Performance Assessment of Tractor-operated Bund Former for Mulched Field
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2022591.1761Keywords:
Bund, bund former, straw management, rotor speed ratio, straw loadAbstract
Managing paddy field loaded with straw before wheat sowing in paddy-wheat crop production system is cumbersome due to various operations involved in the process. Bund forming for irrigation remains difficult among these operations due to mulched conditions. Simultaneous removal of straw (up to 1.25 m width), soil pulverization, and trapezoidal-shaped soil bund forming in one pass is required. Field evaluation of a tractor-operated bund former for mulched fields was conducted to observe the effects of rotor speed ratios (3:1, 4:1, 5:1), opening width of bund forming plates (270, 340, 410 mm), and straw loads (4.0-4.5, 6.0-6.5 t.ha-1) on the pulverization index (mm), height of bund (mm), width of bund (mm), fuel consumption (l.h-1) and field capacity (ha.h-1) of the machine. The effects of rotor speed ratio, opening width of bund forming plates, and straw load were significant (p<0.05) on pulverization index, bund height, bund width, and fuel consumption. Best performances were obtained at rotor speed ratio of 4:1 and bund forming plates opening width of 340 mm under both straw loads. This combination gave the optimum height of bund (277.6 mm), bund width (720 mm), pulverization index (12.76 mm), and fuel consumption (7.05 l.h-1) under both straw loads. The effective field capacity of the tractor-operated bund former was 1.17 ha.h-1 at forward travel speed of 1.5 km.h-1. The operational cost of the bund former was 792.36 ₹.ha-1.
References
Anon. 2003. Addressing Resource Conservation Issues in Rice–Wheat Systems of South Asia: A Resource Book. Rice–Wheat Consortium of the Indo-Gangetic Plains – International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre, New Delhi, ISBN 81-88572-00-4, pp: 304.
Anon. 2010. Options for Effective Utilization of Crop Residues. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Research Bulletin No. 3, pp: 32.
Anon. 2017. Mechanical management of paddy straw. All India Coordinated Research Project on Farm Implements and Machinery, ICAR- Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal, pp: 30.
Anon. 2018. Agricultural Statistics at glance 2018. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, 218-468
Anon. 2019a. International Rice Research Institute. www.irri.org/rice-straw-management (Accessed on 26.07.2019).
Anon. 2019b. Review of the Scheme “Promotion of Agricultural Mechanisation for In-situ Management of Crop Residue in States of Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and NCT of Delhi”. Report of the Committee, Department. of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, New Delhi, pp: 36.
Anon. 2019c. Package of Practices for Rabi Crops. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, pp:13.
Anon. 2020a. Handbook of Agriculture 2020. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, pp:125.
Anon. 2022. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (Accessed on 07.03.2022).
Bhambota S; Manes G S; Prakash A; Dixit A. 2017. IS: 9164, Studies on effect of blade shape and rotor speed of rotavator on pulverization and mixing quality. Agric. Res. J., 54, 394-397.
Bhuvaneshwari S; Hettiarachchi H; Meegoda J N. 2019. Crop residue burning in India: Policy challenges and potential solutions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16, 1-19.
BIS. 1979. Guide for Estimating Cost of Farm Machinery Operation. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, IS: 9164, pp: 18.
Kumar A; Singh V K; Narender; Kumar R. 2014. Utilization of paddy straw as animal feed. Forage Res., 40, 154-158.
Kepner R A; Bainer R; Barger E L. 2005. Principles of Farm Machinery. Third Edition, The AVI Publishing Company, Inc. USA, 368-382.
Libin Z; Jiandong J; Yanbiao L. 2010. Agricultural rotavator power requirement optimization using multiobjective probability parameter optimization. Int. Agric. Eng. J., 19 (19), 15-22.
Manpreet S. 2011. Design and development of tractor operated seeder for wheat as relay crop in cotton. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India. pp: 207.
Mahal J S; Manes G S; Singh A; Kaur S; Singh M. 2019. Complementing solutions and strategies for managing rice straw and their impact in the state of Punjab. Agric. Res. J., 56(3), 588-593.
Mehta M L; Verma S R; Mishra S R; Sharma V K. 2005. Testing and Evaluation of Agricultural Machinery. Daya Publishing House, Delhi-100 035, pp: 253.
Modi R U; Manjunatha K; Gauam P V; Nageshkumar T; Sanodiya R; Chaudhary V; Murthy G R K; Srinivas I; Rao C S. 2020. Climate-smart technologybased farm mechanization for enhanced input use efficiency. In: Srinivasarao C; Srinivas T; Rao R V S; Rao N S; Vinayagam S S; Krishnan P (Eds.) Climate Change and Indian Agriculture: Challenges and Adaption Strategies, ICAR-National Academy of Agricultural Research and Management, Hyderabad, Telangana, India, 325-358.
Nkakini. 2014. Performance evaluation of disc ridging tractive force model in loamy sand soil using sensitivity measured parameters. Agric. Eng. Int. CIGR J., 16, 15-21.
Sood A. 2020. Development and evaluation of tractor operated bund former for mulched fields. Unpublished M.Tech. Thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India, pp: 90
Thakur S S; Chandel R; Narang M K. 2018. Studies on straw management techniques using paddy straw chopper-cum-spreader along with various tillage practices and subsequent effect of various sowing techniques on wheat yield and economics. Agric. Mech. Asia Afr. Latin Am., 49, 52-66.
Xian-Jun J; De-Ti X. 2009. Combining ridge with no-tillage in lowland rice- base cropping system: long-term effect on soil and rice yield. Pedosphere, 19, 515-522.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
