Application of Soil and Water Assessment Tool for Runoff Simulation in a Data Scarce Himalayan Watershed

Tabasum Rasool; Rohitashw Kumar

doi:10.52151/jae2019562.1685

Authors

Tabasum Rasool College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar Campus, Srinagar-190025, Jammu and Kashmir. Author
Rohitashw Kumar College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar Campus, Srinagar-190025, Jammu and Kashmir Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2019562.1685

Keywords:

Dal watershed, runoff, SWAT model, GIS, remote sensing

Abstract

The present study was conducted to simulate runoff in the watershed of Dal (188.72 km2 ) located in the temperate region of Kashmir using Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). The study watershed is characterized by significant climatic contrast, abrupt topography, and soil fragility, thereby resulting in flash floods and water erosion. Such situation requires interventions to preserve soil and water resources, and a decision tool for integrated watershed management. The SWAT was calibrated for the year 2010, and validated for the year 2011, based on a comparison of simulated and observed monthly runoff at the watershed outlet. The model performance was evaluated using coefficient of determination (R2 ), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (ENS), relative root means square error (RRMSE) and percent bias (PBIAS). During the calibration period, R2 , ENS, RRMSE and PBIAS were 0.98, 0.87, 1.3 and (-) 26, respectively. During the validation period, the values of R2 , ENS, RRMSE and PBIAS were 0.97, 0.84. 1.1 and (-) 26.0, respectively. The modelled values showed reasonably good agreement with the observed values of runoff, both during calibration and validation periods. The runoff in the watershed was quantified under the prevailing land use conditions. The study demonstrated a satisfactory application of the SWAT model for quantification of hydrological processes in a watershed under data scarce condition.

Author Biographies

Tabasum Rasool, College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar Campus, Srinagar-190025, Jammu and Kashmir.

Research Scholar
Rohitashw Kumar, College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar Campus, Srinagar-190025, Jammu and Kashmir

Professor

References

Arnold J G; Williams J R; Srinivasan R; King K W. 1998. SWAT: Soil and Water Assessment Tool. User’s Manual, USDA Agriculture Research Service Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, 808 East Blackland Road Temple, TX 76502, pp: 190.

Badar B; Romshoo S A; Khan M A. 2013. Modelling watershed hydrological responses in a Himalayan Lake as a function of changing land use and land cover. J. Earth Syst. Sci., 122(2), 433-449.

Beasley D B; Huggins L F; Monke E J. 1980. ANSWERS: A model for watershed planning. Trans. ASAE, 23(4), 938-944.

Chu T W; Shirmohammadi A. 2004. Evaluation of the SWAT model’s hydrology component in the piedmont physiographic region of Maryland. Trans. ASAE, 47(4), 1057-1073.

Easton Z M; Fuka D R; White E D; Awulachew S B; Ahmed A A; Steenhuis T S. 2010. A multi basin SWAT model analysis of runoff and sedimentation in the Blue Nile, Ethiopia. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 7, 3837-3878.

Frankenberger J R; Brooks E S; Walter M T; Water M F; Steenhuis T S. 1999. A GIS-based variable source area hydrology model. Hydrol. Process., 13(6), 805-822.

Guo J; Su X L; Singh V P; Jin J M. 2016. Impacts of climate and land use/cover change on streamflow using SWAT and a separation method for the Xiying River Basin in north-western China. Water, 8 (192),1-14.

Gupta H V; Sorooshian S; Yapo P O. 1999. Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: Comparison with multilevel expert calibration. J. Hydrol. Eng., 4(2), 135-143.

Huang Y F. 2003. GIS-based distributed model for simulating runoff and sediment load in the Malian River Basin. Hydrobiologia, 494(2), 127-134.

Jadhao V G; Jadhao A K; Tripathi M P. 2010. Estimation of monthly surface runoff and sediment yield from a small watershed by using simulation technique. Int. J. Agric. Eng., 2(2), 278-284.

Jain S; Tyagi J; Singh V. 2010. Simulation of runoff and sediment yield for a Himalayan watershed using SWAT Model. J. Water Resour. Prot., 2(3), 267-281.

Jinfeng W; Gao Y; Wang S. 2018. Assessing the response of runoff to climate change and human activities for a typical basin in the Northern Taihang mountain. China. J. Earth Syst. Sci., 127(37), 1-15.

Kim J G; Park Y; Yoo D; Kim N W; Engel B A; Lim K J. 2009. Development of a SWAT Patch for better estimation of sediment yield in steep sloping watersheds. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 45(4), 963-972.

Knisel W G. 1980. CREAMS: A Field Scale Model for Chemicals, Runoff and Erosion from Agricultural Management Systems. Conservation Report No 26, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, pp: 640.

Kumar S; Dhaimodkar S B; Pande L M. 2002. The assessment of potential land use in the proposed irrigation command using remote sensing and GIS. J. Indian Soc. Remote, 3(3), 157-166.

Maji A K; Reddy G P O; Sarkar D. 2010. Degraded and Wastelands of India: Status and Spatial Distribution. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, pp; 167.

Mishra H; Denis D M; Suryavanshi S; Kumar M; Srivastava S K; Denis A F; Kumar R. 2017. Hydrological simulation of a small ungauged agricultural watershed Semrakalwana of Northern India. Appl. Water Sci., 7(6), 2803-2815.

Moriasi D N; Arnold J G; Van Liew M W; Bingner R L; Harmel R D; Veith T L. 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans. ASABE, 50(3), 885-900.

Nash J E; Sutcliffe J V. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models: Part 1. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282-290.

Neitsch S L; Arnold J G; Kiniry J R; Williams J R. 2005. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2005. Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, Texas, USA, pp: 476.

Odusanya A E; Mehdi B; Schürz C; Oke A O: Awokola O S; Awomeso J A; Adejuwon J O; Schulz K. 2019. Multi-site calibration and validation of SWAT with satellite-based evapotranspiration in a data-sparse catchment in southwestern Nigeria. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1113-1144.

Pandey V K; Panda S N; Sudhakar S. 2005. Modelling of an agricultural watershed using remote sensing and a geographic information system. Biosyst. Eng., 90(3), 331-347.

Panhalkar S S. 2014. Hydrological modelling using SWAT model and geoinformatic techniques. Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Space Sci., 17(2), 197-207.

Parajuli P B. 2010. Assessing sensitivity of hydrologic responses to climate change from forested watershed in Mississippi. Hydrol. Process., 24(26), 3785-3797.

Phomcha P; Wirojanagud P; Vangpaisal T; Thaveevouthti T. 2011. Modelling the impacts of alternative soil conservation practices for an agricultural watershed with the SWAT model. Procedia Eng., 32,1205-1213.

Qiu L J; Zheng F L; Yin R S. 2012. SWAT-based runoff and sediment simulation in a small watershed, The loessial hilly-gullied region of China: Capabilities and challenges. Int. J. Sediment Res., 27, 226-234.

Rao C S; Lal R; Prasad J V N S; Gopinath K A; Singh R; Jakkula V S; Sahrawat K L; Venkateswarlu B; Sikka A K; Virmani S M. 2015. Potential and Challenges of Rainfed Farming in India. Adv. Agron., 133,113-181.

Rao E P; Prabhanjan A; Eldho T I. 2012. Sediment yield modelling using SWAT and Geo-Spatial technologies. In: Proc. International SWAT Conference, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, 647-658.

Saxton K E; Willey P H. 2006. The SPAW model for agricultural field and pond hydrologic simulation. In: Singh V P; Frevert D K (Eds.) Watershed models. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl, 401-435.

SCS (Soil Conservation Services). 1972. National Engineering Handbook, Section 4: Hydrology. Chapter 10, United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC, 10.1-10.2.

Singh V P; Woolhiser D A. 2002. Mathematical modelling of watershed hydrology. J. Hydrol. Eng., 7, 270-292.

Singh J; Knapp H V; Demissie M. 2004. Hydrologic modeling of the Iroquois river watershed using HSPF and SWAT. ISWS CR 2004-08, Champaign, Ill.: Illinois State Water Survey. Available at www.sws.uiuc.edu/pubdoc/CR/ISWSCR2004-08.pdf. (Accessed on 8 September, 2005).

Smith R. 1992. OPUS, An integrated Simulation Model for Transport of Nonpoint Sources Pollutants at the Field Scale. Volume I: Documentation, ARS-98, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC, pp. 120.

Srinivasan R; Arnold J G. 1994. Integration of basin scale water quality model with GIS. Water Res. Bull., 26(4), 611-620.

Srinivasan R; Zhang X; Arnold J G. 2010. SWAT ungauged: Hydrological budget and crop yield predictions in the upper Mississippi river basin. Trans. ASABE, 53(5), 1533-1546.

Tyagi J V; Rai S P; Qazi N; Singh M P. 2013. Assessment of discharge and sediment transport from different forest cover types in lower Himalaya using Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). Int. J. Water Res. Environ. Eng., 6(1), 49-66.

USDA. 1986. Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. Technical Release No. 55 (TR-55), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service, Conservation Engineering Division, Washington DC, pp. 2.1-2.16.

Walkley A; Black I A. 1934. An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci., 37, 29-37.

Wang H; Sun F B; Xia J; Liu W B. 2017. Impact of LUCC on streamflow based on the SWAT model over the Wei river basin on the Loess Plateau in China. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1929-1945.

Williams J R; Nicks A D; Arnold J G. 1985. Simulator for water resources in rural basins. J. Hydraulic Eng.,111(6), 970-986.

Yen H; Wang X; Fontane D G; Harmel R D; Arabi M A. 2014. Framework for propagation of uncertainty contributed by input data, parameterization, model structure, and calibration/ validation data in watershed modeling. Environ. Model. Softw., 54, 211-221.

Yen H; White M J; Jeong J; Arabi M; Arnold J G. 2015. Evaluation of alternative surface runoff accounting procedures using SWAT model. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 8(3), 54-68.

Zhang L; Lu J; Chen X; Liang D; Fu X; Sauvage S; Perez J M S. 2017. Stream flow simulation and verification in ungauged zones by coupling hydrological and hydrodynamic models: A case study of the Poyang lake ungauged zone. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5847-5861.

Zhang X; Srinivasan R; Van Liew M. 2008. Multisite calibration of the SWAT model for hydrologic modeling. Trans. ASABE, 51(6), 2039-2049.