Investigation on Temperature Phased Anaerobic Digestion (TPAD) of Dairy Industrial Fat-Rich Sludge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2026632.2004Keywords:
biogas production, mesophilic digestion, methane yield, thermophilic digestion, two-phase digestionAbstract
In the present investigation, a Temperature-Phased Anaerobic Digestion (TPAD) system was evaluated for treating dairy industry fat-rich waste sludge. Results showed that both biogas yield and methane content were higher than those obtained from a conventional anaerobic digester. The configuration of two reactors in series, with the thermophilic unit as the initial stage, succeeded by the mesophilic unit, was optimized for both thermophilic and mesophilic conditions. The second mesophilic stage finalizes the digestion process, transforming partially digested organics into methane and carbon dioxide, so totally recovering the energy by-product from dairy waste sludge. The pH value in the TPAD varied from 6.91 to 7.51. The maximum volatile solids (VS) removal efficiency of 39.6% achieved in the TPAD system as the thermophilic operation time was maintained initially for 10 days during the start-up of the batch TPAD experiment. The methane production increased from 220 to 435 ml of CH4 g-1 of VS, and the methane content varied from 51.9% to 62.4%. This value exceeded the yields attained by the conventional anaerobic digester at solids retention time (SRT) of 35 days obtained as 357 ml of CH4 g-1 of VS with 58.1% methane content. Using the TPAD technique, anaerobic digestion of dairy industrial waste sludge effectively recovered the energy as methane. As a result, in comparison to traditional anaerobic systems, the TPAD system allowed higher methane outputs and superior operational performance.
Downloads
References
Ahn, J. H., & Forster, C. F. (2002). A comparison of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic upflow filters treating paper–pulp–liquors. Process Biochemistry, 38(2), 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00088-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00088-2
Alonso, R. M., del Río, R., & García, M. P. (2016). Thermophilic and mesophilic temperature phase anaerobic co-digestion (TPAcD) compared with single-stage co-digestion of sewage sludge and sugar beet pulp lixiviation. Biomass and Bioenergy, 93, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.05.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.05.028
Amodeo, C., Hattou, S., Buffiere, P., & Benbelkacem, H. (2021). Temperature phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) of organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) and digested sludge (DS): Effect of different hydrolysis conditions. Waste Management, 126, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.02.049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.02.049
Appels, L., Baeyens, J., Degrève, J., & Dewil, R. (2008). Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 34(6), 755–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2008.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2008.06.002
Baird, R. B., Rice, E. W., & Eaton, A. D. (Eds.). (2017). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (23rd ed.). American Public Health Association (APHA), Washington, DC.
Bouallagui, H., Haouari, O., Touhami, Y., Ben Cheikh, R., Marouani, L., & Hamdi, M. (2004). Effect of temperature on the performance of an anaerobic tubular reactor treating fruit and vegetable waste. Process Biochemistry, 39(12), 2143–2148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2003.11.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2003.11.022
Bougrier, C., Delgenès, J. P., & Carrère, H. (2008). Effects of thermal treatments on waste activated sludge samples solubilisation, physical properties and anaerobic digestion. Chemical Engineering Journal, 139(2), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.07.099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.07.099
Chatterjee, B., & Mazumder, D. (2019). Role of stage-separation in the ubiquitous development of anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste: A critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 104, 439–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.026
Feng, K., Wang, Q., Li, H., Zhang, Y., Deng, Z., Liu, J., & Du, X. (2020). Effect of fermentation type regulation using alkaline addition on two-phase anaerobic digestion of food waste at different organic load rates. Renewable Energy, 154, 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.051
Ferrer, I., Vázquez, F., & Font, X. (2010). Long-term operation of a thermophilic anaerobic reactor: Process stability and efficiency at decreasing sludge retention time. Bioresource Technology, 101(9), 2972–2980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.006
Ge, H., Jensen, P. D., & Batstone, D. J. (2010). Pre-treatment mechanisms during thermophilic–mesophilic temperature-phased anaerobic digestion of primary sludge. Water Research, 44(1), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.005
Ge, H., Jensen, P. D., & Batstone, D. J. (2011). Temperature-phased anaerobic digestion increases apparent hydrolysis rate for waste-activated sludge. Water Research, 45(4), 1597–1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.11.042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.11.042
Han, Y., Sung, S., & Dague, R. R. (1997). Temperature-phased anaerobic digestion of wastewater sludges. Water Science and Technology, 36(6–7), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1997.0612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1997.0612
Harris, W. L., & Dague, R. R. (1993). Comparative performance of anaerobic filters at mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures. Water Environment Research, 65(6), 764–771. https://doi.org/10.2175/wer.65.6.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2175/WER.65.6.9
Hu, Y., & Shen, C. (2024). Thermophilic–mesophilic temperature phase anaerobic co-digestion compared with single-phase co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste. Scientific Reports, 14, 11967. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62998-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62998-w
IBM Corp. (2022). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 29.0) [Computer software]. IBM Corp., Armonk, NY.
Kaiser, S. K., & Dague, R. R. (1994). The temperature-phased anaerobic biofilter process. Water Science Technology, 29(9), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1994.0483 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1994.0483
Kim, M., Ahn, Y-H., & Speece, R. E. (2002). Comparative process stability and efficiency of anaerobic digestion; mesophilic vs. thermophilic. Water Research, 36(17), 4369-4385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00147-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00147-1
Leite, W. R. M., Gottardo, M., Pavan, P., Belli Filho, P., & Bolzonella, D. (2016). Performance and energy aspects of single and two-phase thermophilic anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. Renewable Energy, 86, 1324–1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.09.069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.09.069
Li, Y., Chen, Y., & Wu, J. (2019). Enhancement of methane production in anaerobic digestion process: A review. Applied Energy, 240, 120–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.243
Li, Y., Park, S. Y., & Zhu, J. (2011). Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(1), 821-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.042
Lv, W., Schanbacher, F. L., & Yu, Z. (2010). Putting microbes to work in sequence: Recent advances in temperature-phased anaerobic digestion processes. Bioresource Technology, 101(24), 9409–9414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.100
Lv, W., Zhang, W., & Yu, Z. (2016). Volume ratios between the thermophilic and the mesophilic digesters of a temperature-phased anaerobic digestion system affect their performance and microbial communities. New Biotechnology, 33(1), 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2015.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2015.07.001
Oles, J., Dichtl, N., & Niehoff, H. H. (1997). Full-scale experience of two-stage thermophilic/ mesophilic sludge digestion. Water Science and Technology, 36(6–7), 449–456. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1997.0622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1997.0622
Ruffino, B., Campo, G., Cerutti, A., Scibilia, G., Lorenzi, E., & Zanetti, M. (2020). Comparative analysis between a conventional and a temperature-phased anaerobic digestion system: Monitoring of the process, resources transformation and energy balance. Energy Conversion and Management, 223, 113463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113463 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113463
Sambo, A. S., Garba, B., & Danshehu, B. G. (1995). Effect of some operating parameters on biogas production rate. Renewable Energy, 6(3), 343–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1481(95)00027-H DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1481(95)00027-H
Sillero, L., Perez, M., & Solera, R. (2023a). Temperature-phased enhanced the single-stage anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge, wine vinasse and poultry manure: Perspectives for the circular economy. Fuel, 331(Part 2), 125761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125761 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125761
Sillero, L., Solera, R., & Pérez, M. (2023b). Thermophilic–mesophilic temperature phase anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge, wine vinasse and poultry manure: Effect of hydraulic retention time on mesophilic-methanogenic stage. Chemical Engineering Journal, 451(Part 2), 138478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.138478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.138478
Sung, S., & Santha, H. (2001). Performance of temperature-phased anaerobic digestion system treating dairy cattle wastes. Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 4(4), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.2001.4.4.08
Sung, S., & Santha, H. (2003). Performance of temperature-phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) system treating dairy cattle wastes. Water Research, 37(7), 1628–1636. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00498-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00498-0
Watts, J., Wilson, C. A., & Parker, W. J. (2006). Performance of temperature phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) systems treating waste activated sludge. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation (WEFTEC), 2006(14), 479–490. https://doi.org/10.2175/193864706783803467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2175/193864706783803467
Wu, L.-J., Ye, F., Yang, F., & Lyu, Y.-K. (2025). Applicability of temperature-phased anaerobic digestion in enhancing methanation of high-solid sludge: Process performance, microbial community analysis and energy balance assessment. Bioresource Technology, 431, 132614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132614
Zhang, C., Su, H., Baeyens, J., & Tan, T. (2014). Reviewing the anaerobic digestion of food waste for biogas production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 38, 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.038
