Laser Leveling- A tool to increase irrigation efficiency at field level
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2004411.1064Abstract
High irrigation efficiencies may be achieved if water is delivered uniformly across the field. Topography index (TI) was used to assest the smoothness of the land surface of the selected farmers fields of village Masauta, district Ghaziabad, V.P. during 2002-03. No direct relationship was found between TI and field size, however, earthwork requirement per unit area, for laser leveling was found increasing with increasing field sizes (least for small farmers, and highest in case of large farmers). Application, storage and distribution efficiencies showed a decreasing trend with' increasing values of TI. Laser leveling improved all the three efficiencies (application, storage and distribution) in all the cases; however, the percent enhancement of irrigation efficiencies was found to be higher at higher values of Tl. After laser leveling, application, storage and distribution efficiencies increased from 58.85 to 64.4%, 50.6% to 69.5% and 70.3% to 81.5% in the field having TI of 5.8 cm whereas these increased from 32.2% to 67.15 %,30.0% to 66.7% and 38.9% to 78.5% in the field with TI of 26 cm, respectively. Laser leveling increased wheat yields, the increase in yield was however more significant in fields with high TI values, before leveling. (14.6 % increase from the field having TI as 5.8 cm but 32.2 % increase in case of the field having TI of 26 cm).
Downloads
References
Agarwal, M.C. and Goel, A.C. 1981. Effect of field leveling quality on irrigation efficiency and crop yield. Agricultural Water Management, 4: 457-464.
Houston, e. F. 1966. Trends and costs of land grading for irrigation in California. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng.,9(4}: 565-567.
Johnson, S.H.; Khan, Z.S. and Hussain, Ch. M. 1978. The economics of precision land leveling: a case study from Pakistan. Agric. Water Management. 1: 319-331.
Khepar. S.D.; Chaturvedi, M.e. and Sinha, 8.K. 1982. Effect of precision land levelling on increase in crop yield & yields economic decision. J. Agri. Engg. 19(4): 23-29.
Mal, 8.S. 1968. Farm management for irrigation practices. Proc. Seventh NESA Irrigation Practices Seminar, Lahore, Pakistan: 16-18.
Michael, A.M. 1978. Irrigation theory and practice, Vikas Publishing House, New Delhi, 801p.
Patel, Neelam and Rajput, T.8.$. 2000. Peoples Participation for Identification of Problem for Watershed Development, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 45 (1&2): 72-79.
Patel, Neelam and Rajput, T.8.S. 2001. Participatory rural appraisal in watershed management -A case study. Indian 1. Soil Cons. 29(2): 152-157.
Rajput, T.B.S. and Patel, Neelam. 2002 a. Understanding ways and means to enhanced water use efficiency through Participatory Rural Appraisal, National Seminar on Sustainable management of Water Resources for enhanced agricultural Production, organized by ISWM at Dapo1l, MS, October 26-28.
Rajput, T.B.S. and Patel, Neelam. 2002b. Determination of status of use of irrigation equipments on farmers' field through participatory rural appraisal techniques. Proceedings of 2nd International Agronomy Congress, Nov. 26-30, 2002, New Delhi, Vol. 2, PP·1470-1471.
Rege, N.D. 1972. Soil and water management problems in India. Indian farming, 22(2): 1217.
Soil Conservation Service. 1970. National Engineering Handbook, Section 15, Chapter 12 Land Leveling, U.S.D.A., Washington.
Tyagi, N.K. and Singh, O.P. 1979. Investigation on effect of soil moisture on performance of land leveling implements. J. Agric. Engg. 16(2): 67-72.
