Emerging Issues due to Adoption of Submersible Pump Technology in Marginal Quality Areas of Haryana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2013504.1532Keywords:
Centrifugal pump, ground water balance, rice-wheat rotation, submersible pumpAbstract
Declining water table, indicative of overall negative ground water balance, has emerged as the most serious challenge to sustainability of irrigated agriculture in many states of India. It is resulting in reduced discharge from shallow wells, and replacement of centrifugal with submersible pumps. It is more so in marginal ground water quality areas such as Assandh block of Karnal district of Haryana, where deep semi-confined aquifers are of relatively good quality as compared to shallow aquifers. Ground water balance of the Assandh block, a marginal water quality area, was assessed based on the net annual pumping from the groundwater and net annual replenishable recharge. Even under the existing set-up, net annual replenishable recharge was negative and would result in lowering of water table by 80-90 cm.annum-1. Temporal changes in pumped water quality revealed some increase in EC of the water of deeper aquifer. Studies revealed that water productivity was low under submersible than under centrifugal pump systems, mainly due to higher water application under the former situation. Under both the situations, pump efficiencies for selected centrifugal and submersible pumps were low (< 40%), although relatively higher efficiencies were observed for submersible pumps. Inappropriate size of submersible pumps and its placement at inappropriate depth were few reasons of low efficiencies amongst others. Since rice-wheat crop rotation is being factored as the major cause of groundwater decline in several states, notably Haryana, Punjab and Western Uttar Pradesh, diversification to low water requiring crops would help halt the declining trend in the water table to some extent, and would reduce the replacement rate of centrifugal to submersible pumps.
Downloads
References
Anon. 2000. Statistical abstracts of Haryana. Economic and Statistical Organization, Government of Haryana, Chandigarh.
Anon. 2011. Statistical abstracts of Punjab. Economic and Statistical Organization, Government of Punjab, Chandigarh.
Anon. 2011. Statistical abstracts of Haryana. Economic and Statistical Organization, Government of Haryana, Chandigarh.
CGWB. 2010. Ground water scenario of India 2009-10. Central Ground Water Board, Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, Faridabad, June, pp:12.
Chadha D K. 2002. State of art of artificial groundwater recharge applied on village level scheme in India. In: Proc. Seminar on Management of Aquifer Recharge and Subsurface Storage Making Better Use of Our Largest Reservoir, (Eds. Tuinhof, A and Heederik, J P), Wageningen, The Netherlands, 18-19.
CSSRI. 1990. Annual Report 1989-90. Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal.
Gupta S K; Minhas P S; Sondhi S K; Tyagi N K; Yadav J S P. 2000. Water Resources Management. In: Natural Resource Management for Agriculture Production in India. (Eds. Yadav, J S P, Singh, G B), Proc. International Conference on Managing Natural Resources for Sustainable Agricultural Production in 21st Century, New Delhi, 138-244.
Khuller R K. 2006. Groundwater management in Haryana and emerging issues. In: Groundwater Governance, 12th National Symposium on Hydrology, New Delhi, organizedby NIH, Roorkee and CGWB, New Delhi, Nov. 14-15, New Delhi, 231-236.
Kaledhonkar M J; Gupta SK; Saxena C K; Sharma D P. 2006. Implications of submersible pumps in declining water table areas of trans Indo-gangetic Plains. In: Proc. 12th National Symposium on Hydrology, New Delhi, organized by NIH, Roorkee and CGWB, New Delhi, Nov. 14-15, New Delhi, 93-104.
MIB. 2006. India: 2005, A Reference Manual. Publication Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Govt. of India, New Delhi.
Shah T. 2009. India’s ground water irrigation economy: the challenge of balancing livelihoods and environment. Bhujal, 24 (4), 21-37.
Singh K. 2009. Act to save groundwater in Punjab: its impact on water table, electricity subsidy and environment. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 22, 365–386.





