Anthropometry of Tribal Farm Women to Improvise Hand Tool Designs for Bastar District of Chhattisgarh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2021581.1746Keywords:
Bastar region, tribal woman anthropometric dimensions, wooden mallet (khotla), indigenous plough, grip diameterAbstract
Bastar district is a cultural heritage of Chhattisgarh and tribal dominated (66.3%) area. The population comprises of 42 tribes, the prominent tribes being Muria, Abhujmaria, Dandami, Gond, Maria, Dorla, Bhattra, Halba, Dhurwa, and Kawar. The economy of this region is primarily agriculture based, followed by forest-produces. Use of traditional tools like wooden mallet (khotla), indigenous plough and sickle are overwhelming while improved tools and equipment are negligible. Traditional equipment generates early fatigue, callus in hands, and drudgery for tribal women largely involved in farming. Anthropometric data of 100 tribal women between the age group of 18-45 years were measured. Statistically analysed data revealed that tribal women of Bastar had maximum stature of 1,870 mm and 1,400 mm as minimum with a mean of 1,523 mm. The standard deviation and CV were 80.6 mm and 5.29%, respectively. The maximum hand (right) pull strength for 5th and 95th percentile was 36.6 N and 117.6 N, respectively. Anthropometric data was utilized to improvise the design of khotla and indigenous plough. The maximum length of khotla handle was decided to be 2,105 mm, while that of minimum length was 1,620 mm. The total weight of khotla could be reduced by 23 per cent. Consequently, ΔHR reduced by 20-25 bpm from earlier value of 40 bpm. The weight of indigenous plough could also be reduced by 16% (3.8 kg) by shortening the length of the handle and the beam.
References
Agarwal K N; Tiwari P S; Gite L P; Babu V B. 2007. Final Report of Anthropometric Survey of Agricultural Workers of Madhya Pradesh. Agricultural Mechanization Division, CIAE, Bhopal, Publication no. 426, 102-103.
Agrawal K N; Singh R K P; Satapathy K K. 2010. Anthropometric considerations for farm tools/ machinery design for tribal workers of north eastern India. Agric. Eng. Int.: CIGREjournal, XII, MES 1406.
Agrawal K N; Tiwari P S; Gite L P; Pharade S; Majumdar J. 2011. Anthropometry of agricultural workers of Madhya Pradesh. J. Agric. Eng., 48(4), 28-33.
Census of India. 2011. District Census Handbook, Bastar, Directorate of Census Operations, Chhattisgarh, Series-23, Part-XIIA, 23.
Dewangan K N; Kumar Prasanna; Suja G V; Choudhury M D. 2010. Anthropometric dimensions of farm youth of the north eastern region of India. Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 35, 979-989.
Dewangan K N; Owary C; Datta R K. 2008. Anthropometric data of female farm workers from north eastern India and design of hand tools of the hilly region. Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 38, 90-100.
Everett P; Sills F. 2014. The Relationship of Grip Strength to Stature, Somatov type Components, and Anthropometric Measurements of the Hand. Research Quarterly, American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 23, 161-166. 10.1080/106 71188.1952.10761971.
Fernandez J A; Uppugonduri K G. 1992. Anthropometry of south Indian industrial workmen. Ergon., 35 (11), 1393-1398.
Gite L P; Chatterjee D. 1999. All India Anthropometric Survey of Agricultural Workers: Proposed Action Plan. All India Coordinated Research Project on Human Engineering and Safety in Agriculture, Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal, India, 5-7.
Gite L P; Yadav B G. 1989. Anthropometric survey for agricultural machinery design. Appl. Ergon., 20, 191-196.
Gite L P; Majumder J; Mehta C R; Khadatkar Abhijit. 2009. Anthropometric and strength data of Indian agricultural workers for farm equipment design. Coordinating Cell AICRP on ESA, CIAE Bhopal, Book No. CIAE/2009/4, pp: 253. ISBN: 978-81-909305-0-5.
Kar S K; Ghosh S; Manna I; Banerjee S; Dhara P. 2003. An investigation of hand anthropometry of agricultural workers. J. Hum. Ecol., 14(1), 57-62.
Mehta C R; Gite L P; Khadatkar A. 2018. Women empowerment through agricultural mechanization in India. Current Sci., 114 (9), 1934-1940.
More S H; Vyavahare R T. 2014.Anthropometric and grip strength data of agricultural workers for Marathwada region of Maharashtra (India). Int. J. Appl. Eng. Technol., 4 (2), 148-153.
Nag P K; Goswami A; Ashtekar S P; Pradhan C K. 1988. Ergonomics in sickle operation. Appl. Ergon., 19(3), 233-239.
Philip G S; Tewari V K. 2000. Anthropometry of Indian female agricultural workers and implication on tool design. Agric. Mech. Asia Afr. Latin Am., 31(1), 63-66.
Roebuck J A; Kroemer K H E; Thomson W G. 1975. Engineering anthropometry methods. Aeronaut. J., 79 (780), 555-560.
Singh S P; Gite L P; Majumedar J; Agarwal N. 2008. Aerobic capacity of Indian Farm Women using sub-maximal exercise technique on tread mill. Agric. Eng. Int.: CIGRE J., X, MES 08001.
Tewari V K; Shrivastava A K. 2013. An industry perspective of tractor safety against rollover. Agric. Mech. Asia Afr. Latin Am., 44 (3), 61-69.
Tiwari P S; Gite L P; Majumder J; Pharade S C; Singh V V. 2010. Push/pull strength of agricultural workers in central India. Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 40, 1-7.
Varghese M S; Saha P H; Bhatnagar A; Chouhan A. 1994. Development of Data Base for Occupational Workload and Physical Fitness Status of Indian Women. DSA Project Report SNDT Women University, Bombay, India, Publication No. 123, 45-46.
Victor V M; Nath S; Verma A. 2002.Anthropometric survey of Indian farm workers to approach ergonomics in agricultural machinery design. Appl. Ergon., 33, 579-581.
Yadav R; Tewari V K; Prasad N. 1997. Anthropometric data of Indian farm workers - A module analysis. Appl. Ergn., 28 (I), 69-71.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
