Yield Variability Assessment in Paddy Crop using Automatic Yield Monitoring System

Authors

  • N. S. Chandel Agricultural Mechanization Division AICRP on ESA, ICAR - Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal-462038 Author
  • K. N. Agrawal AICRP on ESA, ICAR - Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal-462038, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2019563.1687

Keywords:

Automatic yield monitor, GPS, indigenous grain combine harvester, variability map, optical sensor

Abstract

A study was conducted to assess yield variability of paddy crop using automatic yield monitoring (AYM) system fitted on an indigenous grain combine harvester. Algorithms were developed to assess the on-farm yield variability and classify the field in different yield zones. Yield maps were created using ArcGIS and open source GeoDa software for four years (2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017). The calibration factor (CF) of AYM system for paddy crop was 6.79. Yield variations were recorded in one ha plot, and classified in five different yield zones of<1900 kg.ha-1, 2000-2999 kg.ha-1, 3000-3999 kg.ha-1, 4000-4999 kg.ha-1, and >5000 kg.ha-1. Variation in actual yield and yield measured by automatic yield monitor varied from (+) 2.8 to (+)5.1 per cent. Maximum temporal variability (14.7 %) was observed between the year 2014 and 2017. The AYM system could show the real-time temporal and spatial variability classification and quantification in paddy field.

Author Biographies

  • N. S. Chandel, Agricultural Mechanization Division AICRP on ESA, ICAR - Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal-462038

    Scientist

  • K. N. Agrawal, AICRP on ESA, ICAR - Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal-462038, India

    Project Coordinator

References

Anon. 2013. Bhopal District Ground Water Information. Central Ground Water Board, North Central Region, Bhopal, Ministry of Water Resources. http://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/MP/Bhopal.pdf

Arslan S; Colvin T S. 2002. An evaluation of the response of yield monitors and combines to varying yields. Precis. Agric., 3,107-122.

Chandel N S; Mehta C R; Tewari V K; Nare B. 2016. Digital map-based site-specific granular fertilizer application system. Curr. Sci., 111(7), 1208-1213.

Chandel N S; Agrawal K N; Tiwari P S; Golhani K; Tripathi H. 2013. IDW interpolation of soybean yield data acquired by automated yield monitor. Int. J. Sci. Emerging Technol. Latest Trends, 13 (1), 36-45.

Clifford D; McBratney A B; Taylor J; Whelan B M. 2006. Generalized analysis of spatial variation in yield monitor data. J. Agric. Sci., 144, 45-51.

Drummond S T; Sudduth K A; Joshi A; Birrell S J; Kitchen N R. 2003. Statistical and neural methods for site–specific yield prediction. Trans. ASAE, 46 (1), 5-14.

Ge Y; Thomasson J A; Sui R; Morgan C L. 2009. A module-specific post-processing calibration method to improve cotton yield mapping. Comput. Electron. Agric., 68(2),161-167.

Griffin T W; Dobbins C L; Vyn T J; Florax R J; Lowenberg-DeBoer J M. 2008. Spatial analysis of yield monitor data: Case studies of on-farm trials and farm management decision making. Precis. Agric., 9, 269-283.

Kargarpour H; Razavi J; Hemmat A; Salar M R. 2016. Design and evaluation of a yield monitoring system for combinable crops. Agric. Eng. Int: CIGR J., 18(3), 84-93.

Massey R E; Myers D B; Kitchen N R; Sudduth K A. 2008. Profitability maps as an input for site specific management decision making. Agron. J., 100 (1), 52-59.

Mondal P; Basu M. 2009. Adoption of precision agriculture technologies in India and in some developing countries: Scope, present status and strategies. Prog. Nat. Sci., 19, 659-666.

Perry C D; Vellidis G. 2008. Evaluating performance of new generation cotton yield monitors. In: Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN, 594-603.

Pringle M J; McBratney A B; Whelan B M; Taylor J A. 2003. A preliminary approach to assessing the opportunity for site-specific crop management in a field, using yield monitor data. Agric. Syst., 76, 273-292.

Sezer I; Balkaya A; Karaagac O; Oner F. 2011. Moisture dependent of some physical and morphological properties of dent corn (Zea mays var. Indentete Sturt) seeds. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 10(15), 2857-2866.

Sharma K; Singh M; Singh B; Sharma A; Mishra P K. 2012. Development and evaluation of grain yield monitoring system. J. Agric. Eng., 49(4), 1-8.

Singh M; Singh J; Sharma A. 2011. Development of a batch type yield monitoring system for grain combine harvester. J. Agric. Eng., 48(4), 10-16.

Singh M; Kumar R; Sharma A; Mishra P K; Sharma K. 2013. Evaluation of yield monitoring system installed on indigenous grain combine harvester for rice crop. Agric. Eng. Int.: CIGR J., 15(3), 148-153.

Terra J A; Reeves D W; Shaw J N; Raper R L. 2005. Impacts of landscape attributes on carbon sequestration during the transition from conventional to conservation management practices on a Coastal Plain field. J. Soil Water Conserv., 60(6), 438-446.

Published

2019-09-30

Issue

Section

Regular Issue

How to Cite

N. S. Chandel, & K. N. Agrawal. (2019). Yield Variability Assessment in Paddy Crop using Automatic Yield Monitoring System. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 56(3), 158-165. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2019563.1687