Reach Envelopes for Indian Tractor Operators Based on Anthropometry with a Gender-Neutral Perspective

R. R. Potdar; C. R. Mehta; L. P. Gite; K. N. Agrawal; B. B. Gaikwad; P. Shukla

doi:10.52151/jae2022592.1769

Authors

R. R. Potdar Scientist, Agricultural Mechanization Division, ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal-462038, Madhya Pradesh, India Author
C. R. Mehta Director, ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal-462038, Madhya Pradesh, India Author
L. P. Gite Emeritus Scientist, ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal-462038, Madhya Pradesh, India Author
K. N. Agrawal Project Coordinator, AICRP on Ergonomics and Safety in Agriculture, ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal-462038, Madhya Pradesh, India Author
B. B. Gaikwad Scientist, School of Atmospheric Stress Management, ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Malegaon, Baramati, Maharashtra, India Author
P. Shukla Ph.D. Scholar (Farm Power and Equipment), ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal-462038, Madhya Pradesh, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2022592.1769

Keywords:

Gender-neutral, reach envelope, seat index point, tractor controls, workplace

Abstract

Tractors have played a crucial role in India’s agricultural mechanisation. The involvement of women workers has increased in various agricultural operations. They are also becoming controllers of various farm machines and are expected to operate various self-propelled farm machines, especially tractors. The operators’ workplace on tractors used on farms need to be ergonomically compatible with the abilities of men and women workers. The present study was intended to develop the hand- and leg-reach envelopes to optimise the location of tractor controls based on anthropometric data of male and female Indian agricultural workers. Based on optimum hand-reach envelopes, gender-neutral tractor workplace accommodating 90% of operators of both genders suggested that the hand controls should not be closer than 317 mm and farther than 430 mm in the horizontal direction from seat index point (SIP). These controls should be placed between 186 mm and 380 mm in the vertical direction above the SIP. In the lateral direction, the controls should be placed within 424 mm on either side of the SIP. Based on leg reach envelopes, the foot pedals should not be located nearer than 410 mm and farther than 452 mm in the horizontal direction from the SIP. These controls also should not be placed nearer than 261 mm and farther than 373 mm downward from the SIP. In the lateral direction, the controls should not be placed nearer than 131 mm and farther than 283 mm on either side of the SIP.

References

Agrawal K N; Singh R K P; Satapathy K K. 2010. Anthropometric considerations of farm tools/machinery design for tribal workers of Northeastern India. Agric. Eng. Int.: CIGR J., 12(1), 143-150.

Anon. 2022. Annual tractor production crosses 1m, exports surpass 1 lakh for the 1st time in 2021. The Hindu Business Line (Chennai Edition), E paper, 10 June, 2022. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/annual-tractor-production-crosses-1-mexports-surpass-1-lakh-for-the-1st-time-in-2021/article38204109.ece

Das B; Grady R M. 1983. The normal working area in the horizontal plane: A comparative analysis between Farley’s and Squires’ concepts. Ergon., 26(5), 449-459.

Dewangan K N; Prasannakumar G V; Suja P L; Choudhury M D. 2005. Anthropometric dimensions of farm youth of the north-eastern region of India. Int. J. Industr. Ergon., 35, 979-989

Gite L P; Yadav B G. 1989. Anthropometric survey for agricultural machinery design. Appl. Ergon., 20, 191-196.

Gite L P; Agrawal K N; Mehta C R; Potdar R R; Narwariya B S. 2020. Handbook of Ergonomical Design of Agricultural Tools, Equipment and Work Places. Jain Brothers, New Delhi, 4-21.

BIS. 1998. Technical requirements for operator’s seat of agricultural tractors. IS 12343, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 6-10.

Grandjean E; Kroemer K H. 1997. Fitting the task to the human: a textbook of occupational ergonomics. CRC press, London, U.K., 60-62.

Khadatkar A; Mehta C R; Gite L P. 2017. Development of reach envelops of optimum location of tractor controls based on Central Indian male agricultural workers. Agric. Eng. Today, 41(2), 34-39.

Kumar A; Gaikwad B B; Singh J K. 2009. Assessment of controls layout of Indian tractors. Applied Ergonomics 40, 91-102.

Matthews J; Knight A A. 1971. Ergonomics in Agricultural Equipment Design. National Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedford, United Kingdom, 8-12.

Mehta C R; Tiwari P S; Rokade S; Pandey M M; Pharade S C; Gite LP; Yadav S B. 2007. Leg strength of Indian operators in the operation of tractor pedals. Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 37, 283-289.

Nag P K; Gite L P. 2020. Human-centered Agriculture. Springer, Singapore, 283-291.

Patel R; Kumar A; Mohan D. 2000. Development of an ergonomic evaluation facility for Indian tractors. Appl. Ergon., 31, 311-316.

Potdar R R; Mehta C R; Gaikwad B B; Gite L P; Narwariya B S. 2018. Anthropometry and segmental proportions of female agricultural workers of Bhopal district of Madhya Pradesh. Agric. Eng. Today, 42(1), 26-37.

Potdar R R; Tiwari P S; Agrawal K N; Jyoti B; Shukla P. 2021. Intervention of dynapod in cleanercum-grader for drudgery reduction. J. Agri Search, 8(1), 35-39.

Shukla P; Mehta C R; Agrawal K N; Potdar R R. 2021. Studies on operational frequencies of controls on self-propelled combine harvesters in India. J. Agric. Eng., 58(2), 101-111.

Shukla P; Mehta C R; Agrawal K N; Potdar R R; Kumar M; Singh K. 2022. Approach for ergonomic assessment of self-propelled combine harvester seats based on anthropometric body dimensions. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon., (accepted; doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2022.2038460), 1-33.

Tiwari K. 2001. Ergonomical evaluation of tractor operator’s workplace and activity. Unpublished M. Tech. thesis, J. N. K. V. V., Jabalpur.