Comparative Performance of Some Bullock Drawn Puddlers

Authors

  • Atul Kumar Shrivastava Associate Professor, Dept. of Farm Machinery and Power, College of Agril. Engg., JNKVV, Jabalpur, (M.P.), Indiav Author
  • R.K. Datta Retd. Professor, A-26, I.I.T. Campus, I.I.T., Kharagpur, W.B., India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2005424.1142

Abstract

Four different bullock drawn puddlers were tested under wet sandy clay loam soil conditions and the comparative performance was evaluated from mechanical, ergonomical and economical aspects. From the results it was found that the improved rotary puddler gave better performance than others tested. The puddling index, draft requirement, vibration level and energy expenditure rate were 67.9%, 42.3 kg, 0.910 RMS/acc. mls2 and 5.02 k cal/min respectively. The work load was graded as moderately heavy. The cost of operation for two passes was calculated to be Rs.224.00/ha.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Awadhwal N K; and Singh C P. 1985. Dynamic behavior of wet soil and tillage and traction in wet land. Agric. Mech. Asia, Africa and Latin America., 16(2), 11-20.

Christensen E H. 1959. Physiological evaluation of work in the Nykroppa iron works in N.F. Floyd and A.T. Walf,.'t. Ergonomics Soc. Symposium on fatigue, Lewis, London.

De Datta, S K 1981. Principles and practices of rice production. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Gee-Clough D; Salokhe V M. 1989. Limitations of technology adoption by small farmers. Agric. Engg. Today, 13 (1 & 2), 41-47.

Kisu M. 1978. Properties of wet soils. Soils and Rice, Int. Rice Res. Inst. Los Banos,Philippines. Naphade J D; Ghildyal B P. 1971. Effect of puddling on physical properties of rice soils. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 41, 1065-1067.

Pandey K P; Ojha T P. 1973. Effect of lug angle on tractive performance of a rigid wheel in puddled soil. Harvester, 15(1),29-33.

Parihar S S; Khera K K1976. Effect of puddling with different implements on the water losses. J. Res. Punjab Agric. Univ., Ludhiana, 13,249-254.

Rao P V N; Sirohi B S. 1975. Comparative study of improved puddlers. J. Agril. Engg. 12 (3-4), 21-23.

Rautray S K 1993. Performance evaluation of animal drawn puddlers in black soils. Paper presented at 28th annual convention of ISAE held at ClAE, Bhopal, India.

Sharma D N; Jain M L; Premi S C L. 1991. Field performance evaluation of bullock drawn puddler. Agri!. Mech. Asia, Africa and Latin America, 22(1), 29-33.

Sharma I S R P; Singh B. 1984. Performance analysis ofbullock drawn rotary puddlers. J. Agri!. Engg, 21 (4), 18-22.

Sharma P K; De Datta S K. 1985. Puddling influence on soil rice development and yield. Soil Sci. Am. J., 49, 1452-1457.

ShrivastavaAK 1995. Some investigation on an animal drawn rotary puddler from mechanical and ergonomic considerations. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Agril. & Food Engg, Dept, IIT, Kharagpur, India.

Singh K N; Singh B. 1973. Performance studies of various puddling equipment. J. Agril. Engg, 10, (5-6), 06-09.

Zander J. 1973. Principles of Ergonomics. Agri!. Univ., Wagenigen. The Netherlands.

Published

2005-12-31

Issue

Section

Regular Issue

How to Cite

Atul Kumar Shrivastava, & R.K. Datta. (2005). Comparative Performance of Some Bullock Drawn Puddlers. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 42(4), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2005424.1142