Ergonomic Evaluation of Rotary Power Input by Hand and Leg Muscles to Operate Farm Equipment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2011483.1445Abstract
An ergonomic study was conducted to evaluate common postures to facilitate active combination of body muscles to generate rotational motion in static mode. The study was conducted on five modes of posture, namely handle rotation, hand rocking, single foot pedal, dual foot pedal and foot rotation (cycling) for generating rotary motion. A postural dynamometer was developed for loading and recording power load in above-mentioned modes. The experiments were conducted with six subjects in the age group of 20 to 40 years at five levels of mechanical load. During the experiments, physiological and postural parameters were recorded and data was statistically analyzed. Foot cycling mode was found to be best for mechanical power load up to 60W and dual foot pedal mode for 60 to 75 W. Study established the fact that leg muscles are better suited to provide manual power on sustainable basis as in both modes (cycling and dual foot pedal), leg muscles were primarily used.Downloads
References
Anon. 2003. 17th Livestock Census. All India Summary Report. Department of Animal Husbandry, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt of India.
Bridger R S. 1995. Introduction to Ergonomics. McGraw- Hill, Inc, New York, pp: 205-210.
Corlett E N; Bishop R P. 1976. A technique for assessing postural discomfort. Ergonomics, 19, 175-182.
Davies C T M; Harris E A. 1964. Heart rate during transition from rest to exercise in relation to exercise tolerance. J. Appl. Physiology, 19, 857-862.
Ghugare B D; Adhaoo S H; Gite L P; Pandya A C; Patel S L. 1991. Ergonomic evaluation of a lever operated knapsack sprayer. App. Ergonomics, 22, 241-50.
Gite L P; Yadav B G. 1990. Optimum handle height for a push-pull type manually operated dryland weeder. Ergonomics, 33, 1487-1494.
Inbar O; Dotan R; Trousit T; Dvir Z. 1983. The effect of bicycle crank- length variation upon power performance. Ergonomics, 26, 1139-1146.
Kroemer K H E; Grandjean E. 2000. Fitting the task to the Human. A textbook of occupational ergonomics. Fifth Ed., Taylor & Francis Ltd., UK, pp:416.
Kroemer K H E; Kroemer H J; Kroemer-Elbert K E. 1997. Engineering Physiology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Marais G; Dupont L; Maillet M; Weissland T; Vanvelcenaher J; Pelayo P. 2002. Cardio respiratory and efficiency responses during arm and leg exercises with spontaneously chosen crank and pedal rates. Ergonomics, 45, 631-639.
Marsh G D; Paterson D H; Govindasamy D; Cunningham D A. 1999. Anaerobic power of the arms and legs of young and older men. Exp. Physiol., 84, 589-597.
Nag P K; Goswami A; Ashtekar S P; Pradhan C K. 1988. Ergonomics in sickle operation. Appl. Ergonomics, 19, 233-239.
Nag P K; Sebastian N C; Malvanker M G. 1980. Occupational workload of Indian Agricultural workers. Ergonomics, 23, 91-102.
Pendergast D R. 1989. Cardiovascular, respiratory and metabolic responses to upper body exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 21, S121- S125.
Ramchandra Ram; Adarsh Kumar; J.K. Singh; Jha S K, Indra Mani, V Ramasubramanian. 2008. Ergonomic evaluation of foot operated rotary power generation. J. Agric. Engng., 45(3), 12-18.
Sanders M S, McCormick E J. 1993. Human Factors in Engineering and Design. Seventh Ed. Mc Graw Hill, Inc, New York.
Sawka M N. 1986. Physiology of upper body exercise. Exercise and Sport Sci. Rev., 14, 175-211.
Solanki S N; Ramteke R T; Kawade S C; Gite L P. 2006. Ergonomic evaluation of hand operated maize shellers. J. Agric. Engng., 43(4), 119-125.
Tiwari V K; Datta R K; Murthy A S R. 1991. Evaluation of three manually operated weeding devices. Appl. Ergonomics, 22(2), 111-116.
