Performance Evaluation of Spatially Modified No-Till Drill under Different Field Conditions

Authors

  • Manjeet Singh Deptt. of Farm Machinery & Power Engineering, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana Author
  • AseemVerma Deptt. of Farm Machinery & Power Engineering, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana Author
  • Jaskarn Singh Mahal Additional Director of Research (FM & B), PAU, Ludhiana Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2014514.1559

Keywords:

No-till drill, residue management, straw chopper-cum-spreader, sowing performance

Abstract

A major problem in sowing wheat crop under no-tillage condition in combine harvested paddy fields is the frequent choking of no-till drill machine due to long loose paddy straw lying in the windrows. Effective residue management requires both straw and chaff to be finely chopped and evenly spread over the entire cutting width of combine. Sowing performance of spatially modified no-till drill in combine harvested paddy field after one operation of straw chopper-cum-spreader,was studied. Spatially modified no-till drill with 3-member frame, 600 mm vertical clearance and 600 mm tine-to-tine spacingdid not have straw accumulation when operated in field pre-operated with straw chopper-cum-spreader. Sowing performance of the drill on the basis of furrow geometry and seed placement was similar to that of a conventional no-till drill operated in clean field. Residue as mulch reduced the germination of wheat seedlings, but subsequently the overall germination count was not affected by the mulch. The difference in plant height, effective tiller count, ear length, number of grains per ear head, thousand grain mass and grain yield were found to be non-significant for both the treatments at 5% level of significance.

References

Anon. 2010. Package of practices for crops of Punjab – rabi 2010. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.

Bansal S K. 2002. Studies on effect of direct seeding technologies on wheat crops under different paddy residue conditions. Unpublished M.Tech. thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.

Graham J P; Ellis F B; Christian D G; Cannell R Q. 1986. Effects of straw residues on the establishment, growth and yield of autumn sown cereals. J. Agric. Engg. Res., 33, 39-49.

Shukla L N; Tandon S K; Verma S R. 1984. Development and field evaluation of coulter arrangement for direct drilling. Agric. Mech. Asia, Africa and Latin America, 27(4), 15-18.

Singh B; Singh T P. 1995. Development and performance of zero-till seed drill. J. Agric. Engg., 32(1-4), 13-23.

Singh M. 2004. Studies on No-till seed drill with a straw thrower attachment in combine harvested paddy field. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.

Singh M; Shukla L N. 2006. Design optimization of notill drill components by using finite element analysis. In: Proc.4thWorld Congress of ‘Computers in Agriculture and Natural Resources’, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, Orlando, Florida, USA, July 24-26.

Yaduraju N T. 2006. Now till zero but harvest more. The Hindu, India, July 18, 2006.

Published

2014-12-31

Issue

Section

Regular Issue

How to Cite

Manjeet Singh, AseemVerma, & Jaskarn Singh Mahal. (2014). Performance Evaluation of Spatially Modified No-Till Drill under Different Field Conditions. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 51(4), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2014514.1559