Isometric Cranking and Steering Strength of Agricultural Workers in Central India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2009462.1368Abstract
Hand cranking is the most common method of transferring power from human muscles to many stationery farm machines. On the other hand, steering torque is required for controlling tractors and other selfpropelled machines. A study was carried out to collect isometric cranking and steering strength on male as well as female agricultural workers in Madhya Pradesh. A strength measurement set-up developed at CIAE, Bhopal was used for the purpose. The mean age, stature and weight of 944 male workers were 29.8 ± 9.5 years, 1649 ± 59 mm and 51.2 ± 6.4 kg, respectively whereas the corresponding values for 757 female workers were 33.7 ± 8.2 years, 1519 ± 54 mm and 45.0 ± 7.3 kg. The mean values for isometric cranking strength in standing posture at a crank length of 265 mm by preferred hand and both hand operation were 44.1± 9.1 N.m and 50.6 ± 10.2 N.m, respectively for male workers and 31.9 ± 8.6 N.m and 37.3 ± 10.4 N.m, respectively for female workers. The mean values of steering strength in sitting posture with a steering wheel of 420 mm diameter at 700 from horizontal were 64.0± 18.8 and 40.5 ± 10.0 N.m for male and female workers, respectively. The isometric cranking and steering strengths of male workers were higher than those of female workers (p<0.001). The 5th percentile cranking strength values for preferred hand and both hands were 29.2 and 33.8 N.m, respectively for male workers and 17.7 and 20.1 N.m, respectively for female workers. The 5th percentile steering strength was 33.1 and 24.0 N.m for male and female workers respectively. For continuous operation of hand crank operated machines, the cranking effort required for operation should not exceed 30% of the maximum static cranking strength by both hands. The maximum effort requirement for steering wheel (420 mm diameter) by male workers should not exceed 19.86 N-m.
Downloads
References
Agrawal K N; Singh R K P; Satapathy K K. 2009. Isometric strength of agricultural workers of Meghalaya: A case study of an Indian population. Int. J. of IndustrialErgonomics, 39(6), 919-923.
Anon. 2005. Progress report 2002-2005. AICRP on Ergonomics and Safety in Agriculture, TNAU centre. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 47-48.
Anon. 2007. Progress report 2005-2007. AICRP on Ergonomics and Safety in Agriculture, Kharagpur centre. Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur.
Bressel E; Bressel M; Masquez M; Heise G D. 2001. The effect of hand grip position on upper extremity neuromuscular response to arm cranking exercise. Journal of Electromyography, 11(4), 291-298.
Das H; Bhatattacharya S. 1984. Optimum design and location of a hand operated rotary device. Journal of Agril. Engg, 21(3), 29-36.
Dewangan K N; Prasanna Kumar G V; Suja P L; Choudhury M D. 2005. Anthropometric dimensions of farm youth of the north eastern region of India. Int. Jr.of Industrial Ergonomics, 35(11), 979-989.
Dewangan K N; Owary C; Datta R K. 2008. Anthropometric data of female farm workers from north eastern India and design of hand tools of the hilly region. Int. Jr. of Industrial Ergonomics, 38(1), 90-100.
Frymoyer J W; Pope M H; Constanza M C. 1980. Epidemiologic studies of low back pain. Spine, 5, 419-423.
Gite L P; Chatterjee D. 1999. All India anthropometric survey of agricultural workers- Proposed action plan. All India Coordinated Research Project on Human Engineering and Safety in Agriculture, Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal.
Gite L P; Yadav B G. 1989. Anthropometric survey for agricultural machinery design. Appl. Ergon, 20, 191–196. Grandjean E. 1980. Fitting the task to the man – An ergonomic approach. Taylor & Francis Ltd., London.
Gupta P K; Gupta M L; Sharma A P. 1983. Anthropometric survey of Indian farm workers. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, America and Latin America, 14, 27–30.
Kroemer K H E. 1970. Human strength: Terminology, measurement and interpretation of data. Human Factors, 12(3), 297-313.
Kumar A; Bhaskar G; Singh J K. 2009. Assessment of control layout of Indian tractors. Applied Ergonomics, 40(1), 91-102.
Kumar S. 1991. Arm lift strength in workspace. Applied Ergonomics, 22(5), 317-328.
Kumar S; Narayan Y; Bacchus C. 1995. Symmetric and asymmetric two-handed pull-push strength of young adults. Human Factors, 37(4), 854-865.
Mehta C R; Tiwari P S; Rokade S; Pandey M M; Pharade S C; Gite L P; Yadav S B. 2007. Leg strength of Indian operators in the operation of tractor pedals. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37, 283–289.
NASA. 1978. Anthropometric Source Book Vol-I. Reference Publication 1024, Scientific and Technical Office, Washington D.C., U.S.A.
Patel R; Adarsh K; Mohan D. 2000. Development of an ergonomical facility for Indian tractors. Appl. Ergon, 31, 311–316.
Pheasant S T. 1981. Ergonomics, Work and Health. Mc Milan, London.
Sen R N; Nag P K; Ray G G. 1977. Some anthropometry of people of eastern India. Journal of Indian Anthropological Society, 12, 201-208.
Snook S H. 1978. The design of manual handling tasks. Ergonomics, 21(132), 963-985.
Swensen T; Maskhsiso P; Hawley E T. 1993. The effect of moderate resistance weight raising on peak arm aerobic power. International Journal of Sports and Medicine, 4(1), 43-47.
Tiwari K. 2001. Ergonomical evaluation of tractor operator’s workplace and activity. Unpublished M. Tech. Thesis, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur, India.
Van Wely P. 1970. Design and disease. Applied Ergonomics, 1, 262-269.
Waters R Thomas; Anderson Vern Putz; Garg Arun; Lawrence J Fine. 1993. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics, 36(7), 749-776.
Yadav R; Tewari V K. 1998. Tractor operator’s workplace design- a review. Journal of Terramechanics, 35(1), 44-53.
