Physical and Thermal Properties of Untreated and Chemically Treated Rice Husk
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2007444.1299Abstract
Moisture depe'1dent physical and thermal properties of untreated, acid and alkali treated rice husk were evaluated in the moisture range of 5 to 35% (db). Moisture content had significant effect on the physical and thermal properties of rice husk. A significant difference in each property was found between untreated, acid and alkali treated husk. Bulk density of untreated, acid treated and alkali treated husk varied from 98-106.5, 91.5-102 and 59-64 kglm3 whereas the corresponding values of true density, angle of repose, specific heat, thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity varied as 1009-1054, 1004-1054,969-996 kglm3; 47-53.8, 47.252.4,46.9- 51.5 degrees; 1.098-2.754,0.976 to 2.548 and 0.875 to 2.33 kJ/(kg.K); 0.024 to 0.099, 0.023 to 0.092 and 0.026 to 0.102 J/(s.m.K), respectively. The bulk density, true density, angle of repose, specific heat, thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity increased linearly with increase in moisture content whereas the porosity decreased linearly. The values of bulk density, true density, angle of repose and specific heat were higher for untreated rice husk and were followed by acid and a1kal i treated husk. However, the values of thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity were higher for alkali treated husk and were followed by untreated and acid treated husk.
Downloads
References
Baryeh EA. 2002. Physical properties of millet. J. Food Engng., 51, 39-46.
Bharadwaj A; Wang Y; Sridhar S; Arunachalam V S. 2004. Pyrolysis of rice husk. Current Sci., 87(7), 981-986.
Chakraverty A; Kaleemullah S. 1991. Conversion of rice husk into amorphous silica and combustible gas. Energy Converso Mgt., 32, 565-570.
Chakraverty A; Majumdar A S; Raghavan G S V; Ramaswamy H S. 2003. Handbook of Postharvest Technology. Marcel Dekker, N. Y.
Chandrasekhar V; Vishwanathan R. 1999. Physical and thermal properties of coffee. J. Agric. Engng. Res., 73, 227-234.
Goncalves M R F; Bergmann C P. 2007. Thermal insulators made with rice husk ashes: Production and correlation between properties and microstructure. Construction and Building Materials, 21 (12), 2059-2065..
Govindrao V M H. 1980. Utilization of rice husk- A preliminary analysis. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 39, 495.
Houston D F. 1972. Rice: Chemistry and Technology. Am. Assoc. Cereal Chern.
Jain R K; Bal S. 1997. Physical properties of pearl millet. 1. Agric. Engng. Res., 66, 85-91.
Jasansky A; Bilansky W K. 1973. Thermal conductivity of whole and ground soybean. Trans. ASAE, 16, 100.
Kumagai S; Noguchi Y; Kurimoto Y; Takeda K. 2007. Oil adsorbent produced by the carbonization of rice husks. Waste Mgt., 27(4), 554-561.
Mishra P; Chakraverty A; Banerjee H D. 1986. Studies on physical and thermal properties of rice husk related to its industrial application. J. Mater. Sci., 21,2129-2131. 48-53
Mohsenin N N. 1980. Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials. Vol. 1. Gordon and Breach, London. Muir W E; Viravanichai S. 1972. Specific heat of wheat. J. Agric. Engng. Res., 17, 338.
Orgut'H. 1998. Some physical properties ofwhite lupin. J. Agric. Engng. Res., 69, 273-277. Sahoo P K; Srivastava A P. 2002. Physical properties of okra seed. Biosystems Engng., 83(4), 441-448.
Singh K K; Goswami T K. 1996. Physical properties of cumin seed. J. Agric. Engng. Res., 64,93-98.
Singh S K; Mohanty B C; Basu S. 2002. Synthesis of SiC from rice husk in a plasma reactor. Bull. Mater. Sci., 25(6), 561-563.
Suthar S H; Das S K. 1996. Some physical properties of karingda seeds. J. Agric. Engng. Res., 65, 15-22.
Turhan M; Gunasekaran S. 1999. Thermal properties of Fuzzy and Starch coated cottonseeds. J. Agric. Engng. Res., 74, 185-191.





