Modelling of Physical Properties for Prediction of Internal Quality Attributes of Kinnow

Authors

  • Manpreet Kaur Grewal Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology, P.O. PAU Campus, Ludhiana 141 004. Author
  • Nilesh N. Gaikwad S .N. Jha D. M. Kadam Jaspreet Kaur Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology, P.O. PAU Campus, Ludhiana 141 004. Author
  • Harleen Kaur Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology, P.O. PAU Campus, Ludhiana 141 004. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2012494.1491

Keywords:

Kinnow, prediction models, internal quality attributes, physical properties

Abstract

Kinnow mandarin is a common citrus fruit grown commercially in north India. It is a rich source of vitamin C having high juice content and relished for its distinct flavour. Outer skin blemishes and shiny appearance are the primary parameters for quality assessment after harvesting, but the internal quality attributes of fruit are ignored due to lack of sorting methods. Models were developed for predictionof total soluble solids (TSS in 0Brix) and Brix to acid ratio (BAR) from the physical attributes such as geometrical mean diameter (Dg), colour (Hunter a/b ratio) and fruit density (ρ) measured non-destructively. The physical and chemical attributes were fitted in eight models using multiple linear regressions (MLR). The correlation coefficientsfor calibration and prediction of model (no. 4) fitted for variables Dg, colour and ρ for determination of TSS were 0.86 and 0.85, respectively. Similarly, the model (no. 8) relating three physical variables with BAR had correlation coefficients for calibration and prediction of 0.83 and 0.81, respectively. Besides satisfactory correlation coefficients, both the models exhibited low standard error of calibration and prediction as 0.95, 0.98 and 1.88, 1.94, respectively. The modelled correlation between physical and internal quality attributes can be a basis for development of low cost non-destructive sorting of kinnow mandarin.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbott JA; Lu R; Upchurch B L; Stroshine R. 1997. Technologies for nondestructive quality evaluation of fruits and vegetables. In: Janicke (ed) Horticultural Reviews Chichester, U.K., Wiley, 2–120.

Bureau S; Ruiz D; Reich M; Gouble B; Bertrand D; Audergon J; Renard CMGC. 2009. Rapid and nondestructive analysis of apricot fruit quality using FT-nearinfrared spectroscopy. Food Chem., 113, 1323–1328.

Gangwar LS; Singh D; Singh DB. 2007. Estimation of post-harvest losses in kinnow mandarin in Punjab using a modified formula. Agr.Econ. Res. Rev., 20, 315-331.

Hardy S; Sanderson G. 2010. Citrus maturity testing. Primefacts, 980, 1-6.

Iwamoto M; Kawano S; Ozaki Y. 1995. An overview of research and development of near infrared spectroscopy in Japan. J. Near Infrared Spec., 3, 179–189.

Jha SN; Matsuoka T. 2000. Non-destructive techniques for quality evaluation of intact fruits and vegetables. Food Sci. Technol. Res., 6, 248–251.

Jha SN ; Matsuoka T. 2002. Surface gloss and weight of eggplant during storage. Biosystems Engg., 81(4), 407-412.

Jha SN; Chopra S; Kingsly ARP. 2005. Determination of sweetness of intact mango using visual spectral analysis. Biosystems Engg., 91(2), 157–161.

Jha SN; Chopra S; Kingsly ARP. 2007. Modeling of color values for nondestructive evaluation of maturity of mango. J. Food Engg., 78, 22–26.

Jha SN. 2007. Mathematical modeling for extraction of juice from citrus fruit and whey during paneer pressing. Int. Agril. Engg. Journal, 16 (1-2), 71-77.

Jha SN; Rai DR; Gunasekaran S. 2010. Visual spectroscopy and nondestructive evaluation of quality of apple. J. Agril. Engg., 47(2), 9-13.

Jordan RB; Walton EF; Klages KU; Seelye RJ. 2000. Postharvest fruit density as an indicator of dry matter and ripened soluble solids of kiwifruit. Postharvest Biol. Tec., 20, 163–173.

Miller WM. 1990. Internal quality attributes of the Florida Valencia orange and their relationship to fruit density measurements. Appl. Eng. Agric., 6 (4), 461-464.

Mohsenin NN. 1980. Physical properties of plant and animal materials. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, USA.

Monselise SP. 1986. Citrus. In: Monselise (ed) Handbook of fruit state and development, CRC press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 87- 108.

Pathaveerat S; Terdwongworakul A; Phaungsombut A. 2008. Multivariate data analysis for classification of pineapple maturity. J. Food Engg., 89,112–118.

Richardson AC; MacAneney KJ; Dawson TE. 1997. Carbohydrate dynamics in kiwifruit. J. Hortic. Sci., 72, 907-917.

Sandhu SS. 1992. Postharvest handling techniques for cv. Kinnow mandarin. Acta Hort., 321,747-755.

Sharma AD. 2009. Postharvest technology of Kinnow. Scientific Publishers (India).

Sharma AD; Ghuman BS. 2007. Development & Testing of prototype for on-farm waxing and grading of fresh kinnow mandarin. Int. J. Trop. Agric., 25,57-65.

Ting SV; Rouseff RL. 1986. Measurement of quality for grades and standards In : Citrus fruits and their products: Analysis and Technology, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, USA, 27-65.

Ting SV; Attaway JA. 1971. Citrus fruits. In: Hulme (ed) The biochemistry of fruits and their products, Academic press, London, UK, 107-160.

Published

2012-12-29

Issue

Section

Regular Issue

How to Cite

Manpreet Kaur Grewal, Nilesh N. Gaikwad S .N. Jha D. M. Kadam Jaspreet Kaur, & Harleen Kaur. (2012). Modelling of Physical Properties for Prediction of Internal Quality Attributes of Kinnow. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 49(4), 20-24. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2012494.1491