Specific Torque Requirement of Different Tractor PTO Operated Active Tillage Machinery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2026632.2002Keywords:
active tillage implements, regression analysis, specific PTO torque, torque modelling, tractor-implement matchingAbstract
The study aims to evaluate and compare the specific Power Take-Off (PTO) torque requirement of four active tillage implements - rotavator, double rotor rotavator, PTO-driven disc tiller, and power harrow under varying forward speeds and tillage depths. The findings intend to assist in optimal tractor-implement matching, enhance energy efficiency, and inform design improvements in tillage machinery. Field experiments were conducted on sandy loam soil using a New Holland 4010 tractor at three speeds (2.2, 3.6, and 4.8 km h-1) and depths (80, 100, and 120 mm). PTO torque was measured using a torque and power monitoring system. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with three replications. Statistical analysis was conducted, and regression models were developed using non-linear least squares optimization. Results revealed that specific PTO torque requirement significantly increased with both forward speed and tillage depth (p < 0.01). Among the implements, the rotavator exhibited the lowest average specific torque requirement (133.9 N-m m-1), while the power harrow and PTO-driven disc tiller showed the highest (168.9 and 164.8 N-m m-1, respectively) average specific torque requirement. Regression models indicated a quadratic relationship between forward speed and torque and a linear relationship with depth. The developed models exhibited high predictive accuracy, with R² ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 across the four implements. The torque requirement of active tillage implements is significantly influenced by implement type, forward speed, and tillage depth. These findings highlight the importance of selecting appropriate implements, and operating parameters to optimize energy use and reduce mechanical stresses on tractors. The developed regression models offer practical utility for estimating specific torque requirements under varying field conditions.
Downloads
References
Ahmadi, I. (2017). A power estimator for an integrated active-passive tillage machine using the laws of classical mechanics. Soil and Tillage Research, 171, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.04.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.04.006
ASAE Standards. (2023). ASAE S313.3(R2023)- Soil Cone Penetrometer. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA.
Balsari, P., Biglia, A., Comba, L., Sacco, D., Alcatrao, L. E., Varani, M., Mattetti, M., Barge, P., Tortia, C., Manzone, M., & Gay, P. (2021). Performance analysis of a tractor-power harrow system under different working conditions. Biosystems Engineering, 202, 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.11.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.11.009
Behera, A., Raheman, H., & Thomas, E. V. (2021). A comparative study on tillage performance of rota-cultivator (a passive-active combination tillage implement) with rotavator (an active tillage implement). Soil and Tillage Research, 207, 104861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104861 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104861
BIS.(1973). IS: 2720 Part II: Method of test for soils: Part II : Determination of water content. Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, New Delhi, India.
BIS.(1975). IS: 2720 Part 29: Method of Test for Soils, Part 29: Determination of dry density of soils in-place by the core-cutter method. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
Choudhary, S., Upadhyay, G., Patel, B., Naresh, & Jain, M. (2021). Energy requirements and tillage performance under different active tillage treatments in sandy loam soil. Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 46, 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42853-021-00112-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42853-021-00112-y
Destain, M. F., & Houmy, K. (1990). Effects of design and kinematic parameters of rotary cultivators on soil structure. Soil and Tillage Research, 17(3-4), 291-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(90)90042-C DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(90)90042-C
Ghosh, B. N. (1967). The power requirement of rotary cultivator. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 12(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8634(67)80030-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8634(67)80030-1
Hensh, S., Tewari, V. K., & Upadhyay, G. (2021a). A novel wireless instrumentation system for measurement of PTO (power take-off) torque requirement during rotary tillage. Biosystems Engineering, 212, 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.10.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.10.015
Hensh, S., Tewari, V. K., & Upadhyay, G. (2021b). An instrumentation system to measure the loads acting on the tractor PTO bearing during rotary tillage. Journal of Terramechanics, 96, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2021.04.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2021.04.004
Hoki, M., Burkhardt, T. H., Wilkinson, R. H., & Tanoue, T. (1988). Study of P.T.O. driven powered disc tiller. Transactions of ASAE, 31(5), 1355-1360. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.30870 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.30870
Kheiralla, A. F., Yahya, A., Zohadie, M., & Ishak, W. (2004). Modelling of power and energy requirements for tillage implements operating in Serdang sandy clay loam, Malaysia. Soil and Tillage Research, 78(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2003.12.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2003.12.011
Kim, M. H., Nam, J. S., & Kim, D. C. (2013a). Comparison of tillage and loads characteristics of three types of rotavators: Rotary-type, crank-type, and plow-type. Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 38(2), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2013.38.2.073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2013.38.2.073
Kim, Y. J., Chung, S. O., & Choi, C. H. (2013b). Effects of gear selection of an agricultural tractor on transmission and PTO load during rotary tillage. Soil and Tillage Research, 134, 90-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.07.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.07.013
Kumar, S., Sihag, N., Upadhyay, G., Rani, V., Choudhary, S., & Patel, B. (2026). Influence of blade type and operating parameters of a rotavator on power demand and soil tillage quality. Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 51(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42853-026-00298-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42853-026-00298-z
Lee, D. H., Kim, Y. J., Chung, S. O., Choi, C. H., Lee, K. H., & Shin, B. S. (2015). Analysis of the PTO load of a 75 kW agricultural tractor during rotary tillage and baler operation in Korean upland fields. Journal of Terramechanics, 60, 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2015.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2015.06.002
Lourakis, M. I. (2005). A brief description of the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm implemented by levmar. Foundation of Research and Technology, 4(1), 1-6.
Machindra, R. A., & Raheman, H. (2017). Investigations on power requirement of active-passive combination tillage implement. Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food, 10, 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eaef.2016.06.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eaef.2016.06.004
Manian, R., & Kathirvel, K. (2001). Development and evaluation of an active-passive tillage machine. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America, 32(1), 9-18.
Marenya, M. O., & du Plessis, H. L. M. (2006). Torque requirements and forces generated by a deep tilling down-cut rotary tiller. ASAE Paper No. 061096, 2006 ASAE Annual Meeting (pp. 1-12). St. Joseph. MI: ASAE. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.20611
Marquardt, D. W. (1963). An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. Journal of the society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 11(2), 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1137/0111030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/0111030
Matin, M. A., Fielke, J. M., & Desbiolles, J. M. A. (2015). Torque and energy characteristics for strip-tillage cultivation when cutting furrows using three designs of rotary blade. Biosystems Engineering, 129, 329-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.11.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.11.008
Nataraj, E., Sarkar, P., Raheman, H., & Upadhyay, G. (2021). Embedded digital display and warning system of velocity ratio and wheel slip for tractor operated active tillage implements. Journal of Terramechanics, 97, 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2021.06.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2021.06.003
Nisha, K., Upadhyay, G., Patel, B., Choudhary, S., & Rani, V. (2023a). A tractor hydraulic assisted embedded microprocessor-based penetrometer for soil compaction measurement. Journal of Terramechanics, 110, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2023.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2023.07.003
Nisha, K., Upadhyay, G., Patel, B., Sihag, N., Choudhary, S., & Rani, V. (2023b). Analysis of soil compaction induced beneath the working depth due to tilling action of different active tillage machinery. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 21(4), e0210. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2023214-20351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2023214-20351
Roeber, J. B., Pitla, S. K., Hoy, R. M., Luck, J. D., & Kocher, M. F. (2017). Tractor power take-off torque measurement and data acquisition system. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 33(5), 679-686. https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.11994 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.11994
Salokhe, V. M., & Quang, N. B. (1995). Dynamics of a powered disk in clay soil. Journal of Terramechanics, 32(5), 231-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4898(95)00019-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4898(95)00019-4
Salokhe, V. M., & Ramalingam, N. (2003). Effect of rotation direction of a rotary tiller on draught and power requirements in a Bangkok clay soil. Journal of Terramechanics, 39(4), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4898(03)00013-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4898(03)00013-2
Sarkar, P., Upadhyay, G., & Raheman, H. (2021). Active-passive and passive-passive configurations of combined tillage implements for improved tillage and tractive performance: A review. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 19(4), e02R01. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2021194-18387 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2021194-18387
Upadhyay, G., & Raheman, H. (2018). Performance of combined offset disc harrow (front active and rear passive set configuration) in soil bin. Journal of Terramechanics, 78, 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2018.04.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2018.04.002
Upadhyay, G., & Raheman, H. (2019). Specific draft estimation model for offset disc harrows. Soil and Tillage Research, 191, 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.03.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.03.021
Upadhyay, G., & Raheman, H. (2020). Effect of velocity ratio on performance characteristics of an active-passive combination tillage implement. Biosystems Engineering, 191, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.12.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.12.010
Upadhyay, G., Kumar, N., Raheman, H., & Dubey, R. (2024). Predicting the Power requirement of agricultural machinery using ann and regression models and the optimization of parameters using an ANN–PSO technique. AgriEngineering, 6(1), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering6010012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering6010012
Upadhyay, G., Raheman, H., & Dubey, R. (2025). Regression models and multi-objective optimization using the genetic algorithm technique for an integrated tillage implement. AgriEngineering, 7(4), 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7040121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7040121
Usaborisut, P., & Prasertkan, K. (2018). Performance of combined tillage tool operating under four different linkage configurations. Soil and Tillage Research, 183, 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.06.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.06.004
Usaborisut, P., & Prasertkan, K. (2019). Specific energy requirements and soil pulverization of a combined tillage implement. Heliyon, 5(11), e02757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02757 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02757
