Evaluation of Hydraulic Conductivity in Upper Krishna Project Command Area of Karnataka

Authors

  • P Balakrishnan Professor and Head, Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Bijapur-586101 Author
  • MS Shirahatti Professor and Head, Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Bijapur-586101 Author
  • Girish B Deshpande M. Tech. Student, College of Agricultural Engineering, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Raichur-584 101 Author
  • RD Barker Research Associate, College of Agricultural Engineering, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Raichur-584 101 Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2005422.1124

Abstract

The study area consists of black soils (Vertisols) with high clay content underlain by bedded limestone located in canal seepage affected zone in Upper Krishna Project command area, Karnataka. In situ measurements on grid basis in the Operational Research Project (ORP) area (180 ha) and aerial estimates using q-h relationships of pipe drains in Phase-I area (14.9 ha) of the above project were obtained and compared. The point K-values varied from 0.004 to 0.559 mid and followed the log normal distribution. The geometric mean (OM) values of K of the ORP and the Phase-I areas were 0.077 and 0.070 mid respectively. The K-contour map was drawn and the vertical as well as radial K values were also computed. The OM areal K values for the entire strata (Ko) and the layer below the drains only (Kb ) ranged from 1.114 to 1.449 mid and from 1.145 to 1.348 mid at 90 per cent confidence limits respectively, indicating that the flow below the drain level was pre-dominant. This observation of much larger areal K-values in comparison with the point measurements as explained by higher discharge was in line with the reported literature and also found to have more practical applicability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bentley WJ; Skaggs RW; Parsons JE 1989. The effect of variation in hydraulic conductivity on water table drawdown. Technical Bulletin, North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, North Carolina State University, 288, Raleigh, 23 p.

Bouwer H; Jackson RD 1974. Determining soil properties. In: J. van Schilfgaarde (00.) Drainage for Agriculture. Agronomy 17, Amer. Soc. of Agron., Madison, pp. 611-672.

Dieleman·PJ; Trafford OD. 1976. Drainage Testing; Irrigation and Drainage Paper 28, FAO, Rome, 172 El-Mowelhi NM; van Schilfgaarde J 1982. Computation of soil hydrological constants from field drainage experiments in some soils in Egypt. Trans. ASAE: 77-79.

ErnstLF 1950. Een nieuwe formula voor het berekenen van de doorlaatfactor met de boorgatenmethode. Rapport land bouw proefstationen Bodemkundig Institute, TNO, Groningen (in Dutch).

Hoffman OJ; SchwabGO 1964. Tile spacing prediction based on drain outflow. Trans. ASAE 7: 444-447.

Holsambre DO; Varade SB; Acharaya HS; Rapte SK.1982 Drainage characteristics of Vertisols. J. of Indian Soc. of Soil Sci., 30 (2) 116-121.

Hooghoudt SB 1936. Bijdragen tot de kennis van enige natuurkundige grootheden van de grond. Verslagen Landbouwkundig Onderzoek 42 (13) B : 449-541.

Kirkham D; van BavelCHM 1948. Theory of seepage into augerholes. Proc. of the Soil Sci. Soc. Of Amer. 13 : 75-81.

Oosterbaan RJ; Nijland HJ 1994. Determining the saturated hydraulic conductivity. In Ritzema, H.P. (00.). Drainage Principles and Applications, Int. Inst. for Land Reclamation and Improvement, Wageningen, The Netheilands. pp. 435-476.

Suryawanshi SN; Sawant MM; Pampattiwar PS 1991. Evaluation of subsurface drainage system in black soils. Irrig. and Drain. Abs. 17 (1) : 48.

Talsma T; Hoskew HC 1959. Investigation on water table response to tile drains in comparison with theory. .'J. of Oeophy. Trans. 64 : 1933-1944.

Published

2005-06-30

Issue

Section

Regular Issue

How to Cite

P Balakrishnan, MS Shirahatti, Girish B Deshpande, & RD Barker. (2005). Evaluation of Hydraulic Conductivity in Upper Krishna Project Command Area of Karnataka. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 42(2), 42-45. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2005422.1124