Brink depth technique to measure free overfall in field channels

Authors

  • Manasmani Dev Goswami Dept. of Agriculture, Assam, Guwahati- 781022 Author
  • MM Das Prof. of Emeritus, Assam Engineering College, Guwahati - 781013, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52151/

Abstract

The easy and accurate measurement of irrigation water through field distributaries permits its economic use. Less number of measurement of flow parameters in channels will minimize the error in discharge calculation. A laboratory procedure was carried out to develop the measurement technique of flow in irrigation channels. The relationship amongst the brink depth, Ye' the critical depth, yC  and unit discharge, q, is developed as q=cyek, where c, k are constants. In present investigation, the relations are yc=1.37 Ye and q=5.08 ye3/2. Similarly a relationship among, ye/yo, y/yo and q, where Yo is the normal depth was found as y/Yo=1.33 y/yo and q=4.80 y3/2. The results are tested in" field distributaries and the technique was found suitable in different field conditions. There is little impact of infiltration characteristics on discharge evaluation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bauer SW and Graf WH. 1971. Free overfall as a flow measuring device. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, March. p:73-83

Chow VT. 1959. Open channel hydraulic. Mc Graw Hill Book Co., Inc." New York.

Fathy A and Amin MS. 1954. Hydraulic of the free overfall. Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers, Dec. p:I-12.

Michael AM. 1986. Irrigation theory and practice. Vikash Publishing House Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.

Rouse H. 1936. Discharge characteristics of the free overfall. Journal of Civil Engg., American Society of Civil Engineers, April p:257-260.

Published

2000-03-31

Issue

Section

Regular Issue

How to Cite

Manasmani Dev Goswami, & MM Das. (2000). Brink depth technique to measure free overfall in field channels. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 37(01), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.52151/