Moisture Dependent Physical Properties of Multiplier Onion (Allium cepa L. var. aggregatum)

Gomathy K; M. Balakrishnan; V. Thirupathi

doi:10.52151/jae2017541.1620

Authors

Gomathy K Department of Food and Agricultural Process Engineering, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore – 641 003, India. Author
M. Balakrishnan Department of Food and Agricultural Process Engineering, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore – 641 003, India. Author
V. Thirupathi Department of Food and Agricultural Process Engineering, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore – 641 003, India. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2017541.1620

Keywords:

Multiplier onion, moisture content, geometrical properties, physical properties, frictional properties

Abstract

The physical properties of multiplier onion (CO-4) were studied as a function of moisture content in the range of 80.87 % to 88.84 % (w.b.). The geometrical, physical and frictional properties, namely size, true density, bulk density and coefficient of friction increased with increase in moisture content. The average equatorial diameter, polar diameter and thickness of onion ranged from 30.8 to 34.0 mm, 24.2 to 25.9 mm, 18.6 to 21.0 mm, respectively at a moisture range of 80.87 % to 88.84 % (w.b.). The true density ranged from 887.0 to 933.0 kg.m-3, whereas the bulk density of onion bulbs varied from 397.54 to 462.63 kg.m-3 at the above moisture range. The highest friction was offered by rubber, followed by cardboard, mild steel, galvanised iron and stainless steel. The porosity of onion decreased from 55.13 % to 50.39 % with increase in moisture content. Linear equations comprising the thickness, polar and equatorial diameter predicted the mass of onion bulbs with highest R2 value of 0.998.

References

Abdel-Ghaffar E A; Hindey F I. 1984. Linear airflow resistance of onions. J. Agric. Res., 10, 721–735.

Abd-el rahman M M; Ebeaid M T. 2009. Some factors affecting artificial curing of onion bulbs and its effects on the storability. Misr. J. Agric. Eng., 26, 905- 921.

Abhayawick L; Laguerre J C; Tauzin V; Duquenoy A. 2002. Physical properties of three onion varieties as affected by the moisture content. J. Food Eng., 55, 253–262.

Aghkhani M H; Miraei Ashtiani S H; Baradaran Motie J; Abbaspour-Fard M H. 2012. Physical properties of Christmas Lima bean at different moisture content. Int. Agrophys., 26, 341-346.

AOAC. 1996. Official Methods of Analysis. XVI Ed., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington D. C.

Bagherpour H; Minaei S; Khoshtaghaza M H. 2010. Selected physico - mechanical properties of lentil seed. Int. Agrophys., 24, 81-84.

Bahnasawy A H; El-Haddad Z A; El-Ansary M Y; Sorour H M. 2004. Physical and mechanical properties of some Egyptian onion cultivars. J. Food Eng., 62, 255–261.

Balakrishnan M; Manikantan M R; Viswanathan R; Sreenarayanan V V. 2011. Moisture dependent physical properties of cardamom.Int. Agrophys., 25, 399-402.

Balasubramanian S; Singh K K; Kumar R. 2012. Physical properties of coriander seeds at different moisture content. Int. Agrophys., 26, 419-422.

Chandrasekar V; Viswanathan R. 1999. Physical and thermal properties of coffee. J. Agric. Eng. Res.,73, 227 -234.

Cokuner Y; Karababa E. 2007. Some physical properties of flax seed (Linumusitatissimum L.). J. Food Eng., 78, 1067-1073.

Dabhi M N; Varshney A K; Jain K K; Vyas DM; Nandasana J N. 2011. Status Report of Onion Storage and Dehydration Industry in Gujarat. Report on All India Coordinated Research Project on Post Harvest Technology, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh, pp: 38.

Dursun E; Dursun I. 2005. Some physical properties of caper seed. Biosyst. Eng., 92 (2), 237-245.

Eweida M H; Osman M S; Okaz A MA; Anous MY. 1986. Application of ethephon onion. 1. Effect on yield, yield components and bulb characteristics at harvest and during storage. Al-Azahar J. Agric. Res., 1, 467–476.

Hossein G; Neman M; Mehdi S S; Ali H; Farzin A. 2013. Physical properties of three Iranian onion varieties. Int. Res. J. Appl. Basic Sci., 7, 587-593.

Kingsley A R P; Singh D B; Manikantan M R; Jain R K. 2006. Moisture dependent physical properties of dried pomegranate seeds. J. Food Eng.,75, 492-496.

Kumar J; Prabhakar P K; Srivastav P P; Bhowmick P K. 2016. Moisture dependent physical properties of chironji (Buchanania Lanzan) nut. J. Agric. Eng., 53(2), 45-54.

Mohan K T L; Mallikarjuna H B; Darshan M B; Gowda Sathish C S. 2011. Comparative study of univariate time series technique for forecasting of onion price. Int. J. Commer. Bus. Stud., 4(2), 304-308.

Mohsenin N N. 1980. Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials. Gordon and Breach Press, New York, USA.

National Horticultural Board. 2014. Indian Horticulture Database. Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, pp: 165.

Sahay K M; Singh K K. 1994. Unit operation of Agricultural Processing. Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Limited, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India, pp :374.

Selvi K C; Pinar Y; Yesiloglu E. 2006. Some physical properties of linseed. Biosyst. Eng., 95(4), 607-612.

Slimestad R; Fossen T; Vågen I M. 2007. Onions: A source of unique dietary flavonoids. J. Agric. Food Chem., 55, 67-80.

Umesh A; Narayan S R; Venkatesan K; Saraswathi T; Subramanian K S. 2015. Response on growth, yield and quality parameters of multiplier onion (Allium Cepa L. var. aggregatum Don.) var. CO (On) 5 with different doses and method of zinc and boron application. Int. J. Agric. Res., 6, 59-67.

Unal H; Isik E; Izli N; Tekin Y. 2008. Geometric and mechanical properties of mung bean (Vignaradiata L.) grain: Effect of moisture. Int. J. Food Prop., 11(3),585- 599.

Yang J; Meyers K J; Van Der Heide J; Liu R H. 2004. Varietal differences in phenolic content and antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of onions. J. Agric. Food Chem., 52, 6787–6793.