Thin Layer Drying Kinetics of Indian Blackberry (Syzygium cumini L.) Pulp

Authors

  • Brajesh K. Panda Agricultural and Food Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, West Bengal Author
  • Gayatri Mishra Agricultural and Food Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, West Bengal Author
  • Rajesh K. Vishwakarma ICAR-Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology, Abohar, Punjab Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2019562.1681

Keywords:

Drying kinetics, Indian blackberry pulp, drying models, drying rate, activation energy

Abstract

Drying kinetics of fruit has importance in estimating optimum nutritional retainability, preservation requisites and process economy while processing into useful products. Drying kinetics of pulp of local variety of Indian blackberry was studied in a cabinet dryer. The drying experiment was conducted at 50 ºC, 60 ºC and 70 ºC, and moisture losses were recorded at 30-min intervals. Drying took place in two falling rate periods. Shift of first to second falling rate period was found to be irrespective of temperature, and started from 1.08 g water.g−1 dry matter. The drying data of Indian blackberry pulp was fitted into five commonly used Newton, Page, Peleg, Henderson and Pabis, and Logarithmic thin layer drying models. The logarithmic model adequately described the drying of Indian blackberry pulp. The activation energy values in first and second falling rate periods were 42.20 kJ.mol−1 and 61.62 kJ.mol−1, respectively.

Author Biographies

  • Brajesh K. Panda, Agricultural and Food Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, West Bengal

    Ph.D. Research Scholar

  • Gayatri Mishra, Agricultural and Food Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, West Bengal

    Ph.D. Research Scholar

  • Rajesh K. Vishwakarma, ICAR-Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology, Abohar, Punjab

    Principal Scientist, 

References

Aghbashlo M; Kianmehr M H; Arabhosseini A. 2008a. Energy and exergy analyses of thin-layer drying of potato slices in a semi-industrial continuous band dryer. Drying Technol., 26, 1501-1508.

Aghbashlo M; Kianmehr M H; Samimi-Akhijahani H. 2008b. Influence of drying conditions on the effective moisture diffusivity, energy of activation and energy consumption during the thin-layer drying of berberis fruit (Berberidaceae). Energy Convers. Manag., 49, 2865-2871.

Akpinar E K. 2006. Determination of suitable thin layer drying curve model for some vegetables and fruits. J. Food Eng., 73, 75-84.

Alaguselvi K; Ramanathan M; Jayashree E. 2009. Concentration of mango pulp by thin layer hot air method. J. Food Sci. Technol., 46(4), 350-353.

AOAC. 2000. Official Method of Analysis. No. 934.06. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, USA.

Arora S; Shivhare U S; Ahmed J; Raghavan G S V. 2003. Drying kinetics of Agaricus bisporus and Pleurotus florida mushrooms. Trans. ASAE, 46, 721-724.

Barh D; Viswanathan G. 2008. Syzygium cumini inhibits growth and induces apoptosis in cervical cancer cell lines: A primary study. Ecancer Med. Sci., 83 (2), 1-9.

Basu S; Shivhare U S; Mujumdar A S. 2006. Models for sorption isotherms for foods: A review. Drying Technol., 24 (8), 917-930.

Bruce D M. 1985. Exposed-layer barley drying, three models fitted to new data up to 150°C. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 32, 337-347.

Chong C H; Law C L; Cloke M; Hii C L; Abdullah L C. 2008. Drying kinetics and product quality of dried Chempedak. J. Food Eng., 88, 522-527.

Doymaz I. 2004. Convective air drying characteristics of thin layer carrots. J. Food Eng., 61, 359-364.

Doymaz I. 2005. Drying behaviour of green beans. J. Food Eng., 69(2), 161-165.

Gagare S; Mudgal V D; Champawat P S. 2017. Convective drying of turmeric rhizome. J. Agric. Eng., 54(2), 33-38.

Guine R P F; Fernandes R M C. 2006. Analysis of the drying kinetics of chestnuts. J. Food Eng., 76, 460-467.

Gujral H S; Oberoi D P S; Singh R; Gera M. 2013. Moisture diffusivity during drying of pineapple and mango leather as affected by sucrose, pectin, and maltodextrin. Int. J. Food Prop., 16(2), 359-368.

Gupta R K; Sharma A; Kumar P; Vishwakarma R K; Patil R T. 2014. Effect of blanching on thin layer drying kinetics of aonla (Emblica officinalis) shreds. J. Food Sci. Technol., 51(7), 1294-1301.

Jha S N; Kachru R P. 1998. Physical and aerodynamic properties of makhana. J. Food Process Eng., 21(4), 301 - 316.

Kelly L G. 1967. Handbook of Numerical Methods and Applications. Addison-Wesley, Boston, First Edition, 105-110.

Kingsly A R P; Singh D B. 2007. Drying kinetics of pomegranate arils. J. Food Eng., 79, 741-744.v Kumar V; Shrivastava S L. 2017. Vacuum-assisted microwave drying characteristics of green bell pepper. Int. J. of Food Studies, 6(1), 67-81.

Matteo M D; Cinquanta L; Galiero G; Crescitelli S. 2002. Physical pre-treatment of plums (Prunus domestica). Part 1. Modelling the kinetics of drying. Food Chem., 79, 227-232.

Okos M R; Narsimhan G; Singh R K; Weitnauer A C. 1992. Food dehydration. In: Handbook of Food Engineering. Heldman D R; Lund D B (Eds.), Marcel Dekker, New York, 437-562.

Planinic M; Velic D; Tomas S; Bilic M; Bucic A. 2005. Modelling of drying and rehydration of carrots using Peleg’s model. Eur. Food Res. Technol., 221(3- 4), 446-451.

Rai D R; Tyagi S K; Jha S N; Mohan S. 2008. Qualitative changes in broccoli (Brassica oleracea italic). J. Food Sci. Technol., 45(3), 247 – 250.

Rai D R; Chadha S; Kaur M P; Jaiswal P; Patil R T. 2011. Biochemical, microbiological and physiological changes in Indian blackberry (Syzyium cumini L.) kept for long term storage under modified atmosphere packaging. J. Food Sci. Technol., 48(3), 357-365.

Torki-Harchegani M; Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti M; Ghanbarian D; Sadeghi M; Tohidi M. 2016. Dehydration characteristics and mathematical modelling of lemon slices drying undergoing oven treatment. Heat Mass Transfer, 52, 281-289.

Vishwakarma R K; Shivhare U S; Nanda S K. 2013. Water absorption kinetics of guar seeds and unhulled guar splits. Food Bioprocess Technol., 6, 1355-1364.

Published

2019-06-30

Issue

Section

Regular Issue

How to Cite

Brajesh K. Panda, Gayatri Mishra, & Rajesh K. Vishwakarma. (2019). Thin Layer Drying Kinetics of Indian Blackberry (Syzygium cumini L.) Pulp. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 56(2), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2019562.1681