Ergonomic Evaluation of Hand Tools Injuries among Indian Farmers

Authors

  • Adarsh Kumar Division of Agricultural Engineering, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, India Author
  • J. K. Singh Division of Agricultural Engineering, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, India Author
  • Dinesh Mohan Transportation Research & Injury Prevention Programme, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi -110016, India Author
  • Mathew Varghese Department of Orthopaedics, St. Stephen's Hospital, Delhi, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2006434.1227

Abstract

There are 800 million hand tools used on Indian farms by 260 million farm workers. This study was done in survey of two phases. In the first phase, data on agricultural related injuries was collected from nine contiguous villages in a total population of 19,723 persons. In the second phase of study 21 more villages were added and population covered in was 78,890. A total of576 and 282 agricultural injuries were reported in Phase-I and Phase-II respectively. Hand tools accounted for 332 (58%) and 54 (19%) of total agricultural injuries in the two phases of survey respectively. Most of the injuries i.e. 98% and 91% of the hand tool injuries caused were AIS I (45% and 17% of the total AIS I injuries) in Phase I and II. 70% of AIS I hand tool injuries had a recovery time of more than 7 days in Phase I. In phase II, all AIS I injuries took more than 7 days to recover. The mechanism of injuries was slippage of tool from hand or hitting a hard surface in impact type soil interactive tools (spade). The foot and legs were the body part injured most frequently in these tools. In case of harvesting tools (sickle), amputations of fingers and in weeding fork abrasions on under side of little finger because of ground contact were common injuries. In case of axe and sugar cane cutter injuries, higher severity injuries were sustained on upper extremities. There are 1700 injuries related to hand tools per hundred thousand farm workers per year in rural India. Productivity is impaired to the tune of24,000 days per hundred thousand population because of injuries caused by hand tools on farms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ayoub M M; Purswell J; Hoag L.1975. Research requirement on hand tools. NIOSH Technical Report, The University of Oklahoma.

Census of India. Series I, Paper-2 of 200 I. Regional General and Census Commissioner, India. 2001.

Gite L P; Yadav B G. 1989. Anthropometric Survey for Agricultural Machinery Design: An Indian case study. Applied Ergonomics 20,191-196.

Gordon J E; Gulari P V; Wayon J B. 1962. Traumatic accidents in rural tropical regions: An epidemiological field study in Punjab, India. American 1. Medical Scl, 243, 158-178.

Mohan D; Patel R. 1992. Design of safer agricultural equipment: Application of ergonomics and epidemiology. Int. J. Industrial Ergonomics, 10, 301-309.

Parekh M. 1980. Hand tools for small and marginal farmers. Paper presented at XVII Annual Convention of Indian Society of Agricultural Engineers, New Delhi, India.

Singh G. 1997. Data Book on mechanization and agro-processing since independence. Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal, India.

The Abbreviated Injury Scale. 1990. American Association for Automotive Medicine, Arlington Heights, IL.

Tiwari P S; Gite L P; Dubey A K; Kot L S. 2002. Agricultural injuries in Central India: nature, magnitude, and economic impact. J, Agric. Safety Health, 8, 95-111.

Published

2006-12-29

Issue

Section

Regular Issue

How to Cite

Adarsh Kumar, J. K. Singh, Dinesh Mohan, & Mathew Varghese. (2006). Ergonomic Evaluation of Hand Tools Injuries among Indian Farmers. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 43(4), 104-113. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2006434.1227