Assessment of comparative hardness of sugarcane varieties at nodes and internodes

Authors

  • SI Anwar Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Raebareli Road, Lucknow - 226 002, Utter Pradesh, India Author
  • R Banerjit Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Raebareli Road, Lucknow - 226 002, Utter Pradesh, India Author
  • SK Chaudhary Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Raebareli Road, Lucknow - 226 002, Utter Pradesh, India Author
  • B Baboo Central Institute of Post Harvest Engineering & Technology, PAU Campus, Ludhiana, Punjab, India Author
  • R Kumar Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Raebareli Road, Lucknow - 226 002, Utter Pradesh, India Author
  • V K Madan Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Raebareli Road, Lucknow - 226 002, Utter Pradesh, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52151/

Abstract

Assessment of comparative hardness of sugarcane was done using compression testing machine with tension compression proving ring. Hardness of nodes and internodes of three early and four mid late cane varieties was assessed. Nodes were observed to be harder than internodes. Data on node and internode hardness showed that amongst early and mid late varieties, hardness of both node and internode of CoLk 8102 was maximum (0.82 and 0.67 kN force was required for breaking node and internode respectively) indicating it to be the hardest amongst the cane varieties tested. Data on hardness of each node and internode from top to bottom at IO & 12 month crop age revealed that nodes and internodes at 12 months were harder than the nodes and internodes at 10 month crop age.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • B Baboo, Central Institute of Post Harvest Engineering & Technology, PAU Campus, Ludhiana, Punjab, India

      

References

Puri AN and Venkatraman TS. 1929. An apparatus for testing ring hardness of sugar-cane. Proc: Sug. Tech. Assoc., India 15-19.

Mungomery RW. 1936 The rind hardness machine and its use. Cane Growers' Bull. 4, 51-53.

Cocharan, BJ. 1974. Engineering properties of sugarcane and their relation to mechanical harvesting. Sugar y. Azucar, March, 29-37.

Baboo B and Singh K. 1988. Compressive strength of jaggery. J. Institution of Engineers (India) 68(Ag.2), 62-66.

Downloads

Published

2000-09-30

Issue

Section

Regular Issue

How to Cite

SI Anwar, R Banerjit, SK Chaudhary, B Baboo, R Kumar, & V K Madan. (2000). Assessment of comparative hardness of sugarcane varieties at nodes and internodes. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 37(03), 7-10. https://doi.org/10.52151/