Droplet Distribution and Weed Control Efficacy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Sprayer in Wheat Crop
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2022592.1770Keywords:
Aerial sprayer, drone, herbicide, knapsack sprayer, UAV, wheat cropAbstract
Herbicide application with Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) is among few breakthroughs due to drift risk and loading capacity limitations. This study explored a perspective of using UAVs to spray herbicides. Effects of different treatments (control, knapsack sprayer, knapsack sprayer with adjuvant, UAV sprayer, UAV sprayer with adjuvant) were observed in pre- and post-herbicide spray applications in wheat crop to compare droplet distribution pattern and Phalaris minor weed control efficacy of UAV sprayer with a knapsack sprayer, and its effect on yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crop. Uniformity Coefficient was found in the range of 1.80 - 2.25 using a UAV sprayer, and was similar (1.18 - 2.12) to that for the use of knapsack sprayer. However, volume median diameter (VMD) of UAV sprayer was in the range of 437.33 µm to 540.67 µm, while it was in the range of 670.33 µm to 768.33 µm in case of knapsack sprayer. The droplets of UAV sprayer with adjuvant and knapsack sprayer with adjuvant were bigger in size as compared to treatments without adjuvant. Least Phalaris minor weed density after 60-day crop was observed in the case of UAV sprayer with adjuvant treatment, but there was no significant difference between UAV sprayer and knapsack sprayer in weed control density. Higher yield was observed with UAV sprayer treatments as compared to knapsack sprayer and control treatments.
References
Anon. 2017. Package of Practices for Crops of Punjab Rabi 2017-2018. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 1-18. ISSN 2278-3709.
Anon. 2019. Extensive analysis of the top ten wheat producing countries. https://www.bizvibe.com/blog/agriculture/top-10-wheat-producingcountries, Accessed on 16.07.2019.
Anon. 2019b. Package of Practices for Crops of Punjab Rabi 2017-2018. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 1-18. ISSN 2278-3709.
Awan T; Sta Cruz P; Chauhan B. 2016. Effect of preemergence herbicides and timing of soil saturation on the control of six major rice weeds and their phytotoxic effects on rice seedlings. Crop Protect., 83, 37-47.
Dash B S; Kumar Arun; Modi Rajesh U; Namdev S K. 2020. Design and performance evaluation of self propelled intra-canopy boom spraying system. J. Agric. Eng., 57 (3), 195-209.
FAOSTAT. 2022. Area, yield and production (wheat). Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL , accessed on 25.04.2022
Faical B S; Freitas H; Gomes P H; Mano L Y; Pessin G; de Carvalho A C; Ueyama J. 2017. An adaptive approach for UAV-based pesticide spraying in dynamic environments. Comput. Electron. Agric., 138, 210-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.04.011
Garcera C; Fonte A; Molto E; Chueca P. 2017. Sustainable use of pesticide applications in citrus: A support tool for volume rate adjustment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 14(7), 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070715
Huang Y; Hoffmann W C; Lan Y; Wu W; Fritz B K. 2009. Development of a spray system for an unmanned aerial vehicle platform. Appl. Eng. Agric., 25(6), 803-809.
Kumar S; Singh M. 2020a. Comparison of bioefficacy of auto-rotate gun sprayer with knapsack sprayer for control of Bemisia tabaci in cotton crop. Pantnagar J. Res., 18(1), 53-60.
Kumar S; Singh M; Manes G S; Pathania M. 2020b. Development and evaluation of PAU multi-purpose sprayer to control whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) in cotton. Indian J. Agric. Sci.,90 (6), 1160–1165.
Kumar S; Singh M; Manes G S; Arora J. 2020c. Comparative field evaluation of auto-rotate gun sprayer for control of Bemisia tabaci in a cotton crop. Afr. Entom., 28(2), 300-311. doi/10.4001/003.028.0300
Martinez-Guanter J; Agüera P; Agüera J; PérezRuiz M. 2020. Spray and economics assessment of a UAV-based ultra-low-volume application in olive and citrus orchards. Precis. Agric., 21(1), 226-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-019-09665-7
Meng Y; Lan Y; Mei G; Guo Y; Song J; Wang Z. 2018. Effect of aerial spray adjuvant applying on the efficiency of small unmanned aerial vehicle for wheat aphids control. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 11(5), 46-53.
Mohammadi H; Ismail B S. 2018. Effect of herbicides on the density of broad leaf weeds and their effect on the growth and yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Agric., 17(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20181105.4298
Pajares G. 2015. Overview and current status of remote sensing applications based on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 81(4), 281- 330. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.81.4.281
Teske M E; Wachspress D A; Thistle H W. 2018. Prediction of aerial spray release from UAVs. Trans. ASABE, 61(3), 909-918. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.12701
Urbahs A; Jonaite I. 2013. Features of the use of unmanned aerial vehicles for agriculture applications. Aviat., 17(4), 170-175. https://doi.org/10.3846/16487788.2013.861224
Varshney S; Hayat S; Alyemeni M; Ahmad A. 2012. Effects of herbicide applications in wheat fields. Plant Signaling Behav., 7(5), 570-575. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.19689
Verma A; Singh M; Parmar R P; Bhullar K S. 2022. Feasibility study on hexacopter UAV based sprayer for application of environment-friendly bio pesticide in guava orchard. J. Environ. Biol., 43, 97- 104. http://doi.org/10.22438/jeb/43/1/MRN-1912
Wang G; Lan Y; Qi H; Chen P; Hewitt A; Han Y. 2019. Field evaluation of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer: Effect of spray volume on deposition and the control of pests and disease in wheat. Pest Manage. Sci., 75(6), 1546-1555. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5321
Xiongkui H; Bonds J; Herbst A; Langenakens J. 2017. Recent development of unmanned aerial vehicle for plant protection in East Asia, Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 10(3), 18-30.
Xue X; Lan Y; Sun Z; Chang C; Hoffmann W C. 2016. Develop an unmanned aerial vehicle based automatic aerial spraying system. Comput. Elecron. Agric., 128, 58-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.07.022