahandi district of Orissa. Indian J. Soil Cons., 24(2), 82-83.

Subudhi C R; Pradhan PC; Senapati P C. 1998. Effect. of vegetative barrier on soil erosion and yield of rice in Eastern Ghats. Indian J. Soil Cons., 26(2), 95-98.