Drying Characteristics of Plum Tomato under Different Physical Treatments for Producing Powder

Authors

  • Abhay Kumar Thakur Author
  • Indu Shekhar Singh Author
  • Vidya Bhushan Shambhu Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2019564.1694

Keywords:

Plum tomato, physical treatment, drying, mathematical modelling, powder quality

Abstract

Plum tomatoes were dried under hot air convection for producing powder. Different physical treatments were performed to achieve faster drying and milling. Initial moisture of tomato was 93.97 % with TSS of 4.6 %, which was dried to around 5 % moisture. Among the treatments, longitudinally cut in 16 pieces and cross-section slice segments took less time to dry and gave higher (6.4 %) drying yield. The effectiveness of treatments on drying characteristics and quality of tomato powder were examined. Mathematical models were employed by non-linear regression analysis to appropriately describe the drying behaviours. The physico-chemical quality characteristics of fresh and powder tomato were evaluated in terms of size and shape, peel pulp seed ratio, TSS, ascorbic acid, acidity, lycopene and solubility. The overall sensory perception revealed that all treatment samples of tomato powder reconstituted well in the form of soup-mix and achieved nearly equal scores on different quality attributes.

References

Abadio F D B; Domingues A M; Borges S V; Oliveira V M. 2004. Physical properties of powdered pineapple (Ananascomosus) juice - effect of malt dextrin concentration and atomization speed. J. Food Eng., 64(3), 285-287.

Akanbi C T; Adeyemi R S; Ojo A. 2006. Drying characteristics and sorption isotherm of tomato slices. J. Food Eng., 73,141-146.

Albano E E; Ma H; Qu W. 2011. Influence of air temperature on the drying kinetics and quality of tomato slices. J. Food Process. Technol., 2,123. doi:10.4172/2157-7110.1000123

Alexandre Santos de S; Soraia V B; Natalia F M; Havandro V R; Aline D A. 2008. Spray-dried tomato powder: Reconstitution properties and colour. Braz. Arch. Bio. Technol., 51(4), 807-814.

Anon. 2018. Monthly Report on Tomato. Horticulture Statistics Division, Department of Agriculture Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, 2-3.

Brooker D B; Bakker-Arkema F W; Hall C W. 1974. Drying Cereal Grain. The AVI Publishing Co, Inc, Connecticut, pp: 265.

Brooks M S; Abou El-Hana N H; Ghaly A E. 2008. Effects of tomato geometries and air temperature on the drying behaviour of plum tomato. Am. J. Appl. Sci., 5 (10), 1369-1375.

Cernisev S. 2010. Effects of conventional and multistage drying processing on non-enzymatic browning in tomato. J. Food Eng., 96(1),114-118.

Chhinman M S. 1984. Evaluation of selected mathematical models for describing thin-layer drying of in-shell pecans. Trans. ASAE, 27, 610-615.

Chang C H; Lin H Y; Chang C Y; Liu Y C. 2006. Comparisons on the antioxidant properties of fresh, freeze-dried and hot-air-dried tomatoes. J. Food Eng., 77, 478-485.

Davoodi G; Vijayanad P; Kulkarni G; Ramana V R. 2007. Effect of different pre-treatments and dehydration methods on quality characteristics and storage stability of tomato powder. LWT Food Sci. Technol., 40 (10), 1832-1840.

Doymaz I. 2007. Air-drying characteristics of tomatoes. J. Food Eng., 78, 1291-1297.

Doymaz I. 2010. Evaluation of mathematical models for prediction of thin-layer drying of banana slices. Int. J. Food Prop., 13(3), 486-497.

Doymaz I; Ozdemir O. 2014. Effect of air temperature, slice thickness and pretreatment on drying and rehydration of tomato. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 49, 558-564.

Giovanelli G; Zanoni B; Lavelli V; Nani R. 2002. Water sorption, drying and antioxidant properties of dried tomato products. J. Food Eng., 52, 135-141.

Jafari S; Khazaei J; Arabhosseini A; Massah J; Khoshtaghaza M H. 2011. Study on mechanical properties of sunflower seeds. Electron. J. Pol. Agric. Univ., 14(1), 06.

Khazaei J; Chegini G R; Bakhshiani M. 2008a. A novel alternative method for modelling the effects of air temperature and slice thickness on quality and drying kinetics of tomato slices: superposition technique. Drying Technol., 26, 759-775.

Khazaei J; Jafari S; Noorolahi S. 2008b. Lognormal vs. Normal and Weibull distributions for modeling the mass and size distributions of sunflower seeds and kernels. In Proc.: World conference on Agricultural Information and IT Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo, Japan, 24-27 August, 91-105.

Koocheki A; Razavi S M A; Milani E; Moghadam T M; Abedini M; Alamatiyan S; Izadkhah S. 2007. Physical properties of watermelon seed as a function of moisture content and variety. Int. Agrophy., 21(4), 349-359.

Laxmi B; Vimla V. 2000. Nutritive value of dehydrated green leafy vegetable powders. J. Food Sci. Technol., 37, 465-471.

Lavine Gustav. 2012. A Guide to SPSS for analysis of variance. Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017.

Lui O; Bakker-Arkema F W. 1997. Stochastic modeling of grain drying, Part 2: Model development. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 66, 275-280.

Midilli A; Kucuk H. 2005. Mathematical modeling of thin layer drying of Pistachio by using solar energy. Energy Conver. Manage., 44(7),111-1122.

Purkayastha M D; Mahanta C L. 2011. Physicochemical properties of five different tomato cultivars of Meghalaya and their suitability in food processing. Afr. J. Food Sci., 5(12), 657-667.

Purkayastha M D; Nath A; Deka B C; Mahanta C L. 2013. Thin layer drying of tomato slices. J. Food Sci. Technol., 50(4), 642-653.

Ranganna S. 2000. Handbook of Analysis and Quality Control for Fruit and Vegetable Products. 2nd Ed., Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co. Ltd, New Delhi, 662-667.

Sahin F H; Aktas T; Orak H; Ulger P. 2011. Influence of pretreatments and different drying methods on color parameters and lycopene content of dried tomato. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 17 (6), 867-881.

Subramanian R. 2016. India Processing Tomato Segment: Current Status, Trends and Opportunies for Engagement. World Vegetable Centre, No. 16-806, pp: 28.

Subukola O P; Dairo O U; Sanni L O; Odunewu A V; Fafiolu B O. 2007. Thin layer drying process for some leafy vegetables under open sun. Food Sci. Technol. Int., 13, 35-40.

Takeoka Gary; Dao Lan; Flessa Stephan; Gillespie David; Jewell William; Huebner Britta; Bertow Daniel; Ebeler Susan. 2001. Processing effects on lycopene content and antioxidant activity of tomatoes. J. Agric. Food Chem., 49, 3713−3717.

Thakur A K; Jain R K. 2006. Studies on drying characteristics of cauliflower. J. Food Sci. Technol., 43,182-185.

Thakur A K; Saharan V K; Gupta R K. 2010. Drying of ‘Perlette’ grape under different physical treatment for raisin making. J. Food Sci. Technol., 47 (6), 626-631.

Published

2019-12-31

Issue

Section

Regular Issue

How to Cite

Abhay Kumar Thakur, Indu Shekhar Singh, & Vidya Bhushan Shambhu. (2019). Drying Characteristics of Plum Tomato under Different Physical Treatments for Producing Powder. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 56(4), 258-268. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2019564.1694