Optimization of Counter-Rotating Cotton Stalk Puller Performance Using Response Surface Methodology and ANN-PSO Technique
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2026632.2018Keywords:
cotton mechanization, hybrid ANN-PSO, particle swarm optimization, plant breakage, uprooting efficiencyAbstract
Cotton stalks, a by-product remaining after cotton picking, have significant industrial value. However, their removal is difficult due to the deep taproot system, making stalk uprooting labour-intensive. This study focuses on optimizing the uprooting efficiency of a counter-rotating drum-type cotton stalk puller (CSP) using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and an integrated Artificial Neural Network-Particle Swarm Optimization (ANN-PSO) approach. The developed tractor-operated machine consists of counter-rotating tapered drums with adjustable, spring-loaded clearance to effectively grip and uproot stalks of varying sizes with minimal breakage, even under hard soil conditions. The machine's operational and design parameters were considered as independent variables, whereas uprooting efficiency, plant breakage, and plants left in the field were considered response variables. An experimental CSP unit was evaluated under field conditions at three forward speeds (1.37, 1.67, and 1.95 km h⁻¹), four drum speeds (250, 300, 350, and 400 rpm), and three drum inclination angles (0°, 10°, and 20°). Optimization using RSM indicated that a drum speed of 332.5 rpm, a drum inclination angle of 8.36°, and a forward speed of 1.37 km h⁻¹ were the optimal operating conditions. Under these conditions, the optimum values of uprooting efficiency, plant breakage, and plants left in the field were 96.6%, 2.8%, and 1.1%, respectively, with individual desirability values of 0.97, 0.85, and 0.89, indicating good agreement between the predicted and observed responses. The ANN-PSO model predicted the optimal operating parameters as a forward speed of 1.37 km h⁻¹, a drum inclination angle of 7.89°, and a drum speed of 331.45 rpm. The observed and predicted values of uprooting efficiency under these conditions were 96.72% and 94.84%, respectively. The results demonstrated that both RSM and the integrated ANN-PSO approach effectively predicted and optimized the performance of the CSP, with high accuracy. The optimization study provides valuable insights into the optimal combination of design and operating parameters for achieving enhanced uprooting efficiency with minimal plant breakage.
Downloads
References
Al Afif, R., Pfeifer, C., & Pröll, T. (2019). Bioenergy recovery from cotton stalk. In: M. Ansari (ed), Advances in Cotton Research. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88005
Anantachar, M., Kumar, P. G. V., & Guruswamy, T. (2010). Neural network prediction of performance parameters of an inclined plate seed metering device and its reverse mapping for the determination of optimum design and operational parameters. Computer and Electronics in Agriculture, 72(2), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2010.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2010.03.001
Anonymous. (2019). ICAR-CIAE Annual Report 2018-19, Report No. CIAE/2019/38. ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal. pp. 9.
Cai, J., Zhang, J., Gao, Z., Wang, X., Guo, G., Baikeli, Y., Tang, X., & Wang, Y. (2024). Design and test of a wheel-belt type cotton stalk puller. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 17(2), 102-108. https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20241702.7287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20241702.7287
CCI. (n.d.). Statistics on Area, production and productivity of cotton in India from 1947-48 onwards. Cotton Corporation of India (CCI). Available at: https://cotcorp.org.in/statistics (accessed on 11 May 2026).
Fawzy, S., Osman, A. I., Farrell, C., Al‐Muhtaseb, A. H., Harrison, J., Al‐Fatesh, A. S., Fakeeha, A. H., Doran, J., Yang, H., & Rooney, D. W. (2021). Characterization and kinetic modelling for pyrolytic conversion of cotton stalks. Energy Science & Engineering, 9(10), 1908-1918. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.961 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.961
Huang, W., Bai, Z., Hoefel, D., Hu, Q., Lv, X., Zhuang, G., Xu, S., Qi, H., & Zhang, H. (2012). Effects of cotton straw amendment on soil fertility and microbial communities. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 6, 336-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-011-0337-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-011-0337-z
Khan, A. A., Umair, S., Rudra, R. P., Ehsan, F., Kashif, M., Khan, M. M., Hashim, S., Zohaib, M., & Ahmad, S. I. (2023). Structural analysis of cotton stalk puller and shredder machine. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 64, 335-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.09.002
Manian, R., Rao, M. K., Kathirvel, K., & Senthilkumar, T. (2004). Efficiency of cotton stalk puller as influenced by forward speed, wheel rotational speed and wheel tilt angle. AMA, Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America, 35(1), 37-41.
Meng, Q., Gu, J., Xu, Z., Zhang, J., Tang, J., Wang, A., Wang, P., Liu, Z., Rong, Y., Xie, P., Hui, L., Udall, J. A., Grover, C. E., Wendel, J. F., Jin, S., Zhang, X., & Yuan, D. (2023). Comparative analysis of genome sequences of the two cultivated tetraploid cottons, Gossypium hirsutum (L.) and G. barbadense (L.), Industrial Crops and Products. 196, 116471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116471 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116471
Pandirwar, A. P., Khadatkar, A., Mehta, C. R., Majumdar, G., Idapuganti, R., Mageshwaran, V., & Shirale, A. O. (2023a). Technological advancement in harvesting of cotton stalks to establish sustainable raw material supply chain for industrial applications: A review. BioEnergy Research. 16(2), 741-760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-022-10520-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-022-10520-3
Pandirwar, A. P., Pandey, H. S., Magar, A. P., Shirale, A. O., Singh, D., Majumdar, G., & Mandal, S. (2023b). Physical, chemical, thermal, and mechanical properties of cotton stalk: An industrial multi-purpose cotton by-product. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 60(2), 188-204. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2023602.1807 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2023602.1807
Pandirwar, A., Pandey, H., Magar, A. P., Roul, A. K., Kumar, M., & Jyoti, B. (2024). Optimization of uprooting efficiency of counter-rotating cotton stalk puller for on-field operations. PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square (Posted on 15 September 2024). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4874230/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4874230/v1
Pareek, C. M., Tewari, V. K., & Machavaram, R. (2023). Multi-objective optimization of seeding performance of a pneumatic precision seed metering device using integrated ANN-MOPSO approach. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 117, 105559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105559 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105559
Pareek, C. M., Tewari, V. K., Machavaram, R., & Nare, B. (2021). Optimizing the seed-cell filling performance of an inclined plate seed metering device using integrated ANN-PSO approach. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture, 5, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2020.11.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2020.11.002
Peng, W. L., Mohd-Nasir, H., Setapar, S. H. M., Ahmad, A., & Lokhat, D. (2019). Optimization of process variables using response surface methodology for tocopherol extraction from Roselle seed oil by supercritical carbon dioxide. Industrial Crops and Products, 143, 111886 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111886 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111886
Pothecarey, B. P., & Ofield, R. J. (1968). Destruction of old cotton for pest and disease control. World Crops, 20(8), 39-43.
Raj, J. V. A., Kumar, R. P., Vijayakumar, B., Gnansounou, E., & Bharathiraja, B. (2021). Modelling and process optimization for biodiesel production from Nannochloropsissalina using artificial neural network. Bioresource Technology, 329, 124872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124872 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124872
Ramanjaneyulu, A. V., Ramprasad, B., Sainath, N., Umarani, E., Pallavi, C., Vijay, J., & Jagadeeshwar, R. (2021). Crop residue management in cotton. Chronicle of Bio resource Management, 5(1), 001-008.
Sankar, P. A., Machavaram, R., & Shankar, K. (2014). System identification of a composite plate using hybrid response surface methodology and particle swarm optimization in time domain. Measurement, 55, 499-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.05.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.05.025
Silverstein, R. A., Chen, Y., Sharma-Shivappa, R. R., Boyette, M. D., & Osborne, J. (2007). A comparison of chemical pretreatment methods for improving saccharification of cotton stalks. Bioresource Technology, 98(16), 3000-3011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.10.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.10.022
Solanki, H. B., & Yadav, R. (2009). Development and performance evaluation of tractor operated plant uprooter for castor crop. Agriculture Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America, 40(2), 41-46.
Sumner, H. R., Hellwig, R. E., & Monroe, G. E. (1984a). Harvesting cotton plat residue for fuel. Transactions of the ASAE, 27(4), 968-972. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.32905 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.32905
Sumner, H. R., Monroe, G. E., & Hellwig, G.E. (1984b). Design elements of a cotton plant puller. Transactions of the ASAE, 27(2), 366-369. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.3279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.32792
Sutaria, G. S., Vora, V. D., Vekariya, P. D., & Akbari, K. N. (2016). Technology for rapid composting of cotton stalk. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, 6(1), 211–216.
Tao, Y., Wu, D., Zhang, Q. -A., & Sun, D. -W. (2014). Ultrasound-assisted extraction of phenolics from wine lees: Modeling, optimization and stability of extracts during storage. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 21(2), 706-715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.09.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.09.005
Taoufik, N., Boumya, W., Elmoubarki, R., Elhalil, A., Achak, M., Abdennouri, M., & Barka, N. (2022). Experimental design, machine learning approaches for the optimization and modeling of caffeine adsorption. Materials Today Chemistry, 23, 100732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2021.100732 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2021.100732
USDA. (n.d). Production – Cotton: Top Producing Countries, 2025/2026. The United States Department of Agriculture. Available at: https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/production/2631000 (accessed on 11 May 2026).
Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Shen, S., Li, J., Huo, Y., & Wang, Z. (2024). The mechanical analysis and comparative performance test of the roller-type pulling mechanism for the whole cotton stalk pulling machine. Agriculture, 14(3), 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030506
Wendel, J. F., & Grover, C. E. (2015). Taxonomy and evolution of the cotton genus, Gossypium. In: D. D. Fang, & R. G. Percy (Eds), Cotton (Vol. 57, pp. 25-44). American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc., Soil Science Society of America, Inc. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr57.2013.0020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr57.2013.0020
Wondi, M. H., Haris, N. I. N., Shamsudin, R., Yunus, R., Ali, M. M., & Iswardi, A. H. (2024). Development and testing of an oil palm (Elaeisguineensis Jacq.) fruit digester process for kernel free in crude palm oil production. Industrial Crops and Products, 208, 117755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117755 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117755
Xue, Z., Fu, J., Fu, Q., Li, X., & Chen, Z. (2023). Modelling and optimizing the performance of green forage maize harvester header using a combined Response Surface Methodology-Artificial Neural Network approach. Agriculture, 13(10), 1890. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101890 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101890
