Catalytic Gasification of Coconut Shell for Producer Gas Yield Improvement: An Optimization Study with the Response Surface Methodology Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2026632.2005Keywords:
biomass gasification, calcium oxide, catalyst, chicken eggshellsAbstract
Catalytic biomass gasification is gaining momentum due to enhanced producer gas yield and effective tar cracking. In this study, coconut shell (feedstock) and calcium oxide (catalyst) were used in a downdraft biomass gasifier to determine optimal conditions through the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) approach, aiming for better gas generation. Waste chicken eggshells-based calcium oxide (CaO) was used as catalyst to evaluate its effectiveness in achieving improved producer gas yield and fuel quality. In optimization, the effect of two key process variables viz., equivalence ratio (0.2-0.3) and CaO loading (5-30 wt.%) were assessed on producer gas and its hydrogen content. The catalyst has more significant effect on final product yield than equivalence ratio. The maximum producer gas yield was achieved as 2.4 m³ kg-1 during catalytic gasification process with optimized conditions of equivalence ratio of 0.25 and catalyst loading of 29.14%. The tar removal efficiency was found to be 83.7%. Additionally, it was observed that the hydrogen content was significantly enhanced (30.86%) in catalytic gasification compared to non-catalytic gasification (12.74%) under optimal process conditions.
Downloads
References
Arun, K., Venkata Ramanan, M., & Mohanasutan, S. (2022). Comparative studies and analysis on gasification of coconut shells and corn cobs in a perforated fixed bed downdraft reactor by admitting air through equally spaced conduits. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 12(4), 1257-1269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00872-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00872-1
Asaithambi, P., Aziz, A. R. A., & Daud, W. M. A. B. W. (2016). Integrated ozone—electrocoagulation process for the removal of pollutant from industrial effluent: Optimization through response surface methodology. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 105, 92-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2016.03.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2016.03.013
ASTM International. (2009). Standard practice for ultimate analysis of coal and coke (ASTM D3176–09). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
ASTM International. (2011). Standard test method for volatile matter in the analysis sample of coal and coke (ASTM D3175–11). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
ASTM International. (2012). Standard test method for ash in the analysis sample of coal and coke from coal (ASTM D3174–12). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
ASTM International. (2013a). Standard practice for proximate analysis of coal and coke (ASTM D3172–13). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
ASTM International. (2013b). Standard test method for moisture analysis of particulate wood fuels (ASTM E871–82(2013)). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
ASTM International. (2019). Standard test method for gross calorific value of coal and coke by adiabatic bomb calorimeter (ASTM D2015–19). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
Awogbemi, O., Inambao, F., & Onuh, E. I. (2020). Modification and characterization of chicken eggshell for possible catalytic applications. Heliyon, 6(10), e05283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05283
Awogbemi, O., Vandi, D., & Aigbodion, V. (2022). Pathways for sustainable utilization of waste chicken eggshell. Journal of Renewable Materials, 10(8), 2217-2246. https://doi.org/10.32604/jrm.2022.019152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32604/jrm.2022.019152
Bermudez, J. M., & Fidalgo, B. (2016). Production of bio-syngas and bio-hydrogen via gasification. In: R. Luque, C. S. K. Lin, K. Wilson, & J. Clark (Eds), Handbook of biofuels production (ch. 15, pp. 431-494), Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100455-5.00015-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100455-5.00015-1
Couto, N., Rouboa, A., Silva, V., Monteiro, E., & Bouziane, K. (2013). Influence of the biomass gasification processes on the final composition of syngas. Energy Procedia, 36, 596-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.068
Dil, E. A., Ghaedi, M., Asfaram, A., & Bazrafshan, A. A. (2018). Ultrasound wave assisted adsorption of congo red using gold-magnetic nanocomposite loaded on activated carbon: Optimization of process parameters. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 46, 99-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.02.040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.02.040
Gai, C., & Dong, Y. (2012). Experimental study on non-woody biomass gasification in a downdraft gasifier. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37(6), 4935-4944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.12.031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.12.031
Gao, Y., Wang, M., Raheem, A., Wang, F., Wei, J., Xu, D., ..., & Zhang, H. (2023). Syngas production from biomass gasification: Influences of feedstock properties, reactor type, and reaction parameters. ACS Omega, 8(35), 31620-31631. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03050
Gupta, V., & Singh, K. P. (2025). Synergistic optimization of biodiesel production through waste eggshell-derived catalysts and machine learning integration for enhanced sustainability. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 46(1), 2444356. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2024.2444356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2024.2444356
He, Y., Tu, J., Li, D., Lin, C., Mo, Z., Huang, S., ..., & Wang, T. (2023). Investigation of hydrogen-rich syngas production from biomass gasification with CaO and steam based on real-time gas release behaviors. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 169, 105851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2022.105851 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2022.105851
Hoque, M. E., Rashid, F., & Aziz, M. (2021). Gasification and power generation characteristics of rice husk, sawdust, and coconut shell using a fixed-bed downdraft gasifier. Sustainability, 13(4), 2027. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042027
Inayat, M., Sulaiman, S. A., Kurnia, J. C., & Naz, M. Y. (2019). Catalytic and noncatalytic gasification of wood–coconut shell blend under different operating conditions. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 38(2), 688-698. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13003
Jaojaruek, K., Jarungthammachote, S., Gratuito, M. K. B., Wongsuwan, H., & Homhual, S. (2011). Experimental study of wood downdraft gasification for an improved producer gas quality through an innovative two-stage air and premixed air/gas supply approach. Bioresource Technology, 102(7), 4834-4840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.024
Jothiprakash, G., Balasubramaniam, P., Sundaram, S., & Ramesh, D. (2025). Catalytic biomass Ggasification for syngas production: Recent progress in tar reduction and future perspectives. Biomass, 5(3), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass5030037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass5030037
Kumar, S., & Pranav, P. K. (2018). Gasification prospective of compressed industrial tea (Camellia sinensis) waste using fixed bed downdraft gasifier. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 55(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2018551.1643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2018551.1643
Laca, A., Laca, A., & Díaz, M. (2017). Eggshell waste as catalyst: A review. Journal of Environmental Management,197, 351-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.088
Laghari, A. A., Jamro, I. A., Kumar, A., Chen, G., Sajnani, S., Guo, Z., ..., & Ma, W. (2024). Catalytic gasification of municipal solid waste using eggshell-derived CaO catalyst: an investigation of optimum H2 production, production distribution, and tar compounds. Next Sustainability, 4, 100038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxsust.2024.100038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxsust.2024.100038
Li, B., Wei, L., Yang, H., Wang, X., & Chen, H. (2014). The enhancing mechanism of calcium oxide on water gas shift reaction for hydrogen production. Energy, 68, 248-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.088
Li, B., Yang, H., Wei, L., Shao, J., Wang, X., & Chen, H. (2017). Absorption-enhanced steam gasification of biomass for hydrogen production: Effects of calcium-based absorbents and NiO-based catalysts on corn stalk pyrolysis-gasification. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(9), 5840-5848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.031
Li, Y., Wu, L., Xu, Q., & Li, Z. (2022). Hydrogen-rich gas production from sorption-enhanced sludge gasification using CaO-based biochar derived from crab shell as a CO2 sorbent. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 24(6), 2353-2364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-022-01480-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-022-01480-z
Lv, P., Yuan, Z., Wu, C., Ma, L., Chen, Y., & Tsubaki, N. (2007). Bio-syngas production from biomass catalytic gasification. Energy Conversion and Management, 48(4), 1132-1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2006.10.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2006.10.014
Mahallati, M. N. (2020). Advances in modeling saffron growth and development at different scales. In: A. Koocheki, &M, K.-Hosseini (Eds), Saffron (ch. 9, pp. 139-167). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818638-1.00009-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818638-1.00009-5
Mahishi, M. R., & Goswami, D. Y. (2007). An experimental study of hydrogen production by gasification of biomass in the presence of a CO2 sorbent. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32(14), 2803-2808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.03.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.03.030
Mandal, S., & Sahu, K. (2024). Performance of micro-scale gasifier based power generation unit using pigeonpea stalk pellets with mass and energy flow analyses. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 61(2), 286-298. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2024612.1843
Mignardi, S., Archilletti, L., Medeghini, L., & De Vito, C. (2020). Valorization of eggshell biowaste for sustainable environmental remediation. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 2436. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59324-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59324-5
Mojaver, P., Khalilarya, S., & Chitsaz, A. (2019). Multi-objective optimization using response surface methodology and exergy analysis of a novel integrated biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell and high-temperature sodium heat pipe system. Applied Thermal Engineering, 156, 627-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.04.104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.04.104
Oliveira, D. A., Benelli, P., & Amante, E. R. (2013). A literature review on adding value to solid residues: egg shells. Journal of Cleaner Production, 46, 42-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.045
Raheem, A., Liu, H., Ji, G., & Zhao, M. (2019). Gasification of lipid-extracted microalgae biomass promoted by waste eggshell as CaO catalyst. Algal Research, 42, 101601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2019.101601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2019.101601
Shahbaz, M., Al-Ansari, T., Inayat, M., Sulaiman, S. A., Parthasarathy, P., & McKay, G. (2020). A critical review on the influence of process parameters in catalytic co-gasification: current performance and challenges for a future prospectus. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 134, 110382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110382
Sulaiman, S. A., Roslan, R., Inayat, M., & Naz, M. Y. (2018). Effect of blending ratio and catalyst loading on co-gasification of wood chips and coconut waste. Journal of the Energy Institute, 91(5), 779-785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2017.05.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2017.05.003
Tangboriboon, N., Kunanuruksapong, R., & Sirivat, A. (2012). Preparation and properties of calcium oxide from eggshells via calcination. Materials Science - Poland, 30(4), 313-322. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13536-012-0055-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13536-012-0055-7
Taufiq‐Yap, Y. H., Wong, P., Marliza, T. S., Nurul Suziana, N. M., Tang, L. H., & Sivasangar, S. (2013). Hydrogen production from wood gasification promoted by waste eggshell catalyst. International Journal of Energy Research, 37(14), 1866-1871. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3003
Tripathy, B. K., Ramesh, G., Debnath, A., & Kumar, M. (2019). Mature landfill leachate treatment using sonolytic-persulfate/hydrogen peroxide oxidation: Optimization of process parameters. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 54, 210-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.01.036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.01.036
Tursun, Y., Wang, K., Yi, R., Abduhani, H., Dai, Z., Zhong, M., ..., & Liu, Y. (2024). Catalytic pyrolysis of naomaohu coal using combined CaO and Ni/Olivine catalysts for simultaneously improving the tar and gas quality. Energies, 17(7), 1613. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17071613 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17071613
Tursun, Y., Xu, S., Abulikemu, A., & Dilinuer, T. (2019). Biomass gasification for hydrogen rich gas in a decoupled triple bed gasifier with olivine and NiO/olivine. Bioresource Technology, 272, 241-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.008
Udomsirichakorn, J., Basu, P., Salam, P. A., & Acharya, B. (2013). Effect of CaO on tar reforming to hydrogen-enriched gas with in-process CO2 capture in a bubbling fluidized bed biomass steam gasifier. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(34), 14495-14504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.055
Van Soest, P. V., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10), 3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
van de Kamp, W. L., de Wild, P. J., Knoef, H. A. M., Neeft, J. P. A., & Kiel, J. H. A. (2006). Tar measurement in biomass gasification, standardisation and supporting R&D. ECN-C--06-046, Research Centre of the Netherlands.
Waheed, M., Yousaf, M., Shehzad, A., Inam-Ur-Raheem, M., Khan, M. K. I., Khan, M. R., Ahmad, N., & Aadil, R. M. (2020). Channelling eggshell waste to valuable and utilizable products: a comprehensive review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 106, 78-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.10.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.10.009
Wei, Z., Xu, C., & Li, B. (2009). Application of waste eggshell as low-cost solid catalyst for biodiesel production. Bioresource Technology, 100(11), 2883-2885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.039
Yahaya, A. Z., Somalu, M. R., Muchtar, A., Sulaiman, S. A., & Daud, W. R. W. (2019). Effect of particle size and temperature on gasification performance of coconut and palm kernel shells in downdraft fixed-bed reactor. Energy, 175, 931-940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.138
Yetilmezsoy, K., Demirel, S., & Vanderbei, R. J. (2009). Response surface modeling of Pb (II) removal from aqueous solution by Pistacia vera L.: Box–Behnken experimental design. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 171(1-3), 551-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.035
Zamboni, I., Debal, M., Matt, M., Girods, P., Kiennemann, A., Rogaume, Y., & Courson, C. (2016). Catalytic gasification of biomass (Miscanthus) enhanced by CO2 sorption. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(22), 22253-22266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6444-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6444-4
Zhang, G., Liu, H., Wang, J., & Wu, B. (2018). Catalytic gasification characteristics of rice husk with calcined dolomite. Energy, 165, 1173-1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.030
Zhou, L., Yang, Z., Tang, A., Huang, H., Wei, D., Yu, E., & Lu, W. (2019). Steam-gasification of biomass with CaO as catalyst for hydrogen-rich syngas production. Journal of the Energy Institute, 92(6), 1641-1646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2019.01.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2019.01.010
