Ergonomic Refinement of Manual Multi-Row Seed Planter from Pull to Push Type: A Postural and Physiological Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2026631.1984Keywords:
energy expenditure, farm mechanization, human-centric design, musculoskeletal disorders, physiological cost, posture analysis, REBAAbstract
Manual multi-row seed planters are commonly used by marginal farmers, but amongst them, pull-type models often cause operator discomfort and reduced efficiency, mainly due to the single handle and backward movement. This study aimed to redesign and improve the seed planter into a push-type configuration and evaluate its effects on operator physiology, posture, and field performance. The push-type planter was improved using anthropometric data and ergonomic guidelines to eliminate the need for walking backward, minimise physical strain, and enhance handling efficiency. The push-type design maintained moderate work severity, whereas the pull-type exceeded ergonomic thresholds with moderate to heavy severity. Physiological workload (heart rate and energy expenditure) and postural risk were evaluated in twelve farm workers (n = 12) to ergonomically refine a conventional manual multi-row seed planter from a pull-type to a push-type configuration. The participants represented a typical adult farming population, with ages ranging from 23 to 54 years and diverse body dimensions relevant to manual planter operation. Lower mean heart rate (108 vs. 117 beats min-1), decreased energy expenditure (15.0 vs. 17.0 kJ min-1), and improved posture based on Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) scores (6.4 vs. 8.3) were observed with the improved push-type design vs. the existing pull-type design. Forward-facing operation and improved balance enhance user control and safety, reducing the risk of slips or falls, unlike backward movement in pull-type models. Additionally, the push-type planter achieved better field performance, with a higher capacity (0.088 ha h-1) and reduced labour requirement (11 man-h ha-1) compared to the pull-type. Overall, the ergonomic transformation to a push-type design led to significant improvements in comfort, safety, and efficiency, contributing a more sustainable and inclusive solution for small-scale farm mechanization.
Downloads
References
Agrawal, K. N., Singh, R. K. P., & Satapathy, K. K. (2009). Isometric strength of agricultural workers of Meghalaya: A case study of an Indian population. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(6), 919–923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2009.06.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2009.06.008
Agrawal, K. N., Tiwari, P. S., Gite, L. P., & Bhushanababu, V. (2010). Isometric push/pull strength of agricultural workers of Central India. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 12(1), 115-124.
BIS. (2022). IS 9164:1979 – Guide for estimating cost of farm machinery operation. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi.
Dixit, J., & Namgiyal, D. (2012). Anthropometry of farm workers of Kashmir region of India for equipment design. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 49(2), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2012492.1472 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2012492.1472
Dixit, J., Khan, J. N., & Shukla, R. M. (2010). Mechanization possibilities of maize cultivation in hilly regions of Jammu and Kashmir state of India. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa & Latin America, 41(3), 59-63.
Garg, I. K., & Dixit A. (2003). Development and evaluation of manually operated garlic planter. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa & Latin America, 34(2), 19–22.
Gite, L. P., & Yadav, B. G. (1990). Optimum handle height for a push–pull type manually operated dryland weeder. Ergonomics, 33(12), 1487-1494. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139008925348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139008925348
Gite, L. P., Agarwal, K., Mehta, C. R., Potdar, R., & Narwariya, B. (2019). Handbook of Ergonomical Design of Agricultural Tools, Equipment and Workplaces. Jain Brothers, New Delhi.
Gite, L. P., Majumder, J., Mehta, C. R., & Khadatkar, A. (2009). Anthropometric and strength data of Indian agricultural workers for farm equipment design. Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal, India.
Hignett, S., & McAtamney, L. (2000). Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). Applied Ergonomics, 31(2), 201–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00039-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00039-3
Ikechukwu, I. B., Gbabo, A., & Ugwuoke, I. C. (2014). Design and fabrication of a single row maize planter for garden use. Journal of Advancement in Engineering and Technology, 1(2), 1-7.
Jeong, S. O., & Kook, J. (2023). CREBAS: Computer-based REBA evaluation system for wood manufacturers using MediaPipe. Applied Sciences, 13(2), 938. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13020938 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13020938
Kankal, U. S., Karale, D. S., Khanbalkar, V. P., & Thakare, S. H. (2016). Performance evaluation of single row manual cotton planter. International Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 9(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJAE/9.1/19-26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJAE/9.1/19-26
Khan, K., Moses, S. C., & Kumar, A. (2015). Design and fabrication of a manually operated single row multi-crop planter. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science, 8(10), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.9790/2380-08102147158
Kumari, S., Tewari, V. K., & Kumar, S. (2022). Assessment of physiological characteristics and effect of load on agricultural workers during cranking operation. Pantnagar Journal of Research, 20(2), 328-334.
Lohan, S. K., Chhuneja, N. K., Kumar, S., Gautam, A., & Yousuf, A. (2025). Safety in agriculture for reducing health hazards: Analysing prevalence and prevention strategies. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 62(3), 592–607. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2025623.1947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2025623.1947
Lohan, S. K., Narang, M. K., Singh, A., & Dixit, A. K. (2024). Design, development and ergonomic evaluation of a manual cutter for mat-type paddy nursery based on a human-centered approach. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 80(3), 1122–1136. https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815241287681 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815241287681
Lohan, S. K., Singh, P., & Kumar, S. (2022). Agricultural work-related fatalities and injuries in Punjab (India). Injury Prevention, 28, 459-464. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2022-044566 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2022-044566
Meena, B. S., Shrivastava, A. K., & Dubey, R. K. (2020). Development and evaluation of manual operated two-row planter for onion seeds. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 39(48), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.9734/CJAST/2020/v39i4831212 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2020/v39i4831212
Nag, P. K., & Gite, L. P. (2020a). Energy cost of human labour in farming. In: Human-centered agriculture. Design science and innovation (pp 61–89). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7269-2_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7269-2_4
Nag, P. K., & Gite, L. P. (2020b). Ergo-design criteria for farm tools and machinery. In: Human-centered agriculture. Design science and innovation (pp. 199–220). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7269-2_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7269-2_11
Nag, P. K., & Nag, A. (2004) Drudgery, accidents and injuries in Indian agriculture. Industrial Health, 42(2), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.42.149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.42.149
Nag. P. K., Sebastian. N. C., & Mavlankar. M. G. (1980). Occupational workload of Indian agricultural workers. Ergonomics, 23(2), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138008924724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138008924724
Shambhu, V. B. (2020). Design and development of low-cost multi-row manual jute seed drill. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America, 51(2), 79–85.
Singh, S. P., Gite, L. P., & Agarwal, N. (2006). Ergonomical assessment of manually operated seed drills for farm women. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 43(1), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2006431.1157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2006431.1157
Sinha, J., Singh, J. K., & Kumar, A. (2018). Ergonomic assessment of wheel hoe and design compliance for women farm workers. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 88(3), 409–414. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i3.78528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i3.78528
Varghese, M. A., Saha, P. N., & Atreya, N. (1994). A rapid appraisal of occupational workload from a modified scale of perceived exertion. Ergonomics, 37(3), 485–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139408963665 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139408963665
Yadav, R., & Pund, S. (2007). Development and ergonomic evaluation of manual weeder. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 9, 1–9.
Yadav, R., Gite L. P., Kaur. N., & Randhawa. J. (2000). Anthropometry of Indian female agricultural workers. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America, 31(3), 55–60.
