Performance and Economic Evaluation of a Tractor-Operated Deep Furrow Sugarcane Cutter Planter in Haryana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2026632.2017Keywords:
bud emergence, deep furrow planting, mechanized agriculture, payback periodAbstract
Sugarcane planting in India is highly labour-intensive and costly, and there is limited field-based evaluation of mechanized cutter planters under diverse agro-climatic conditions. A tractor-operated deep furrow sugarcane cutter planter was evaluated under field conditions at three locations in Haryana using three sugarcane varieties (CoJ 85, COH 119, and CO 118). The machine performs multiple operations in a single pass, such as, opening deep furrows, cutting whole cane stalks into setts, placing them in deep furrows, applying fertilizers and chemicals, and covering with soil. Trials were conducted on sandy loam to loamy sand soils with 11.8% to 13.1% moisture content. The planter achieved sett overlaps between 71 to 81 mm, with over 83% of setts placed within the desirable overlap range, and minimal bud damage (2.78% to 2.93%). It maintained consistent performance across sites, with field capacity of 0.19 to 0.21 ha h-1, field efficiency up to 60.6%, and fuel consumption between 24.05 to 25.89 L ha-1. Labour requirement was drastically reduced to ~20 man-hours ha-1, compared to 210 man-hours ha-1 under conventional planting, translating to over 90% labour savings. Operational costs were reduced by 61%, and mean bud emergence after 45 days was higher in mechanized planting (44.7%) than in the conventional method (39.2%). The sugarcane cutter planter demonstrated a break-even point of 95.73 h year-1, a payback period of 0.99 years, and a benefit- cost ratio of 1.38, indicating it as a cost-effective and profitable option for both individual use and custom hiring. The results indicate that the cutter planter ensures uniform sett placement, reduces labour dependency, and improves planting efficiency. Its ability to handle whole cane stalks and integrate multiple operations makes it a promising solution for large-scale, cost-effective, and timely sugarcane planting under diverse field conditions.
Downloads
References
Agarwal, D., Chahal, P. K., Ghanghas, B. S., & Shubham. (2024). Analysis of constraints faced by sugarcane growers in Haryana, India. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 42(5), 443–448. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2024/v42i52456 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2024/v42i52456
BIS. (1973). IS: 2720 Part II: Method of test for soils: Part II : Determination of water content. Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, New Delhi.
BIS. (1975). IS: 2720 Part 29: Method of test for soils, Part 29: Determination of dry density of soils in-place by the core-cutter method. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
BIS. (1979). IS: 9164: Guide for estimating cost of farm machinery operation. Reaffirmed 2007. Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, New Delhi.
Choudhary, S., Jain, M., Upadhyay, G., Sihag, N., Patel, B., & Rani, V. (2026). A mechatronic controlled seed metering mechanism for precision intercropping. Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 51(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42853-025-00286-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42853-025-00286-9
Choudhary, S., Upadhyay, G., Patel, B., Naresh, & Jain, M. (2021). Energy requirements and tillage performance under different active tillage treatments in Sandy Loam soil. Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 46(4), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42853-021-00112-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42853-021-00112-y
FAOSTAT. (2024). Sugar cane production in 2022. UN Food and Agriculture Organization, Corporate Statistical Database. Available at: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (accessed on 06 May 2026).
GoI. (2023). Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2023. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Department of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Directorate of Economics, Statistics & Evaluation Division, New Delhi.
Hensh, S., Raheman, H., Upadhyay, G., & Bera, S. (2024). Comparative analysis of a remotely-controlled wetland paddy seeder and conventional drum seeder. Sadhana, 49(4), 260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-024-02604-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-024-02604-x
Hunt, D. (2001). Farm Power and Machinery Management (10th ed). Iowa State Press, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Jittabut, P. (2015). Physical and thermal properties of briquette fuels from rice straw and sugarcane leaves by mixing molasses. Energy Procedia, 79, 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.452 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.452
Kumar, N., Chaudhary, A., Ahlawat, O. P., Naorem, A., Upadhyay, G., Chhokar, R. S., Gill, S. C., Khippal, A., Tripathi, S.C., & Singh, G. P. (2023). Crop residue management challenges, opportunities and way forward for sustainable food-energy security in India: A review. Soil and Tillage Research, 228, 105641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2023.105641 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2023.105641
Kumar, S., Pal, S., Khandai, S., Kumar, M., & Tripathi, A. (2017). Performance evaluation of sugar cane cutter planter using different parameters. International Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 10(2), 367-373. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJAE/10.2/367-373 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJAE/10.2/367-373
Kumawat, L., Raheman, H., Upadhyay, G., & Somra, A. (2025). Evaluation of a power tiller operated de-topper-cum-digger for onion crop harvesting. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 62(4), 883-893. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2025624.1975 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2025624.1975
Liu, F., Li, Z., Cai, W. W., & Wu, W. (2024). Effects of planting density and depth on sugarcane yield and lodging resistance. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crop Science, 45(2), 330-339. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2024.02.013
Mandal, S. K., & Maji, P. K. (2008). Design refinement of 2 row tractor mounted sugarcane cutter planter. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 10, 1-8. https://cigrjournal.org/index.php/Ejounral/article/viewFile/1014/1007
Nakashima, G. T., Martins, M. P., Hansted, A. L. S., Yamamoto, H., & Yamaji, F. M. (2017). Sugarcane trash for energy purposes: Storage time and particle size can improve the quality of biomass for fuel? Industrial Crops and Products, 108, 641–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.07.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.07.017
Nataraj, E., Sarkar, P., Raheman, H., & Upadhyay, G. (2021). Embedded digital display and warning system of velocity ratio and wheel slip for tractor operated active tillage implements. Journal of Terramechanics, 97, 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2021.06.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2021.06.003
Nisha., Malik, D. P., Kundu, K. K., Bhatia, J. K., & Ritu. (2022). Economic efficiency of resource use in sugarcane production in Haryana. Economic Affairs, 67(03), 251-255. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.3.2022.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.3.2022.14
Patel, D., Gamit, P., & Jadav, K. S. (2019). Performance and status of agro-based industry in India: A review. In S. S. Kalamkar, & H. Sharma (Eds.), Emerging Global Economic Situation: Impact on Trade and Agribusiness in India (pp. 409). Allied Publishers, New Delhi.
Patil, A., Dave, A. K., & Yadav, R. N. S. (2004). Evaluation of sugarcane cutter planter. Sugar Tech, 6(3), 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02942713 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02942713
Rahaman, S., Babu, B. H., Kumar, A. A., Reddy, K. M., & Rao, V. S. (2024). Economic analysis and feasibility of tractor operated pulse crop harvester. Economic Affairs, 69(1), 509-516. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.2.2024.39 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.2.2024.39
Ram, B., Karuppaiyan, R., & Pandey, S. K. (2011). Sugarcane cultivation in sub-tropical India-farmer's guide. Extension Bulletin No. SBIRCKNL01/2011. Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Regional Centre, Karnal, Haryana.
Ranjan, R., Kumar, P., & Kumar, A. (2016). Performance evaluation of tractor operated two row sugarcane cutter planter. Progressive Research–An International Journal Society for Scientific Development, 11(2), 191-195.
Rasool, S., Raheman, H., & Upadhyay, G. (2017). Development of an instrumentation system for evaluating the tractive performance of walking tractors. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(10), 759–770. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.610.092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.610.092
Shivagami, G., & Prasad, T. R. (2020). Performance of agro-based industries in India with special reference to sugar industry - An assessment. Shanlax International Journal of Economics, 8(2), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.34293/economics.v8i2.2063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34293/economics.v8i2.2063
Singh, A. K., & Sharma, M. P. (2008). IISR sugarcane cutter - planter. Operation Manual No. AE/08/01. ICAR-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research (IISR), Lucknow. 6 pp
Singh, A. K., & Singh, P. R. (2016). Development of a tractor operated sugarcane cutter planter for mechanisation of sugarcane planting in deep furrows. Sugar Tech, 19(4), 416–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-016-0471-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-016-0471-9
Singh, J., Singh, A. K., Sharma, M. P., Singh, P. R., & Srivastava, A. C. (2011). Mechanization of sugarcane cultivation in India. Sugar Tech, 13(4), 310–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-011-0101-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-011-0101-5
Singh, P. R., Singh, S., & Gupta, R. (2013). Mechanization of sugarcane cultivation-problems and prospects. Paper presented in 72nd Annual Convention of Sugar Technologists' Association of India (STAI) held at Lucknow on Sept. 26-28, 2013.
Singh, R. S., Singh, K., & Dubey, A. (2014). Custom hiring business model and decision support system of agricultural machinery. Agricultural Engineering Today, 38(4), 31-36.
Singh, S., Singh, P. R., Singh, A. K., & Gupta, R. (2016). Present status and future need of mechanizing sugarcane cultivation in India. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia Africa and Latin America, 47(1), 75–81.
Singh, S., Singh, P. R., Singh, A.K., & Gupta, R. (2017). Comparative performance evaluation of sugarcane cutter planters. Agricultural Engineering Today, 41(3), 16-20.
Smith, D. W., Sims, B. G., & O’Neill, D. H. (1994). Testing and evaluation of agricultural machinery and equipment: Principles and practice. FAO Agricultural Service Bulletin 110. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 272 pp.
Sreedevi, P., & Rao, P. V. K. J. (2018). Performance of tractor operated two row sugarcane cutter planter for sugarcane planting in Andhra Pradesh State, India. International Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 11(2), 353–358. https://doi.org/10.15740/has/ijae/11.2/353-358 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJAE/11.2/353-358
Srivastava, A. K., Goering, C. E., Rohrbach, R. P., & Buckmaster, D. R. (2006). Engineering principles of agricultural machines. (2nd ed.). American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI, USA. https://doi.org/10.13031/epam.2013
Voora, V., Bermúdez, S., Le, H., Larrea, C., & Luna, E. (2023). Global Market Report: Sugar cane prices and sustainability. Available at: https://www.iisd.org/publications/report/2023-global-market-report-sugar-cane (accessed on 06 May 2026).
Yadav, R., Kavad, A., Jakasania, R., & Nimesh, P. (2020). Sugarcane planting technology in India. Journal of Ergonomics, 10, 270.
Zhang, B., Yang, X., & Zhu, Y. (2024). Design and simulation of a combined trencher for transverse sugarcane planter. Agriculture, 14(8), 1416. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14081416 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14081416
