Neuro-Fuzzy Modelling of Reference Evapo-transpiration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2008454.1347Abstract
Reference evapo-transpiration (ETo) can be either directly estimated using lysimeter or water balance approach, or estimated indirectly using the climatological data. However, it is not always possible to obtain ETo value using lysimeter, as it is a time consuming method and needs precise and carefully planned experiments. Owing to the difficulty of obtaining accurate field measurements, reference evapo-transpiration is generally estimated from weather parameters. The FA0 Penman-Monteith method has now been accepted as standard method to estimate reference evapo-transpiration. However, it requires several weather Ā parameters. The ensuing study is an attempt to predict ETo using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with fewer and simple weather data for Nagini watershed, located near Charnba-Ranichauri, on Rishikesh-Uttarkashi route, in Tehri Garhwal district of Uttarakhand, India. The ETO predicted hy adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system was found to be comparable with the ETo estimated by FA0 Penman-Monteith method. The developed model was validated by testing its performance using correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.931, root mean square error (RMSE = 0.48) and coefficient of variation of the residual error (CVRE = 0.17). It shows the applicability of developed neuro-fuzzy model to predict ETU for future events. Apart from this, developed model requires lesser input variables than the input required by different empirical methods.
Downloads
References
Allen R G; Pereira L S; Raes D; Smith M. 1998. Crop evapo-transpiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage paper No. 56. FAO, Rome, Italy.
ASCE Task Committee. 2000. Artificial neural network in hydrology. J. Hydrologic Engng., 5(2), 124-144.
Bowden G J; Maier H R: Dandy G C. 2002. Optimal division of data for neural networks models in water resources applications. Water Resour. Res., 38(2), 10.1 O29/2OO 1 WR000266.
Chen W C; Chang N; Chen J. 2003. Rough set-based hybrid fuzzy-neural controller design for industrial wastewater treatment. Water Res., 37, 95- 107.
Jang J S R. 1993. ANFIS: adaptive network based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 23(3), 665-683.
Jang J S R; Sun C T. 1995. Neuro-fuzzy modelling and control. In: Roc. of IEEE 83 (3), 378-406.
Jensen M E; Burman R D; Allen R G. 1990. Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements. Manual and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 70, New York, ASCE.
Legates D R; McCabe Jr G J. 1999. Evaluating the use of goodness of fit measures in hydrologic hydro-climatic model validation. Water Resour. Res.. 35 (I), 233-241.
Luchetta A; Manetti S. 2003. A real time hydrological forecasting system using artificial fuzzy clustering approach. Computers & Geosciences, 29, 11 11 - 11 17.
Monteith J L. 1965. Evaporation and surface temperature. Quart. Journal Roy. Meteorlogical Society, 107, 1-27.
Nayak P C; Sudheer K P; Rangan D M; Ramasastri K. S. 2004. A neuro-fuzzy computing technique for modelling hydrological time series. J. Hydrology, 291, 52-66.
Odhiambo L 0; Yoder R E; Yoder D C; Hines J W.200 1. Optimization of fuzzy evapotranspiration model through neural training with input-output examples. Trans. ASAE, 44 (6), 1625-1633.
Sahoo G B; Ray C; Wade H F. 2005. Pesticide prediction in ground water in North Carolina domestic wells using artificial neural networks. Ecological Modelling, 183 (1-2), 29-46.
Schaap M G; Leij F J. 1998. Database related accuracy and uncertainty of pedotransfer functions. Soil Sci., 163,765-779.
Smith M; Allen R G; Pereira L S; Raes D. 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration. FA0 Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, FAO, Rome, Italy.
Takagi T; Sugeno M. 1985. Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modelling and control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 15 (I), 116-132.
Tay J; Zhang X. 2000. A fast predicting neural fuzzy model for high-rate anaerobic wastewater treatment system. Water Res., 34(11), 2849-2860





